Ashok Malhotra
Asir Vedamuthu
- RE: NEW ISSUE: 3989 [Guidelines] Suggested Format (Thursday, 30 November)
- RE: Assertion guidelines new version (Saturday, 18 November)
- NEW ISSUE: 3989 [Guidelines] Suggested Format (Saturday, 18 November)
- NEW ISSUE: 3988 [Guidelines] Section 8 Doesn't Illustrate How to Design an Assertion (Saturday, 18 November)
- NEW ISSUE: 3987 [Guidelines] Section 5.9 - Lifecycle of Assertions? (Saturday, 18 November)
- NEW ISSUE: 3986 [Guidelines] Parameter vs. Nested Policy Decision at Domain Level? (Saturday, 18 November)
- NEW ISSUE: 3984 [Guidelines] Assertion Parameters vs. Name Value Pairs (Saturday, 18 November)
- NEW ISSUE: 3983 [Guidelines] Use 'Assertion Author (s)' Consistently (Saturday, 18 November)
- NEW ISSUE: 3981 [Guidelines] Section 4 Relevance to Assertion Design (Saturday, 18 November)
- NEW ISSUE: 3980 [Guidelines] Should Assume Basic Understanding of WS-Policy (Saturday, 18 November)
- Action-151 (was RE: Proposed Resolution - 3721 and 3789 (Friday, 17 November)
- Proposed Resolution - 3721 and 3789 (Wednesday, 8 November)
- Issue 3961 (was RE: editorial bug in framework section 4.1 (Wednesday, 8 November)
- RE: Proposed Resolution: 3599 and 3730 (Tuesday, 7 November)
- Proposed Resolution: 3599 and 3730 (Tuesday, 7 November)
- Fourth Editors' Drafts (Friday, 3 November)
- RE: NEW ISSUE: New Attribute keyword to identify 'local' policies #3721 (Friday, 3 November)
- RE: ACTION-69 - Nov 3rd Editors' Drafts (Thursday, 2 November)
- ACTION-69 - Nov 3rd Editors' Drafts (Thursday, 2 November)
- Issue 3564 (was RE: Assertion guidelines new version (Wednesday, 1 November)
- Editors Action 12 Resolution (Wednesday, 1 November)
- RE: RE: Revised proposal for Bug 3730 (Wednesday, 1 November)
Charlton Barreto
Christopher B Ferris
Dale Moberg
Daniel Roth
- RE: ACTION 155: Draft proposed clarifications in 2.6 on use of the mtom assertion as an optional assertion (Thursday, 30 November)
- RE: ACTION 155: Draft proposed clarifications in 2.6 on use of the mtom assertion as an optional assertion (Thursday, 30 November)
- NEW ISSUE: 3985 [Guidelines] Section 5.3.1 should use the definition of policy assertion parameters from the Framework spec (Wednesday, 29 November)
- ACTION 155: Draft proposed clarifications in 2.6 on use of the mtom assertion as an optional assertion (Wednesday, 29 November)
- NEW ISSUE: 3990 [Guidelines] Content in Section 5.7 is unclear (Saturday, 18 November)
- NEW ISSUE: 3982 [Guidelines] The introduction should state that the document only targets policy assertion authors (Saturday, 18 November)
- NEW ISSUE: 3979 [Guidelines] Clarify the guidance in section 5.9.1 on referencing policy (Saturday, 18 November)
- RE: NEW ISSUE: 3978 [Guidelines] Clarify if Section 7 on defining new policy attachment mechanisms is necessary (Saturday, 18 November)
- NEW ISSUE: [Guidelines] Clarify if Section 7 on defining new policy attachment mechanisms is necessary (Saturday, 18 November)
- Notes - Treasure Hunt - Nov 7th 2006 (Wednesday, 8 November)
- RE: ISSUE (3639) Which policy alternative was selected? (Tuesday, 7 November)
- RE: ISSUE (3639) Which policy alternative was selected? (Thursday, 2 November)
David Orchard
- RE: WSDL 1.1 element identifiers extensions, not defined (Saturday, 25 November)
- WSDL 1.1 element identifiers extensions, not defined (Friday, 24 November)
- Updated WSDL EI (Wednesday, 15 November)
- RE: Updated wsd11elementidentifers (Wednesday, 15 November)
- RE: Updated wsd11elementidentifers (Wednesday, 15 November)
- Editors Drafts Nov 9th ready (Saturday, 11 November)
- Updated wsd11elementidentifers (Friday, 10 November)
- Rough draft of WSDL 1.1 Element Identifiers Note (Thursday, 9 November)
Fabian Ritzmann
Felix Sasaki
Frederick Hirsch
- Re: ACTION 155: Draft proposed clarifications in 2.6 on use of the mtom assertion as an optional assertion (Thursday, 30 November)
- Re: ACTION 155: Draft proposed clarifications in 2.6 on use of the mtom assertion as an optional assertion (Wednesday, 29 November)
- Re: NEW ISSUE: Change optional example from MTOM to security (Gui delines and Primer) (Monday, 13 November)
- Re: NEW ISSUE: Change optional example from MTOM to security (Guidelines and Primer) (Monday, 13 November)
- Re: ISSUE (3639) Which policy alternative was selected? (Monday, 6 November)
- Re: ISSUE (3639) Which policy alternative was selected? (Monday, 6 November)
