I observe that there are several facets to this open item and I would like the working group to consider the following: 1) The WS-Addressing group is not willing to take on additional work items at this time beyond pointing to our specs [http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/addr/cr-issues/Overview.html#cr34] 2) The example we give could be misleading rather than clarifying .[http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-policy/2006Sep/0072.html] 3)There is a new proposal to consider a more general mechanism for domain expressions in external attachments[ policy attachment section 3.4] that identify policy subjects [http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-policy/2006Nov/0048.html] Therefore, I propose that we close this bug with no additional action. The guidelines document (section 2) recommends that policy authors understand and declare their policy subjects and EPRs are just another possible subject. We then recommend that the WS-Addressing group review our CR drafts and our non-normative guidelines and reference those appropriately. MaryannReceived on Tuesday, 7 November 2006 12:00:57 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:33:18 UTC