- From: Henry S. Thompson <ht@inf.ed.ac.uk>
- Date: Wed, 06 Jun 2007 15:56:07 +0100
- To: Jeni Tennison <jeni@jenitennison.com>
- Cc: public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Jeni Tennison writes:
> 1. Those that expose and pass parameters as (sequences of) documents,
> which are then amenable to manipulation in the same way as other
> documents.
>
> 2. Those that provide specialised mechanisms for handling parameters,
> such as <p:parameter-set>.
I think this opposition is misleading at best. Most (all?) the
proposals on the table provide for parameter setting via (sequences
of) documents -- the question is whether that's the _only_ mechanism,
or not. I think doing that makes the simple cases overly complicated.
ht
- --
Henry S. Thompson, HCRC Language Technology Group, University of Edinburgh
Half-time member of W3C Team
2 Buccleuch Place, Edinburgh EH8 9LW, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440
Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@inf.ed.ac.uk
URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/
[mail really from me _always_ has this .sig -- mail without it is forged spam]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFGZssIkjnJixAXWBoRAvYRAJ9xjrSLab1teHYX88SfjfFyz3JSMQCeJSDO
U5XwwfdLWRQlVEG5izi4y3M=
=9ke1
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Received on Wednesday, 6 June 2007 14:56:17 UTC