- From: Jeni Tennison <jeni@jenitennison.com>
- Date: Wed, 06 Jun 2007 16:02:59 +0100
- To: public-xml-processing-model-wg@w3.org
Henry S. Thompson wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Jeni Tennison writes: > >> 1. Those that expose and pass parameters as (sequences of) documents, >> which are then amenable to manipulation in the same way as other >> documents. >> >> 2. Those that provide specialised mechanisms for handling parameters, >> such as <p:parameter-set>. > > I think this opposition is misleading at best. Most (all?) the > proposals on the table provide for parameter setting via (sequences > of) documents -- the question is whether that's the _only_ mechanism, > or not. I think doing that makes the simple cases overly complicated. I can't see anything in Norm's proposal that *exposes* the parameters passed to a pipeline as a (sequence of) documents? Jeni -- Jeni Tennison http://www.jenitennison.com
Received on Wednesday, 6 June 2007 15:03:18 UTC