- From: Innovimax SARL <innovimax@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2007 20:56:00 +0200
- To: "Norman Walsh" <ndw@nwalsh.com>
- Cc: public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org
Norm, On 6/20/07, Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> wrote: > I recall discussing p:equal last week, but it doesn't seem to have been > recorded in the minutes. Am I imagining it? Nop, or we smoke the same thing, brother ! > > FWIW, I believe we agreed to add p:equal with the semantics of > fn:deep-equal. Since the deep-equal definition is a bit more complex than needed, it may be a cut and paste of *only* what we need would be good > > I think someone had a clever suggestion for the names of the two input > documents, but for the life of me, I can't recall what it was. Was it <p:input port="source"> <p:input port="compare-to"> ? > > Be seeing you, > norm > > -- > Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | Everything should be made as simple as > http://nwalsh.com/ | possible, but no simpler. > > -- Innovimax SARL Consulting, Training & XML Development 9, impasse des Orteaux 75020 Paris Tel : +33 8 72 475787 Fax : +33 1 4356 1746 http://www.innovimax.fr RCS Paris 488.018.631 SARL au capital de 10.000 €
Received on Wednesday, 20 June 2007 18:56:06 UTC