public-webauthn@w3.org from June 2022 by author

=JeffH

• [w3c/webauthn] 91473c: Non-modal "conditionally mediated" UI (#1576) (Wednesday, 29 June)
• [w3c/webauthn] 8ad944: Non-modal "conditionally mediated" UI (#1576) (Wednesday, 29 June)

AadaEa via GitHub

• Re: [webauthn] Add a way to use webauthn without Javascript (#1255) (Friday, 24 June)

Ackermann Yuriy

• Re: [webauthn] Which "pubKeyCredParams" to use? (#1757) (Tuesday, 28 June)

Adam Langley

• [w3c/webauthn] 656e61: Add "hybrid" as a transport. (Friday, 24 June)
• [w3c/webauthn] 27d089: Introduce unsigned extension outputs and use it to... (Wednesday, 22 June)
• [w3c/webauthn] 36c7f9: Change "create any credentials" to "create any ass... (Friday, 17 June)

Adam Langley via GitHub

• Re: [webauthn] Platform authentication registration promotion when the user has authenticated with the external authenticator (#1759) (Thursday, 30 June)
• Re: [webauthn] non-modal "conditionally mediated" UI (#1576) (Wednesday, 29 June)
• Re: [webauthn] Platform authentication registration promotion when the user has authenticated with the external authenticator (#1759) (Wednesday, 29 June)
• Re: [webauthn] Platform authentication registration promotion when the user has authenticated with the external authenticator (#1759) (Wednesday, 29 June)
• [webauthn] Pull Request: Add "hybrid" as a transport. (Friday, 24 June)
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by agl (Friday, 24 June)
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by agl (Wednesday, 22 June)
• [webauthn] Merged Pull Request: Introduce unsigned extension outputs in DPK PR (Wednesday, 22 June)
• Re: [webauthn] How to know if a user has already registered a device? (#1749) (Sunday, 19 June)
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by agl (Friday, 17 June)
• Re: [webauthn] backup states in authenticator data (#1695) (Thursday, 9 June)
• Re: [webauthn] Read the PRF extension. (#1732) (Wednesday, 1 June)

Anders Rundgren via GitHub

• Re: [webauthn] Which "pubKeyCredParams" to use? (#1757) (Wednesday, 29 June)

Andrey Paramonov via GitHub

• Re: [webauthn] Clarify how a user can authenticate from multiple devices (#151) (Wednesday, 29 June)
• Re: [webauthn] Clarify how a user can authenticate from multiple devices (#151) (Tuesday, 28 June)
• Re: [webauthn] How to know if a user has already registered a device? (#1749) (Sunday, 26 June)

Arnar Birgisson via GitHub

• Re: [webauthn] Introduce unsigned extension outputs in DPK PR (#1753) (Wednesday, 22 June)
• [webauthn] Pull Request: Introduce unsigned extension outputs in DPK PR (Wednesday, 22 June)
• Re: [webauthn] Introduce unsigned extension outputs in DPK PR (#1753) (Wednesday, 22 June)
• [webauthn] Closed Pull Request: Introduce unsigned extension outputs in DPK PR (Wednesday, 22 June)
• [webauthn] Pull Request: Introduce unsigned extension outputs in DPK PR (Wednesday, 22 June)

