Re: Allow ignored namespaces everywhere?

/ Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> was heard to say:
| / ht@inf.ed.ac.uk (Henry S. Thompson) was heard to say:
| | Alex Milowski writes:
| |
| |> On 6/20/07, Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> wrote:
| |
| |>> Now that we have a p:doc(umentation) element, does it still make sense
| |>> to have support for ignoring namespaces at every level?
| |
| |> I be happy with only allowing it on the document element or some
| |> "top-level".
| |
| | +1 -- let's constrain this to the places where it is actually likely
| | to be useful.
|
| Ok, I suggest that we allow the ignored-namespaces attribute (which
| can lose the 'p:' namespace now) only on p:pipeline in V1 and that

                              and p:pipeline-library ^

| elements in those namespaces are only ignored if they are direct
| children of the p:pipeline element.
                            ^ or p:pipeline-library
|
| The content of p:inline will continue to be "quoted" and the content
| of p:doc(umentation) will be ignored irrespective of the namespaces
| used.

                                        Be seeing you,
                                          norm

-- 
Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | Everything should be made as simple as
http://nwalsh.com/            | possible, but no simpler.