Re: Draft SC for Obvious purpose

Here is an update

The comment on Ads might be too contentious to be included :)
Steve Lee
OpenDirective http://opendirective.com


On 30 August 2016 at 20:58,  <steve@opendirective.com> wrote:
> Lisa
>
> Very good point. I'll address that. Thanks
>
> Steve
>
> Get Outlook for Android
>
>
>
>
> On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 8:29 PM +0100, "lisa.seeman" <lisa.seeman@zoho.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Thanks Steve!
>>
>> I think we may need to work on the wording to make sure that it is clear
>> if a page conforms and clear if a page does not conform.
>>
>> How does a developer know if it is obvious or not? (It might be obvious to
>> him/her but not to anyone who is not 21 years old)
>>
>> All the best
>>
>> Lisa Seeman
>>
>> LinkedIn, Twitter
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ---- On Tue, 30 Aug 2016 20:49:47 +0300 Steve Lee<steve@opendirective.com>
>> wrote ----
>>
>> I've attached my initial attempt at the Obvious Purpose SC.
>>
>> I'm happy to make the PR and receive feedback on GitHub rather than here.
>>
>> What do I need to do to improve it or is it enough?
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> Steve Lee
>> OpenDirective http://opendirective.com
>>
>>
>>
>

Received on Monday, 5 September 2016 15:09:01 UTC