Arnaud Dagnelies via GitHub

• Re: [webauthn] Which "pubKeyCredParams" to use? (#1757) (Wednesday, 29 June)
• Re: [webauthn] Which "pubKeyCredParams" to use? (#1757) (Wednesday, 29 June)
• [webauthn] Which "pubKeyCredParams" to use? (#1757) (Tuesday, 28 June)
• Re: [webauthn] How to know if a user has already registered a device? (#1749) (Saturday, 25 June)
• Re: [webauthn] Spec abstract is out of date on the eve of multi-device credentials and cross-device auth (#1743) (Tuesday, 21 June)
• Re: [webauthn] Split the standard by focus driven use cases. (#1751) (Tuesday, 21 June)
• Re: [webauthn] How to know if a user has already registered a device? (#1749) (Tuesday, 21 June)
• Re: [webauthn] New PublicKeyCredential methods for JSON (de)serialization (#1703) (Monday, 20 June)
• Re: [webauthn] How to know if a user has already registered a device? (#1749) (Monday, 20 June)
• Re: [webauthn] How to know if a user has already registered a device? (#1749) (Monday, 20 June)
• Re: [webauthn] New PublicKeyCredential methods for JSON (de)serialization (#1703) (Sunday, 19 June)
• [webauthn] How to know if a user has already registered a device? (#1749) (Sunday, 19 June)
• Re: [webauthn] New PublicKeyCredential methods for JSON (de)serialization (#1703) (Sunday, 19 June)
• Re: [webauthn] New PublicKeyCredential methods for JSON (de)serialization (#1703) (Saturday, 18 June)

Chad Killingsworth via GitHub

• Re: [webauthn] Should an RP be able to provide finer grained authenticator filtering in attestation options? (#1688) (Tuesday, 7 June)
• Re: [webauthn] Should an RP be able to provide finer grained authenticator filtering in attestation options? (#1688) (Monday, 6 June)
• Re: [webauthn] Should an RP be able to provide finer grained authenticator filtering in attestation options? (#1688) (Monday, 6 June)
• Re: [webauthn] Should an RP be able to provide finer grained authenticator filtering in attestation options? (#1688) (Monday, 6 June)
• Re: [webauthn] Should an RP be able to provide finer grained authenticator filtering in attestation options? (#1688) (Monday, 6 June)

Daniel Nagy via GitHub

• Re: [webauthn] Clarify how a user can authenticate from multiple devices (#151) (Friday, 24 June)
• Re: [webauthn] Clarify how a user can authenticate from multiple devices (#151) (Friday, 24 June)

David Waite via GitHub

• Re: [webauthn] New PublicKeyCredential methods for JSON (de)serialization (#1703) (Sunday, 19 June)
• Re: [webauthn] New PublicKeyCredential methods for JSON (de)serialization (#1703) (Saturday, 18 June)
• Re: [webauthn] Discussing mechanisms for enterprise RP's to enforce bound properties of credentials (#1739) (Friday, 10 June)

Diego García via GitHub

• Re: [webauthn] How to declare that a registration only awaits for a Security Key? (#1750) (Monday, 20 June)
• [webauthn] How to declare that a registration only awaits for a Security Key? (#1750) (Monday, 20 June)

