- From: Daniel Roth <Daniel.Roth@microsoft.com>
- Date: Fri, 17 Nov 2006 17:32:52 -0800
- To: Daniel Roth <Daniel.Roth@microsoft.com>, "public-ws-policy@w3.org" <public-ws-policy@w3.org>
Received on Saturday, 18 November 2006 01:33:03 UTC
Adding issue number to subject. Daniel Roth ________________________________ From: Daniel Roth Sent: Friday, November 17, 2006 5:31 PM To: public-ws-policy@w3.org Subject: NEW ISSUE: [Guidelines] Clarify if Section 7 on defining new policy attachment mechanisms is necessary http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=3978 Title: [Guidelines] Clarify if Section 7 on defining new policy attachment mechanisms is necessary Description: Section 7 in the Guidelines document currently discusses guidelines for authoring new policy attachment mechanisms [1]. These guidelines are not relevant to policy assertion authors. Does the working group plan on providing guidance on creating new policy attachment mechanisms? If no, then this section should be removed. If yes, then this section needs to be reviewed for completeness. Justification: The Guidelines doc is specific to policy assertion authors. Providing guidance on creating new attachment mechanisms seems like a lower priority. Target: Guidelines for Policy Assertion Authors Proposal: Remove Section 7. [1] http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2006/ws/policy/ws-policy-guidelines.html?rev=1.8&content-type=text/html;%20charset=utf-8#best-practices-attachment
Received on Saturday, 18 November 2006 01:33:03 UTC