- From: Henry S. Thompson <ht@inf.ed.ac.uk>
- Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2007 11:48:19 +0100
- To: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
- Cc: public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Norman Walsh writes: > * Users should be required to indicate that a particular input port is > only for parameters on the p:declare-step (and on p:pipelines that > they write). > > * Users should be forbidden from indicating that a particular input > port is only for parameters on the "call" to the step. In other > words, p:input should be used exclusively for both. > And > > * I think we should use paramters="yes|no" to indicate whether or not > a particular input port is only for parameters. I can live with all this -- I note that the combination of the last two means in practice that 'parameters' is not allowed on the "call" to a step. ht - -- Henry S. Thompson, HCRC Language Technology Group, University of Edinburgh Half-time member of W3C Team 2 Buccleuch Place, Edinburgh EH8 9LW, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440 Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@inf.ed.ac.uk URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/ [mail really from me _always_ has this .sig -- mail without it is forged spam] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFGeldzkjnJixAXWBoRAlOXAJ9nndYdw7thfbg3UGvnDZGJ4DDNUQCffZHN XHyH9wzWyEbg4P03G9dedt0= =/gL5 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Received on Thursday, 21 June 2007 10:48:29 UTC