Emil Lundberg

• [w3c/webauthn] 74eb1b: Address review comments (Tuesday, 28 June)
• Re: [w3c/webauthn] (Wednesday, 22 June)
• [w3c/webauthn] (Wednesday, 22 June)
• [w3c/webauthn] (Wednesday, 22 June)
• [w3c/webauthn] (Wednesday, 22 June)
• [w3c/webauthn] (Wednesday, 22 June)
• [w3c/webauthn] (Wednesday, 22 June)
• [w3c/webauthn] (Wednesday, 22 June)
• [w3c/webauthn] (Wednesday, 22 June)
• [w3c/webauthn] (Wednesday, 22 June)
• [w3c/webauthn] (Wednesday, 22 June)
• [w3c/webauthn] (Wednesday, 22 June)
• [w3c/webauthn] (Wednesday, 22 June)
• [w3c/webauthn] (Wednesday, 22 June)
• [w3c/webauthn] (Wednesday, 22 June)
• [w3c/webauthn] (Wednesday, 22 June)
• [w3c/webauthn] (Wednesday, 22 June)
• [w3c/webauthn] (Wednesday, 22 June)
• [w3c/webauthn] (Wednesday, 22 June)
• [w3c/webauthn] (Wednesday, 22 June)
• [w3c/webauthn] (Wednesday, 22 June)
• [w3c/webauthn] (Wednesday, 22 June)
• [w3c/webauthn] (Wednesday, 22 June)
• [w3c/webauthn] (Wednesday, 22 June)
• [w3c/webauthn] (Wednesday, 22 June)
• [w3c/webauthn] (Wednesday, 22 June)
• [w3c/webauthn] (Wednesday, 22 June)
• [w3c/webauthn] (Wednesday, 22 June)
• [w3c/webauthn] (Wednesday, 22 June)
• [w3c/webauthn] (Wednesday, 22 June)
• [w3c/webauthn] (Wednesday, 22 June)
• [w3c/webauthn] (Wednesday, 22 June)
• [w3c/webauthn] (Wednesday, 22 June)
• [w3c/webauthn] (Wednesday, 22 June)
• [w3c/webauthn] (Wednesday, 22 June)
• [w3c/webauthn] (Wednesday, 22 June)
• [w3c/webauthn] (Wednesday, 22 June)
• [w3c/webauthn] (Wednesday, 22 June)
• [w3c/webauthn] (Wednesday, 22 June)
• [w3c/webauthn] (Wednesday, 22 June)
• [w3c/webauthn] (Wednesday, 22 June)
• [w3c/webauthn] (Wednesday, 22 June)
• [w3c/webauthn] (Wednesday, 22 June)
• [w3c/webauthn] (Wednesday, 22 June)
• [w3c/webauthn] (Wednesday, 22 June)
• [w3c/webauthn] (Wednesday, 22 June)
• [w3c/webauthn] (Wednesday, 22 June)
• [w3c/webauthn] (Wednesday, 22 June)
• [w3c/webauthn] (Wednesday, 22 June)
• [w3c/webauthn] (Wednesday, 22 June)
• [w3c/webauthn] (Wednesday, 22 June)
• [w3c/webauthn] (Wednesday, 22 June)
• [w3c/webauthn] (Wednesday, 22 June)
• [w3c/webauthn] (Wednesday, 22 June)
• [w3c/webauthn] (Wednesday, 22 June)
• [w3c/webauthn] (Wednesday, 22 June)
• [w3c/webauthn] (Wednesday, 22 June)
• [w3c/webauthn] (Wednesday, 22 June)
• [w3c/webauthn] (Wednesday, 22 June)
• [w3c/webauthn] (Wednesday, 22 June)
• [w3c/webauthn] (Wednesday, 22 June)
• [w3c/webauthn] 750efd: Use "public key credential source" consistently (Wednesday, 22 June)
• [w3c/webauthn] 67f1df: Order Terminology definitions alphabetically (Wednesday, 22 June)
• [w3c/webauthn] 4cd4ed: Remove extraneous brackets (Wednesday, 22 June)
• [w3c/webauthn] c62b77: Use [RP] and [WRP] macros (Tuesday, 14 June)
• [w3c/webauthn] 684cd9: Use [RP] and [WRP] macros (Monday, 13 June)
• [w3c/webauthn] a376e3: Fix trailing whitespace (Monday, 13 June)
• [w3c/webauthn] f6db88: Add draft of backup eligibility parameter during r... (Thursday, 9 June)
• [w3c/webauthn] e42a23: Merge pull request #1736 from w3c/issue-1734-sign-... (Thursday, 9 June)
• [w3c/webauthn] (Thursday, 9 June)
• [w3c/webauthn] f9ccf4: Mention constant-zero signature counter in §6.1.1 ... (Thursday, 9 June)

