- From: Henry S. Thompson <ht@inf.ed.ac.uk>
- Date: Wed, 06 Jun 2007 13:10:47 +0100
- To: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
- Cc: public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Norman Walsh writes:
> In atomic steps, I can just leave out the p:input element, but for
> compound steps I can't, so it would be inconvenient if
>
> <p:input port="source"/>
>
> wasn't a request for the default binding.
Hunh? Can't leave out _what_ p:input element?
E.g. p:iteration-source? But it's optional, and defaults in the
obvious way . . .
I guess I agree with the proposal anyway. . .
ht
- --
Henry S. Thompson, HCRC Language Technology Group, University of Edinburgh
Half-time member of W3C Team
2 Buccleuch Place, Edinburgh EH8 9LW, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440
Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@inf.ed.ac.uk
URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/
[mail really from me _always_ has this .sig -- mail without it is forged spam]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFGZqRHkjnJixAXWBoRAlqZAJ943O68sdLjeO55SpaFt+Q6Ak7XIQCggmD5
e6/wzNqn3Rv1yGZHM4ZP5/w=
=NHto
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Received on Wednesday, 6 June 2007 12:10:50 UTC