- From: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
- Date: Tue, 05 Jun 2007 10:08:05 -0400
- To: public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org
Received on Tuesday, 5 June 2007 14:08:16 UTC
/ "Innovimax SARL" <innovimax@gmail.com> was heard to say:
| Hum...
| the definition of pipeline is
|
| <p:pipeline
| name? = NCName
| p:ignore-prefixes? = prefix list>
| ((p:input |
| p:output |
| p:option |
| p:parameter |
| p:import |
| p:declare-step |
| p:journal)*,
| subpipeline)
| </p:pipeline>
|
| so you can have p:option after p:step !!
No you can't. The content model is:
(p:input|p:output|p:option|p:parameter|p:import|p:declare-step|p:journal)*,
subpipeline
Once you start with steps, all you can do is steps. And I'd *really*
like to keep it that way.
Be seeing you,
norm
--
Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | As charms are nonsense, nonsense is a
http://nwalsh.com/ | charm.--Benjamin Franklin
Received on Tuesday, 5 June 2007 14:08:16 UTC