Emil Lundberg via GitHub

• Re: [webauthn] Platform authentication registration promotion when the user has authenticated with the external authenticator (#1759) (Wednesday, 29 June)
• Re: [webauthn] Clarify how a user can authenticate from multiple devices (#151) (Wednesday, 29 June)
• Re: [webauthn] Which "pubKeyCredParams" to use? (#1757) (Tuesday, 28 June)
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by emlun (Tuesday, 28 June)
• Re: [webauthn] User verification policy leads to ambiguous usage situations. (#1510) (Tuesday, 28 June)
• Re: [webauthn] How to declare that a registration only awaits for a Security Key? (#1750) (Monday, 27 June)
• Re: [webauthn] Clarify how a user can authenticate from multiple devices (#151) (Thursday, 23 June)
• Re: [webauthn] Introduce unsigned extension outputs in DPK PR (#1753) (Wednesday, 22 June)
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by emlun (Wednesday, 22 June)
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by emlun (Wednesday, 22 June)
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by emlun (Wednesday, 22 June)
• [webauthn] Incorrect use of _options_ variable in `create()` and `get()` definitions (#1752) (Tuesday, 21 June)
• Re: [webauthn] non-modal "conditionally mediated" UI (#1576) (Monday, 20 June)
• Re: [webauthn] Better specify what an unknown type credential descriptor being ignored means (#1748) (Monday, 20 June)
• Re: [webauthn] Discussing mechanisms for enterprise RP's to enforce bound properties of credentials (#1739) (Monday, 20 June)
• Re: [webauthn] New PublicKeyCredential methods for JSON (de)serialization (#1703) (Monday, 20 June)
• Re: [webauthn] How to know if a user has already registered a device? (#1749) (Monday, 20 June)
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by emlun (Tuesday, 14 June)
• Re: [webauthn] Refer to options for the user verification check (#1718) (Tuesday, 14 June)
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by emlun (Monday, 13 June)
• [webauthn] Pull Request: Fix some editorial issues (Monday, 13 June)
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by emlun (Monday, 13 June)
• Re: [webauthn] Inconsistencies in backup state flags (#1740) (Monday, 13 June)
• Re: [webauthn] Discussing mechanisms for enterprise RP's to enforce bound properties of credentials (#1739) (Thursday, 9 June)
• [webauthn] Pull Request: DRAFT: Backup eligibility parameter during registration (Thursday, 9 June)
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by emlun (Thursday, 9 June)
• Re: [webauthn] Inconsistencies in backup state flags (#1740) (Thursday, 9 June)
• Re: [webauthn] User verification policy leads to ambiguous usage situations. (#1510) (Thursday, 9 June)
• [webauthn] Merged Pull Request: Mention constant-zero case in §6.1.1 Signature Counter Considerations (Thursday, 9 June)
• Closed: [webauthn] §6.1.1. Signature Counter Considerations does not explicitly mention constant-zero case (#1734) (Thursday, 9 June)
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by emlun (Thursday, 9 June)
• Re: [webauthn] No mechanisms in place for enterprise RP's to opt out of auth with a "shared" passkey (#1739) (Thursday, 9 June)
• Re: [webauthn] Inconsistencies in backup state flags (#1740) (Thursday, 9 June)
• Re: [webauthn] Drop generic client extension processing? (#1730) (Thursday, 9 June)
• Closed: [webauthn] Drop generic client extension processing? (#1730) (Thursday, 9 June)
• Re: [webauthn] Drop generic client extension processing? (#1730) (Thursday, 9 June)
• Re: [webauthn] Refer to options for the user verification check (#1718) (Thursday, 2 June)
• Re: [webauthn] Credential Creation Options are inconsistent to Request (#1716) (Thursday, 2 June)
• Re: [webauthn] Refer to options for the user verification check (#1718) (Wednesday, 1 June)
• [webauthn] Closed Pull Request: Refer to options for the user verification check (Wednesday, 1 June)
• Closed: [webauthn] Credential Creation Options are inconsistent to Request (#1716) (Wednesday, 1 June)
• Re: [webauthn] Credential Creation Options are inconsistent to Request (#1716) (Wednesday, 1 June)
• Closed: [webauthn] Why not make things simple? (#1709) (Wednesday, 1 June)
• Re: [webauthn] Why not make things simple? (#1709) (Wednesday, 1 June)

Felix Magedanz via GitHub

• Re: [webauthn] Clarify how a user can authenticate from multiple devices (#151) (Monday, 27 June)
• Re: [webauthn] Clarify how a user can authenticate from multiple devices (#151) (Friday, 24 June)

