- From: Innovimax SARL <innovimax@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2007 12:27:42 +0200
- To: "XProc WG" <public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org>
<p:viewport
name? = NCName
match = xpath expression
p:ignore-prefixes? = prefix list>
(p:viewport-source?,
p:output,
p:journal,
(p:option |
p:parameter)*,
subpipeline)
</p:viewport>
it is read
@name is optional (OK)
@match is required (OK)
@p:ignore-prefixes is optional (OK)
p:viewport is optional as a first child (OK)
p:output is required (OK since we have only one output)
p:journal is required (WHY ??[1])
(p:option or p:parameter) zero or more (ok for p:option but what is
the aim of p:parameter here ? [2])
and a subpipeline
shouldn't it better be
<p:viewport
name? = NCName
match = xpath expression
p:ignore-prefixes? = prefix list>
(p:viewport-source?,
p:output,
p:journal?,
p:option*,
subpipeline)
</p:viewport>
Since we mandate a perticular order for p:viewport, I propose to do
the same for the other component
Mohamed
--
Innovimax SARL
Consulting, Training & XML Development
9, impasse des Orteaux
75020 Paris
Tel : +33 8 72 475787
Fax : +33 1 4356 1746
http://www.innovimax.fr
RCS Paris 488.018.631
SARL au capital de 10.000 €
Received on Tuesday, 5 June 2007 10:27:44 UTC