- From: Richard Tobin <richard@inf.ed.ac.uk>
- Date: Sat, 23 Jun 2007 00:14:00 +0100 (BST)
- To: Jeni Tennison <jeni@jenitennison.com>, public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org
> The other option would be to say that all inputs are bound to the > default readable port if they're not explicitly bound, such that > > <p:pipeline> > <p:xslt1 /> > </p:pipeline> > > accepts an XSLT stylesheet input and runs it on itself (this is actually > something I do quite a lot). That would have the disadvantage of concealing the probably-common error of forgetting about one of the inputs to a step. -- Richard
Received on Friday, 22 June 2007 23:14:10 UTC