Firstyear via GitHub

• Re: [webauthn] Platform authentication registration promotion when the user has authenticated with the external authenticator (#1759) (Thursday, 30 June)
• Re: [webauthn] Which "pubKeyCredParams" to use? (#1757) (Thursday, 30 June)
• Re: [webauthn] Platform authentication registration promotion when the user has authenticated with the external authenticator (#1759) (Thursday, 30 June)
• Re: [webauthn] Discussing mechanisms for enterprise RP's to enforce bound properties of credentials (#1739) (Thursday, 30 June)
• Re: [webauthn] Clarify how a user can authenticate from multiple devices (#151) (Wednesday, 29 June)
• Re: [webauthn] Clarify how a user can authenticate from multiple devices (#151) (Tuesday, 28 June)
• Re: [webauthn] Clarify how a user can authenticate from multiple devices (#151) (Tuesday, 28 June)
• Re: [webauthn] User verification policy leads to ambiguous usage situations. (#1510) (Monday, 27 June)
• Re: [webauthn] User verification policy leads to ambiguous usage situations. (#1510) (Monday, 27 June)
• Re: [webauthn] Clarify how a user can authenticate from multiple devices (#151) (Monday, 27 June)
• Re: [webauthn] Clarify how a user can authenticate from multiple devices (#151) (Monday, 27 June)
• Re: [webauthn] Add a way to use webauthn without Javascript (#1255) (Sunday, 26 June)
• Re: [webauthn] Split the standard by focus driven use cases. (#1751) (Wednesday, 22 June)
• [webauthn] Split the standard by focus driven use cases. (#1751) (Monday, 20 June)
• Re: [webauthn] How to declare that a registration only awaits for a Security Key? (#1750) (Monday, 20 June)
• Re: [webauthn] Discussing mechanisms for enterprise RP's to enforce bound properties of credentials (#1739) (Monday, 20 June)
• Re: [webauthn] How to declare that a registration only awaits for a Security Key? (#1750) (Monday, 20 June)
• Re: [webauthn] Better specify what an unknown type credential descriptor being ignored means (#1748) (Monday, 20 June)
• Re: [webauthn] New PublicKeyCredential methods for JSON (de)serialization (#1703) (Monday, 20 June)
• Re: [webauthn] Discussing mechanisms for enterprise RP's to enforce bound properties of credentials (#1739) (Saturday, 18 June)
• Re: [webauthn] Discussing mechanisms for enterprise RP's to enforce bound properties of credentials (#1739) (Tuesday, 14 June)
• Re: [webauthn] User verification policy leads to ambiguous usage situations. (#1510) (Tuesday, 14 June)
• Re: [webauthn] Inconsistencies in backup state flags (#1740) (Tuesday, 14 June)
• Re: [webauthn] Refer to options for the user verification check (#1718) (Tuesday, 14 June)
• Re: [webauthn] Discussing mechanisms for enterprise RP's to enforce bound properties of credentials (#1739) (Monday, 13 June)
• Re: [webauthn] DRAFT: Backup eligibility parameter during registration (#1744) (Friday, 10 June)
• Re: [webauthn] Discussing mechanisms for enterprise RP's to enforce bound properties of credentials (#1739) (Thursday, 9 June)
• Re: [webauthn] Should an RP be able to provide finer grained authenticator filtering in attestation options? (#1688) (Monday, 6 June)
• Re: [webauthn] Refer to options for the user verification check (#1718) (Thursday, 2 June)
• Re: [webauthn] Credential Creation Options are inconsistent to Request (#1716) (Thursday, 2 June)
• Re: [webauthn] Refer to options for the user verification check (#1718) (Wednesday, 1 June)
• Re: [webauthn] Credential Creation Options are inconsistent to Request (#1716) (Wednesday, 1 June)

github-actions[bot] via GitHub

• [webauthn] new commits pushed by github-actions[bot] (Wednesday, 29 June)
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by github-actions[bot] (Wednesday, 29 June)
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by github-actions[bot] (Thursday, 9 June)
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by github-actions[bot] (Thursday, 9 June)
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by github-actions[bot] (Thursday, 2 June)

