public-ws-policy@w3.org from November 2006 by date

Thursday, 30 November 2006

• RE: NEW ISSUE: 3989 [Guidelines] Suggested Format Yalcinalp, Umit
• RE: ACTION 155: Draft proposed clarifications in 2.6 on use of the mtom assertion as an optional assertion Daniel Roth
• RE: NEW ISSUE: 3989 [Guidelines] Suggested Format Asir Vedamuthu
• Re: ACTION 155: Draft proposed clarifications in 2.6 on use of the mtom assertion as an optional assertion Frederick Hirsch
• Re: Agenda: WS-Policy WG Teleconference 19 - 2006-12-06 Fabian Ritzmann
• RE: ACTION 155: Draft proposed clarifications in 2.6 on use of the mtom assertion as an optional assertion Daniel Roth
• RE: Agenda: WS-Policy WG Teleconference 19 - 2006-12-06 Ashok Malhotra
• Agenda: WS-Policy WG Teleconference 19 - 2006-12-06 Paul Cotton
• Re: NEW ISSUE: 3988 [Guidelines] Section 8 Doesn't Illustrate How to Design an Assertion Maryann Hondo
• Re: NEW ISSUE: 3989 [Guidelines] Suggested Format Maryann Hondo
• Re: NEW ISSUE: [Guidelines] Clarify if Section 7 on defining new policy attachment mechanisms is necessary Maryann Hondo

Wednesday, 29 November 2006

• Re: ACTION 155: Draft proposed clarifications in 2.6 on use of the mtom assertion as an optional assertion Frederick Hirsch
• RE: WSDL 1.1 element identifiers review Paul Cotton
• WSDL 1.1 element identifiers review Ashok Malhotra
• WSDL 1.1 element identifiers review Paul Cotton
• RE: RE: WSDL 1.1 element identifiers extensions, not defined Paul Cotton
• Re: Action Item re affects from nesting of policy assertions Tom Rutt
• NEW ISSUE: 3985 [Guidelines] Section 5.3.1 should use the definition of policy assertion parameters from the Framework spec Daniel Roth
• ACTION 155: Draft proposed clarifications in 2.6 on use of the mtom assertion as an optional assertion Daniel Roth
• Re: Agenda: WS-Policy WG Teleconference 18 - 2006-11-29 Charlton Barreto
• regrets from Toufic Boubez (by proxy) Maryann Hondo
• Re: Agenda: WS-Policy WG Teleconference 18 - 2006-11-29 Mark Little

Monday, 27 November 2006

• Action Item re affects from nesting of policy assertions Tom Rutt
• Agenda: WS-Policy WG Teleconference 18 - 2006-11-29 Christopher B Ferris

Saturday, 25 November 2006

• RE: WSDL 1.1 element identifiers extensions, not defined David Orchard

Friday, 24 November 2006

• WSDL 1.1 element identifiers extensions, not defined David Orchard

Saturday, 18 November 2006

• RE: Assertion guidelines new version Asir Vedamuthu
• NEW ISSUE: 3990 [Guidelines] Content in Section 5.7 is unclear Daniel Roth
• NEW ISSUE: 3989 [Guidelines] Suggested Format Asir Vedamuthu
• NEW ISSUE: 3988 [Guidelines] Section 8 Doesn't Illustrate How to Design an Assertion Asir Vedamuthu
• NEW ISSUE: 3987 [Guidelines] Section 5.9 - Lifecycle of Assertions? Asir Vedamuthu
• NEW ISSUE: 3986 [Guidelines] Parameter vs. Nested Policy Decision at Domain Level? Asir Vedamuthu
• NEW ISSUE: 3984 [Guidelines] Assertion Parameters vs. Name Value Pairs Asir Vedamuthu
• NEW ISSUE: 3983 [Guidelines] Use 'Assertion Author (s)' Consistently Asir Vedamuthu
• NEW ISSUE: 3981 [Guidelines] Section 4 Relevance to Assertion Design Asir Vedamuthu
• NEW ISSUE: 3980 [Guidelines] Should Assume Basic Understanding of WS-Policy Asir Vedamuthu
• NEW ISSUE: 3982 [Guidelines] The introduction should state that the document only targets policy assertion authors Daniel Roth
• NEW ISSUE: 3979 [Guidelines] Clarify the guidance in section 5.9.1 on referencing policy Daniel Roth
• RE: NEW ISSUE: 3978 [Guidelines] Clarify if Section 7 on defining new policy attachment mechanisms is necessary Daniel Roth
• NEW ISSUE: [Guidelines] Clarify if Section 7 on defining new policy attachment mechanisms is necessary Daniel Roth

Friday, 17 November 2006

• Re: Action-151 (was RE: Proposed Resolution - 3721 and 3789 Sergey Beryozkin
• Action-151 (was RE: Proposed Resolution - 3721 and 3789 Asir Vedamuthu

