- From: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
- Date: Tue, 05 Jun 2007 10:08:05 -0400
- To: public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org
Received on Tuesday, 5 June 2007 14:08:16 UTC
/ "Innovimax SARL" <innovimax@gmail.com> was heard to say: | Hum... | the definition of pipeline is | | <p:pipeline | name? = NCName | p:ignore-prefixes? = prefix list> | ((p:input | | p:output | | p:option | | p:parameter | | p:import | | p:declare-step | | p:journal)*, | subpipeline) | </p:pipeline> | | so you can have p:option after p:step !! No you can't. The content model is: (p:input|p:output|p:option|p:parameter|p:import|p:declare-step|p:journal)*, subpipeline Once you start with steps, all you can do is steps. And I'd *really* like to keep it that way. Be seeing you, norm -- Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | As charms are nonsense, nonsense is a http://nwalsh.com/ | charm.--Benjamin Franklin
Received on Tuesday, 5 June 2007 14:08:16 UTC