James Elliott via GitHub

• Re: [webauthn] Clarify how a user can authenticate from multiple devices (#151) (Tuesday, 28 June)
• Re: [webauthn] Clarify how a user can authenticate from multiple devices (#151) (Thursday, 23 June)
• Re: [webauthn] Should an RP be able to provide finer grained authenticator filtering in attestation options? (#1688) (Monday, 6 June)

John Bradley

• Re: [webauthn] Discussing mechanisms for enterprise RP's to enforce bound properties of credentials (#1739) (Tuesday, 14 June)

John Bradley via GitHub

• Re: [webauthn] Reconsider having unknown "enum" values being ignored (#1738) (Thursday, 9 June)

Ki-Eun Shin via GitHub

• Re: [webauthn] Platform authentication registration promotion when the user has authenticated with the external authenticator (#1759) (Thursday, 30 June)
• Re: [webauthn] Platform authentication registration promotion when the user has authenticated with the external authenticator (#1759) (Thursday, 30 June)
• Re: [webauthn] Platform authentication registration promotion when the user has authenticated with the external authenticator (#1759) (Thursday, 30 June)
• Re: [webauthn] Platform authentication registration promotion when the user has authenticated with the external authenticator (#1759) (Wednesday, 29 June)
• [webauthn] Platform authentication registration promotion when the user has authenticated with the external authenticator (#1759) (Wednesday, 29 June)
• Re: [webauthn] Clarify how a user can authenticate from multiple devices (#151) (Tuesday, 28 June)

lkj4 via GitHub

• Re: [webauthn] Clarify how a user can authenticate from multiple devices (#151) (Thursday, 23 June)

Lucas Garron via GitHub

• Re: [webauthn] Provide request deserialization, response serialization (#1683) (Thursday, 30 June)
• Re: [webauthn] Read the PRF extension. (#1732) (Thursday, 2 June)

Marco Martins via GitHub

• Re: [webauthn] Clarify how a user can authenticate from multiple devices (#151) (Monday, 27 June)

Matthew Miller

• [w3c/webauthn] e106da: Merge pull request #1703 from w3c/masterkale-1683-... (Wednesday, 29 June)
• [w3c/webauthn] (Wednesday, 29 June)
• [w3c/webauthn] 59ecbf: Add sections for new API methods (Wednesday, 29 June)
• [w3c/webauthn] 12e507: Incorporate feedback on wording for exceptions (Monday, 20 June)
• [w3c/webauthn] 88bd8f: Attempt to define rules for when encoding fails (Friday, 10 June)
• [w3c/webauthn] b1b5fd: Incorporate @emlun's copy advice (Friday, 10 June)
• [w3c/webauthn] ae3a7d: Rename options methods from `get-` to `parse-` (Thursday, 9 June)
• [w3c/webauthn] 582b2e: Incorporate Emil's feedback (Thursday, 9 June)

