- From: Felix Sasaki <fsasaki@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2006 01:34:51 +0900
- To: David Orchard <dorchard@bea.com>
- Cc: Ashok Malhotra <ashok.malhotra@oracle.com>, public-ws-policy@w3.org
David Orchard wrote: > +1 to Ashok's wording, -1 to Felix's amendment. > > I think the document very specifically defines a syntax. It does not > "propose" a syntax. Whether the defined syntax is recommended or just > acknowleged or of moderate historical interest, or whatever is separate > from what the contents of the document does. > > The status of the document is the thing that determines the > "Recommendation" or "Note"ness of the "definition". > > Let's not push the status of the document into the contents. That way > leads to madness - like "notes" only containing Shoulds and never Musts, > etc. Actually I also wanted to convince you to get rid of "normative references" ... but this is of minor importance, so I'll drop it. Felix > > Cheers, > Dave > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: public-ws-policy-request@w3.org >> [mailto:public-ws-policy-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Felix Sasaki >> Sent: Tuesday, November 14, 2006 3:41 PM >> To: Ashok Malhotra >> Cc: public-ws-policy@w3.org >> Subject: Re: Updated wsd11elementidentifers >> >> >> Ashok Malhotra wrote: >>> Dave: >>> I have made a few comments in the attached Word document. >> On "Reword Abstract to read:" >> "This note defines a syntax to identify individual elements in a WSDL >> 1.1 document." >> This is a bit confusing: a W3C Working Group Note has not the >> "normative power" to define something. I'd propose to replace >> "defines" with "proposes". >> >> Felix >> >>> There are also minor reference glitches etc. which I have >> not mentioned. >>> Let me know if you want me to make the changes. >>> >>> All the best, Ashok >>> >>> >>>> -----Original Message----- >>>> From: public-ws-policy-request@w3.org >>>> [mailto:public-ws-policy-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of David Orchard >>>> Sent: Friday, November 10, 2006 11:41 AM >>>> To: public-ws-policy@w3.org >>>> Subject: Updated wsd11elementidentifers >>>> >>>> >>>> At >>>> http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2006/ws/policy/wsdl11eleme >>>> ntidentifi >>>> ers.html >>>> >>>> I did a bunch of the updates that were mentioned in the meeting: >>>> >>>> 1. added mention of diff from wsdl2.0 component ids vs >> element ids 2. >>>> moved example URIs into sample doc 3. fixed typos in table >>>> >>>> Cheers, >>>> Dave >>>> >>>> >>>> >> >> >
Received on Wednesday, 15 November 2006 17:08:31 UTC