Wednesday, 15 November 2006

• RE: Updated WSDL EI Yalcinalp, Umit
• Updated WSDL EI David Orchard
• Re: Updated wsd11elementidentifers Felix Sasaki
• [VER 2] Agenda: WS-Policy WG Teleconference 17 - 2006-11-15 Paul Cotton
• Regrets for tomorrow Toufic Boubez
• RE: Updated wsd11elementidentifers David Orchard
• RE: Updated wsd11elementidentifers Yalcinalp, Umit
• RE: Updated wsd11elementidentifers David Orchard

Tuesday, 14 November 2006

• Re: Updated wsd11elementidentifers Felix Sasaki
• Agenda: WS-Policy WG Teleconference 17 - 2006-11-15 Paul Cotton

Monday, 13 November 2006

• RE: Updated wsd11elementidentifers Ashok Malhotra
• Re: NEW ISSUE: Change optional example from MTOM to security (Gui delines and Primer) Frederick Hirsch
• RE: NEW ISSUE: Change optional example from MTOM to security (Gui delines and Primer) Prasad Yendluri
• RE: NEW ISSUE: Change optional example from MTOM to security (Gui delines and Primer) Prasad Yendluri
• Re: NEW ISSUE: Change optional example from MTOM to security (Guidelines and Primer) William Henry
• RE: Updated wsd11elementidentifers Ashok Malhotra
• Re: NEW ISSUE: Change optional example from MTOM to security (Guidelines and Primer) Frederick Hirsch

Saturday, 11 November 2006

• Editors Drafts Nov 9th ready David Orchard

Friday, 10 November 2006

• Updated wsd11elementidentifers David Orchard

Thursday, 9 November 2006

• Re: NEW ISSUE: Change optional example from MTOM to security (Guidelines and Primer) William Henry
• NEW ISSUE 3966: Inconsistency in Primer re: PolicyReference Extensibility Monica J. Martin
• Concrete Proposal Around 3619 Glen Daniels
• On resolutions for 3721 and 3789 Felix Sasaki
• RE: Rough draft of WSDL 1.1 Element Identifiers Note Yalcinalp, Umit
• Re: Proposed Resolution - 3721 and 3789 Sergey Beryozkin
• Rough draft of WSDL 1.1 Element Identifiers Note David Orchard
• NEW ISSUE 3965: Clarify text surrounding PolicyReference and for usage of wsp:Name attribute (primer) Fabian Ritzmann

Wednesday, 8 November 2006

• RE: Proposed Resolution - 3721 and 3789 Paul Cotton
• Proposed Resolution - 3721 and 3789 Asir Vedamuthu
• Issue 3961 (was RE: editorial bug in framework section 4.1 Asir Vedamuthu
• application/wspolicy+xml Philippe Le Hegaret
• editorial bug in framework section 4.1 Tom Rutt
• Re: Notes - Treasure Hunt - Nov 7th 2006 Sergey Beryozkin
• Re: Notes - Treasure Hunt - Nov 7th 2006 Sergey Beryozkin
• Re: Notes - Treasure Hunt - Nov 7th 2006 Sergey Beryozkin
• Re: Notes - Treasure Hunt - Nov 7th 2006 Sergey Beryozkin
• Notes - Treasure Hunt - Nov 7th 2006 Daniel Roth
• RE: NEW ISSUE: New Attribute keyword to identify 'local' policies #3721 Yalcinalp, Umit
• RE: Issue 3794 proposal Yalcinalp, Umit

Tuesday, 7 November 2006

• Re: NEW ISSUE: New Attribute keyword to identify 'local' policies #3721 William Henry
• RE: NEW ISSUE :Clarify usage of assertions with no behavioral requirements on the requester Yalcinalp, Umit
• Re: NEW ISSUE :Clarify usage of assertions with no behavioral requirements on the requester Sergey Beryozkin
• Re: NEW ISSUE :Clarify usage of assertions with no behavioral requirements on the requester Sergey Beryozkin
• RE: NEW ISSUE :Clarify usage of assertions with no behavioral requirements on the requester Yalcinalp, Umit
• Re: NEW ISSUE :Clarify usage of assertions with no behavioral requirements on the requester Sergey Beryozkin
• RE: NEW ISSUE :Clarify usage of assertions with no behavioral requirements on the requester Yalcinalp, Umit
• RE: ISSUE (3639) Which policy alternative was selected? Daniel Roth
• Re: NEW ISSUE :Clarify usage of assertions with no behavioral requirements on the requester Sergey Beryozkin
• discussion on 3619 Maryann Hondo

Monday, 6 November 2006

• Re: NEW ISSUE :Clarify usage of assertions with no behavioral requirements on the requester Sergey Beryozkin