Matthew Miller via GitHub

• Re: [webauthn] Which "pubKeyCredParams" to use? (#1757) (Wednesday, 29 June)
• [webauthn] Merged Pull Request: New PublicKeyCredential methods for JSON (de)serialization (Wednesday, 29 June)
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by MasterKale (Wednesday, 29 June)
• Re: [webauthn] Which "pubKeyCredParams" to use? (#1757) (Tuesday, 28 June)
• Re: [webauthn] Which "pubKeyCredParams" to use? (#1757) (Tuesday, 28 June)
• Re: [webauthn] Split the standard by focus driven use cases. (#1751) (Tuesday, 21 June)
• Re: [webauthn] New PublicKeyCredential methods for JSON (de)serialization (#1703) (Tuesday, 21 June)
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by MasterKale (Monday, 20 June)
• Re: [webauthn] New PublicKeyCredential methods for JSON (de)serialization (#1703) (Monday, 20 June)
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by MasterKale (Friday, 10 June)
• Re: [webauthn] New PublicKeyCredential methods for JSON (de)serialization (#1703) (Friday, 10 June)
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by MasterKale (Friday, 10 June)
• [webauthn] Spec abstract is out of date on the eve of multi-device credentials and cross-device auth (#1743) (Thursday, 9 June)
• Re: [webauthn] No mechanisms in place for enterprise RP's to opt out of auth with a "shared" passkey (#1739) (Thursday, 9 June)
• Re: [webauthn] Advice on language to use? (#1708) (Thursday, 9 June)
• Closed: [webauthn] Advice on language to use? (#1708) (Thursday, 9 June)
• Re: [webauthn] New PublicKeyCredential methods for JSON (de)serialization (#1703) (Thursday, 9 June)
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by MasterKale (Thursday, 9 June)
• Re: [webauthn] No mechanisms in place for enterprise RP's to opt out of auth with a "shared" passkey (#1739) (Thursday, 9 June)
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by MasterKale (Thursday, 9 June)
• Re: [webauthn] New PublicKeyCredential methods for JSON (de)serialization (#1703) (Thursday, 9 June)
• [webauthn] No mechanisms in place for enterprise RP's to opt out of auth with a "shared" passkey (#1739) (Thursday, 9 June)
• Re: [webauthn] New PublicKeyCredential methods for JSON (de)serialization (#1703) (Wednesday, 1 June)

Mike Jones via GitHub

• Re: [webauthn] Reconsider having unknown "enum" values being ignored (#1738) (Thursday, 9 June)
• Re: [webauthn] Reconsider having unknown "enum" values being ignored (#1738) (Thursday, 9 June)

nadalin@prodigy.net

• 06/29/2022 W3C Web Authentication Meeting (Wednesday, 29 June)
• 06/15/2022 W3C Web Authentication Meeting CANCELLED (Wednesday, 15 June)

Nick Steele

• [w3c/webauthn] 3dbff5: Merge pull request #1695 from w3c/timcappalli-1692... (Thursday, 9 June)
• [w3c/webauthn] (Thursday, 9 June)
• [w3c/webauthn] 0c7405: #1692 backup states in authenticator data (Thursday, 9 June)
• [w3c/webauthn] f2fb63: Merge pull request #1737 from w3c/remove-generic-p... (Thursday, 2 June)
• [w3c/webauthn] (Thursday, 2 June)
• [w3c/webauthn] f1f8b5: Remove Generic Passthrough Operations (Thursday, 2 June)
• [w3c/webauthn] f1f8b5: Remove Generic Passthrough Operations (Wednesday, 1 June)

Nick Steele via GitHub

• Re: [webauthn] Attestation on Get Assertion (#1741) (Thursday, 9 June)
• [webauthn] Merged Pull Request: backup states in authenticator data (Thursday, 9 June)
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by nicksteele (Thursday, 9 June)
• Closed: [webauthn] Backup state of credentials (#1692) (Thursday, 9 June)
• [webauthn] Merged Pull Request: Remove Generic Passthrough (Thursday, 2 June)
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by nicksteele (Thursday, 2 June)
• Re: [webauthn] Process to report non-compliant credentials (#1713) (Wednesday, 1 June)
• Closed: [webauthn] Process to report non-compliant credentials (#1713) (Wednesday, 1 June)
• Closed: [webauthn] caBLE for Payments (#1681) (Wednesday, 1 June)
• Re: [webauthn] caBLE for Payments (#1681) (Wednesday, 1 June)
• [webauthn] Pull Request: Remove Generic Passthrough (Wednesday, 1 June)
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by nicksteele (Wednesday, 1 June)

