- From: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
- Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2007 15:21:15 -0400
- To: public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org
- Message-ID: <878xanmzis.fsf@nwalsh.com>
/ Alessandro Vernet <avernet@orbeon.com> was heard to say: | On 6/12/07, Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> wrote: |> And then we simply have a new port named "parameters" on (some|all) |> steps and a new step called "p:parameter-set". | | Yes! | | This is something I suggested earlier [1], and Jeni pushed the idea a | little further with a proposal for a <p:parameter-set> step [2]. IMHO, | what we loose by creating a little syntactic overhead, we gain tenfold | in conceptual simplicity. Yes, I was keenly aware when I composed my original message that you and Jeni had gotten there before me. Such is the nature of design by committee, I think. Be seeing you, norm -- Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | The only thing that makes life possible http://nwalsh.com/ | is permanent, intolerable uncertainty; | not knowing what comes next.--Ursula K. | LeGuin
Received on Wednesday, 13 June 2007 19:21:23 UTC