- From: Henry S. Thompson <ht@inf.ed.ac.uk>
- Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2007 11:48:19 +0100
- To: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
- Cc: public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Norman Walsh writes:
> * Users should be required to indicate that a particular input port is
> only for parameters on the p:declare-step (and on p:pipelines that
> they write).
>
> * Users should be forbidden from indicating that a particular input
> port is only for parameters on the "call" to the step. In other
> words, p:input should be used exclusively for both.
> And
>
> * I think we should use paramters="yes|no" to indicate whether or not
> a particular input port is only for parameters.
I can live with all this -- I note that the combination of the last
two means in practice that 'parameters' is not allowed on the "call"
to a step.
ht
- --
Henry S. Thompson, HCRC Language Technology Group, University of Edinburgh
Half-time member of W3C Team
2 Buccleuch Place, Edinburgh EH8 9LW, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440
Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@inf.ed.ac.uk
URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/
[mail really from me _always_ has this .sig -- mail without it is forged spam]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFGeldzkjnJixAXWBoRAlOXAJ9nndYdw7thfbg3UGvnDZGJ4DDNUQCffZHN
XHyH9wzWyEbg4P03G9dedt0=
=/gL5
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Received on Thursday, 21 June 2007 10:48:29 UTC