- From: Innovimax SARL <innovimax@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2007 14:26:49 +0200
- To: "Jeni Tennison" <jeni@jenitennison.com>
- Cc: public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org
Jeni, On 6/12/07, Jeni Tennison <jeni@jenitennison.com> wrote: > > > I like p:source better than some of the other possibilities. Jeni, > > how does that sound to you? > > A bit confusing when we have <p:pipe step="..." source="..." />. We use > 'source' as a generic term for something you can read documents from, so > that might become confusing. What about p:resource? Where did you find <p:pipe step="..." source="..." /> in the current spec ? Mohamed -- Innovimax SARL Consulting, Training & XML Development 9, impasse des Orteaux 75020 Paris Tel : +33 8 72 475787 Fax : +33 1 4356 1746 http://www.innovimax.fr RCS Paris 488.018.631 SARL au capital de 10.000 €
Received on Wednesday, 13 June 2007 12:26:58 UTC