public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org from June 2007 by subject

!result in components

@select on p:for-each redundant?

Allow @namespace on p:pipeline

Allow ignored namespaces everywhere?

Allow unknown steps?

Another ('nother) parameters proposal

authentication on http-requests

Base URI processing

can we have last() having a consistent value ?

Cardinality of inputs

Composability

Consensus?

Context for p:option

Default bindings on p:output incoherent???

defaulting

Do we have consensus on these three proposals?

Editor's draft for review by 28 June 2007

For-each

General remarks on Annex A (very big mail, sorry for that)

High priority items for Thursday

http-request as a filter

Low hanging fruit?

Making vanilla implementation of position() DTRT

Making vanilla implementation of position() DTRT (was Re: The semantics of position() -- trying to be very explicit)

New draft, 8 June 2007

New draft...sortof

On parameters

Option syntax

p:equal

p:input vs. p:parameter-input

p:map

p:wrap-sequence

Parameter issue: parameters-as-documents or specialised handling

Pipeline Parameters by Default

position vs index

position() after match in component

Proposal for p:split-sequence

Proposed dynamic error: a select that doesn't select nodes

Recursion

Replace p:episode with p:system-property

Revised parameters proposal

select in for-each and iteration-source

Some edge cases with respect to parameters

The semantics of position() -- trying to be very explicit

Tricky samples of position()

Two renames

Updated editor's draft

We need a versioning story

Wiki page for proposal tracking

XProc Agenda 14 June 2007

XProc Agenda 21 June 2007

XProc Agenda 28 June 2007

XProc Agenda 7 June 2007

XProc Minutes 14 June 2007

XProc Minutes 21 June 2007

XProc Minutes 28 June 2007

XProc Minutes 7 June 2007

Last message date: Thursday, 28 June 2007 18:16:42 UTC