Tuesday, 7 November 2006

• Re: Policy alternatives (Was : Clarify usage...) Sergey Beryozkin
• RE: Proposed Resolution: 3599 and 3730 Asir Vedamuthu
• Proposed Resolution: 3599 and 3730 Asir Vedamuthu
• [VER3] Agenda: WS-Policy WG F2F 16 - 2006-11-07 to 2006-11-09 Christopher B Ferris

Monday, 6 November 2006

• Re: ISSUE (3639) Which policy alternative was selected? Frederick Hirsch
• RE: Policy alternatives (Was : Clarify usage...) Ashok Malhotra
• Re: ISSUE (3639) Which policy alternative was selected? Frederick Hirsch
• Re: Policy alternatives (Was : Clarify usage...) Frederick Hirsch
• Regrets for Tues William Henry
• [VER2] Agenda: WS-Policy WG F2F 16 - 2006-11-07 to 2006-11-09 Christopher B Ferris

Saturday, 4 November 2006

• NEW ISSUE: Remove language that use of security policy assertions forces nested assertions for other domains (guidelines) Frederick Hirsch
• NEW ISSUE: Change optional example from MTOM to security (Guidelines and Primer) Frederick Hirsch
• RE: NEW ISSUE :Clarify usage of assertions with no behavioral requirements on the requester Yalcinalp, Umit

Friday, 3 November 2006

• Fourth Editors' Drafts Asir Vedamuthu
• RE: ISSUE (3639) Which policy alternative was selected? Glen Daniels
• RE: ISSUE (3639) Which policy alternative was selected? Dale Moberg
• Re: ISSUE (3639) Which policy alternative was selected? Sergey Beryozkin
• Agenda: WS-Policy WG F2F 16 - 2006-11-07 to 2006-11-09 Paul Cotton
• Re: ISSUE (3639) Which policy alternative was selected? Sergey Beryozkin
• Re: ISSUE (3639) Which policy alternative was selected? Sergey Beryozkin
• RE: NEW ISSUE: New Attribute keyword to identify 'local' policies #3721 Asir Vedamuthu

Thursday, 2 November 2006

• Issue 3794 proposal Frederick Hirsch
• Re: Guidelines Document Frederick Hirsch
• RE: ISSUE (3639) Which policy alternative was selected? Dale Moberg
• RE: ISSUE (3639) Which policy alternative was selected? Glen Daniels
• RE: ISSUE (3639) Which policy alternative was selected? Yalcinalp, Umit
• RE: ISSUE (3639) Which policy alternative was selected? Prasad Yendluri
• RE: ACTION-69 - Nov 3rd Editors' Drafts Asir Vedamuthu
• ACTION-69 - Nov 3rd Editors' Drafts Asir Vedamuthu
• RE: ISSUE (3639) Which policy alternative was selected? Glen Daniels
• RE: ISSUE (3639) Which policy alternative was selected? Daniel Roth
• Re: WWW2007 cfp Mark Little

Wednesday, 1 November 2006

• Re: NEW ISSUE :Clarify usage of assertions with no behavioral requirements on the requester Sergey Beryozkin
• RE: [Bug 3793] Add example about policies in the context of relationships between multiple entities Paul Cotton
• WWW2007 cfp Mark Little
• WS-Policy f2f apologies Mark Little
• Issue 3564 (was RE: Assertion guidelines new version Asir Vedamuthu
• [VER 3] Agenda: WS-Policy WG Teleconference 15 - 2006-11-01 Paul Cotton
• Re: ISSUE (3639) Which policy alternative was selected? Frederick Hirsch
• Re: ISSUE (3639) Which policy alternative was selected? Fabian Ritzmann
• Re: NEW ISSUE: New Attribute keyword to identify 'local' policies #3721 Sergey Beryozkin
• Re: NEW ISSUE :Clarify usage of assertions with no behavioral req uirements on the requester Sergey Beryozkin
• Re: NEW ISSUE: New Attribute keyword to identify 'local' policies #3721 William Henry
• Assertion guidelines new version Yalcinalp, Umit
• Re: NEW ISSUE :Clarify usage of assertions with no behavioral requirements on the requester William Henry

Tuesday, 31 October 2006

• Re: ISSUE (3639) Which policy alternative was selected? Sergey Beryozkin

Wednesday, 1 November 2006

• RE: NEW ISSUE: New Attribute keyword to identify 'local' policies #3721 Yalcinalp, Umit
• Re: NEW ISSUE: New Attribute keyword to identify 'local' policies #3721 William Henry
• Editors Action 12 Resolution Asir Vedamuthu
• RE: RE: Revised proposal for Bug 3730 Asir Vedamuthu

Last message date: Thursday, 30 November 2006 23:39:59 UTC