Re: timeline

+1
On Sep 13, 2016 6:50 AM, "lisa.seeman" <lisa.seeman@zoho.com> wrote:

> Hi Folk
> Please send a +1 if you agree to this process
>
> I would like to proposes the following time line.
>
> A draft* of each SC* should be uploaded by the *4th October*. The drafts *do
> not need to be perfect*, and you can put any known issues in the working
> groups notes at the bottom (such as mike did not like the conforment
> options, or you have no idea what conformance level to use). If you did not
> submit a draft by then we might reallocate your SC.
>
>
> I can volunteer to spend the next week reviewing them and sorting out any
> generic issues and specific issues.
> If people do not mind I can also edit them a bit such as  adding examples.
>  (Let me know if you mind if I  edit your SC.)
>
> The* week of the 18th  of October *people can do edits that address any
> generic issues that were raised. Please clear some time that week.
>
> I can take another round of reviews the next week and then...
> We can address any individual issues, SC that are not done etc in November
>
> Does that sound OK?
>
> We have to make all our submissions to WCAG by December 1st.
>
>
> All the best
>
> Lisa SeemanLinkedIn <http://il.linkedin.com/in/lisaseeman/>, Twitter
> <https://twitter.com/SeemanLisa>
>
> <http://il.linkedin.com/in/lisaseeman/> <https://twitter.com/SeemanLisa>
>
>
>