- Re: Policy alternatives (Was : Clarify usage...) (Monday, 6 November)
- NEW ISSUE: Remove language that use of security policy assertions forces nested assertions for other domains (guidelines) (Saturday, 4 November)
- NEW ISSUE: Change optional example from MTOM to security (Guidelines and Primer) (Saturday, 4 November)
- Issue 3794 proposal (Thursday, 2 November)
- Re: Guidelines Document (Thursday, 2 November)
- Re: ISSUE (3639) Which policy alternative was selected? (Wednesday, 1 November)
Glen Daniels
Mark Little
Maryann Hondo
Monica J. Martin
Paul Cotton
- Agenda: WS-Policy WG Teleconference 19 - 2006-12-06 (Thursday, 30 November)
- RE: WSDL 1.1 element identifiers review (Wednesday, 29 November)
- WSDL 1.1 element identifiers review (Wednesday, 29 November)
- RE: RE: WSDL 1.1 element identifiers extensions, not defined (Wednesday, 29 November)
- [VER 2] Agenda: WS-Policy WG Teleconference 17 - 2006-11-15 (Wednesday, 15 November)
- Agenda: WS-Policy WG Teleconference 17 - 2006-11-15 (Tuesday, 14 November)
- RE: Proposed Resolution - 3721 and 3789 (Wednesday, 8 November)
- Agenda: WS-Policy WG F2F 16 - 2006-11-07 to 2006-11-09 (Friday, 3 November)
- RE: [Bug 3793] Add example about policies in the context of relationships between multiple entities (Wednesday, 1 November)
- [VER 3] Agenda: WS-Policy WG Teleconference 15 - 2006-11-01 (Wednesday, 1 November)
Philippe Le Hegaret
Prasad Yendluri
Sergey Beryozkin
- Re: Action-151 (was RE: Proposed Resolution - 3721 and 3789 (Friday, 17 November)
- Re: Proposed Resolution - 3721 and 3789 (Thursday, 9 November)
- Re: Notes - Treasure Hunt - Nov 7th 2006 (Wednesday, 8 November)
- Re: Notes - Treasure Hunt - Nov 7th 2006 (Wednesday, 8 November)
- Re: Notes - Treasure Hunt - Nov 7th 2006 (Wednesday, 8 November)
- Re: Notes - Treasure Hunt - Nov 7th 2006 (Wednesday, 8 November)
- Re: NEW ISSUE :Clarify usage of assertions with no behavioral requirements on the requester (Tuesday, 7 November)
- Re: NEW ISSUE :Clarify usage of assertions with no behavioral requirements on the requester (Tuesday, 7 November)
- Re: NEW ISSUE :Clarify usage of assertions with no behavioral requirements on the requester (Tuesday, 7 November)
- Re: NEW ISSUE :Clarify usage of assertions with no behavioral requirements on the requester (Tuesday, 7 November)
- Re: NEW ISSUE :Clarify usage of assertions with no behavioral requirements on the requester (Monday, 6 November)
- Re: Policy alternatives (Was : Clarify usage...) (Tuesday, 7 November)
- Re: ISSUE (3639) Which policy alternative was selected? (Friday, 3 November)
- Re: ISSUE (3639) Which policy alternative was selected? (Friday, 3 November)
- Re: ISSUE (3639) Which policy alternative was selected? (Friday, 3 November)
- Re: NEW ISSUE :Clarify usage of assertions with no behavioral requirements on the requester (Wednesday, 1 November)
- Re: NEW ISSUE: New Attribute keyword to identify 'local' policies #3721 (Wednesday, 1 November)
- Re: NEW ISSUE :Clarify usage of assertions with no behavioral req uirements on the requester (Wednesday, 1 November)
- Re: ISSUE (3639) Which policy alternative was selected? (Tuesday, 31 October)
Tom Rutt
Toufic Boubez
William Henry
Yalcinalp, Umit
- RE: NEW ISSUE: 3989 [Guidelines] Suggested Format (Thursday, 30 November)
- RE: Updated WSDL EI (Wednesday, 15 November)
- RE: Updated wsd11elementidentifers (Wednesday, 15 November)
- RE: Rough draft of WSDL 1.1 Element Identifiers Note (Thursday, 9 November)
- RE: NEW ISSUE: New Attribute keyword to identify 'local' policies #3721 (Wednesday, 8 November)
- RE: Issue 3794 proposal (Wednesday, 8 November)
- RE: NEW ISSUE :Clarify usage of assertions with no behavioral requirements on the requester (Tuesday, 7 November)
- RE: NEW ISSUE :Clarify usage of assertions with no behavioral requirements on the requester (Tuesday, 7 November)
- RE: NEW ISSUE :Clarify usage of assertions with no behavioral requirements on the requester (Tuesday, 7 November)
- RE: NEW ISSUE :Clarify usage of assertions with no behavioral requirements on the requester (Saturday, 4 November)
- RE: ISSUE (3639) Which policy alternative was selected? (Thursday, 2 November)
- Assertion guidelines new version (Wednesday, 1 November)
- RE: NEW ISSUE: New Attribute keyword to identify 'local' policies #3721 (Wednesday, 1 November)
Last message date: Thursday, 30 November 2006 23:39:59 UTC