- From: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
- Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2007 07:26:36 -0400
- To: public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org
- Message-ID: <87sl8lr1jn.fsf@nwalsh.com>
/ ht@inf.ed.ac.uk (Henry S. Thompson) was heard to say: | Alex Milowski writes: | |> On 6/20/07, Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> wrote: | |>> Now that we have a p:doc(umentation) element, does it still make sense |>> to have support for ignoring namespaces at every level? | |> I be happy with only allowing it on the document element or some |> "top-level". | | +1 -- let's constrain this to the places where it is actually likely | to be useful. Ok, I suggest that we allow the ignored-namespaces attribute (which can lose the 'p:' namespace now) only on p:pipeline in V1 and that elements in those namespaces are only ignored if they are direct children of the p:pipeline element. The content of p:inline will continue to be "quoted" and the content of p:doc(umentation) will be ignored irrespective of the namespaces used. Be seeing you, norm -- Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | A man can believe a considerable deal http://nwalsh.com/ | of rubbish, and yet go about his daily | work in a rational and cheerful | manner.--Norman Douglas
Received on Thursday, 21 June 2007 11:26:42 UTC