- From: Alessandro Vernet <avernet@orbeon.com>
- Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2007 00:41:48 +0200
- To: public-xml-processing-model-wg <public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org>
On 6/12/07, Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> wrote: > And then we simply have a new port named "parameters" on (some|all) > steps and a new step called "p:parameter-set". Yes! This is something I suggested earlier [1], and Jeni pushed the idea a little further with a proposal for a <p:parameter-set> step [2]. IMHO, what we loose by creating a little syntactic overhead, we gain tenfold in conceptual simplicity. Alex [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-processing-model-wg/2007May/0450.html [2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-processing-model-wg/2007May/0453.html -- Orbeon Forms - Web 2.0 Forms, open-source, for the Enterprise http://www.orbeon.com/
Received on Tuesday, 12 June 2007 22:42:38 UTC