RE: Updated wsd11elementidentifers

+1 to Ashok's wording, -1 to Felix's amendment.

I think the document very specifically defines a syntax.  It does not
"propose" a syntax.  Whether the defined syntax is recommended or just
acknowleged or of moderate historical interest, or whatever is separate
from what the contents of the document does.   

The status of the document is the thing that determines the
"Recommendation" or "Note"ness of the "definition".  

Let's not push the status of the document into the contents.  That way
leads to madness - like "notes" only containing Shoulds and never Musts,
etc.

Cheers,
Dave 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: public-ws-policy-request@w3.org 
> [mailto:public-ws-policy-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Felix Sasaki
> Sent: Tuesday, November 14, 2006 3:41 PM
> To: Ashok Malhotra
> Cc: public-ws-policy@w3.org
> Subject: Re: Updated wsd11elementidentifers
> 
> 
> Ashok Malhotra wrote:
> > Dave:
> > I have made a few comments in the attached Word document.
> 
> On "Reword Abstract to read:"
> "This note defines a syntax to identify individual elements in a WSDL
> 1.1 document."
> This is a bit confusing: a W3C Working Group Note has not the 
> "normative power" to define something. I'd propose to replace 
> "defines" with "proposes".
> 
> Felix
> 
> > There are also minor reference glitches etc. which I have 
> not mentioned.
> > Let me know if you want me to make the changes.
> > 
> > All the best, Ashok
> >  
> > 
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: public-ws-policy-request@w3.org 
> >> [mailto:public-ws-policy-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of David Orchard
> >> Sent: Friday, November 10, 2006 11:41 AM
> >> To: public-ws-policy@w3.org
> >> Subject: Updated wsd11elementidentifers
> >>
> >>
> >> At
> >> http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2006/ws/policy/wsdl11eleme
> >> ntidentifi
> >> ers.html
> >>
> >> I did a bunch of the updates that were mentioned in the meeting:
> >>
> >> 1. added mention of diff from wsdl2.0 component ids vs 
> element ids 2. 
> >> moved example URIs into sample doc 3. fixed typos in table
> >>
> >> Cheers,
> >> Dave
> >>
> >>
> >>
> 
> 
>

Received on Wednesday, 15 November 2006 00:25:12 UTC