Nina Satragno via GitHub

• [webauthn] Merged Pull Request: non-modal "conditionally mediated" UI (Wednesday, 29 June)
• Closed: [webauthn] Add support for non-modal UI (#1545) (Wednesday, 29 June)
• [webauthn] new commits pushed by nsatragno (Wednesday, 29 June)
• Re: [webauthn] Better specify what an unknown type credential descriptor being ignored means (#1748) (Tuesday, 21 June)
• [webauthn] Better specify what an unknown type credential descriptor being ignored means (#1748) (Friday, 17 June)
• Re: [webauthn] non-modal "conditionally mediated" UI (#1576) (Wednesday, 15 June)
• [webauthn] Conditional Mediation feature discovery should really return a promise (#1745) (Friday, 10 June)
• Re: [webauthn] Reconsider having unknown "enum" values being ignored (#1738) (Friday, 10 June)
• Closed: [webauthn] Reconsider having unknown "enum" values being ignored (#1738) (Friday, 10 June)
• Re: [webauthn] Reconsider having unknown "enum" values being ignored (#1738) (Thursday, 9 June)
• [webauthn] Should enterprise attestation support be flagged explicitly? (#1742) (Thursday, 9 June)
• [webauthn] Reconsider having unknown "enum" values being ignored (#1738) (Wednesday, 8 June)

Nuno Sung via GitHub

• Re: [webauthn] Which "pubKeyCredParams" to use? (#1757) (Thursday, 30 June)

Rolf Lindemann via GitHub

• Re: [webauthn] Discussing mechanisms for enterprise RP's to enforce bound properties of credentials (#1739) (Thursday, 16 June)
• Re: [webauthn] Discussing mechanisms for enterprise RP's to enforce bound properties of credentials (#1739) (Thursday, 16 June)
• Re: [webauthn] Discussing mechanisms for enterprise RP's to enforce bound properties of credentials (#1739) (Tuesday, 14 June)

Sebastian Elfors (IDnow) via GitHub

• Re: [webauthn] Use aPAKE/OPAQUE for FIDO multi-device credentials (PassKey) (#1747) (Wednesday, 29 June)
• [webauthn] Use aPAKE/QPAQUE for FIDO multi-device credentials (PassKey) (#1747) (Wednesday, 15 June)

Shane Weeden via GitHub

• Re: [webauthn] Discussing mechanisms for enterprise RP's to enforce bound properties of credentials (#1739) (Wednesday, 29 June)
• Re: [webauthn] Discussing mechanisms for enterprise RP's to enforce bound properties of credentials (#1739) (Monday, 20 June)
• Re: [webauthn] Discussing mechanisms for enterprise RP's to enforce bound properties of credentials (#1739) (Tuesday, 14 June)
• Re: [webauthn] DRAFT: Backup eligibility parameter during registration (#1744) (Friday, 10 June)
• Re: [webauthn] Discussing mechanisms for enterprise RP's to enforce bound properties of credentials (#1739) (Thursday, 9 June)
• Re: [webauthn] No mechanisms in place for enterprise RP's to opt out of auth with a "shared" passkey (#1739) (Thursday, 9 June)
• Re: [webauthn] Attestation on Get Assertion (#1741) (Thursday, 9 June)
• Re: [webauthn] No mechanisms in place for enterprise RP's to opt out of auth with a "shared" passkey (#1739) (Thursday, 9 June)
• Re: [webauthn] Should an RP be able to provide finer grained authenticator filtering in attestation options? (#1688) (Monday, 6 June)
• Re: [webauthn] Should an RP be able to provide finer grained authenticator filtering in attestation options? (#1688) (Monday, 6 June)
• Re: [webauthn] Should an RP be able to provide finer grained authenticator filtering in attestation options? (#1688) (Monday, 6 June)
• Re: [webauthn] Should an RP be able to provide finer grained authenticator filtering in attestation options? (#1688) (Monday, 6 June)
• Re: [webauthn] Should an RP be able to provide finer grained authenticator filtering in attestation options? (#1688) (Monday, 6 June)

Silvan Mosberger via GitHub

• Re: [webauthn] Refer to options for the user verification check (#1718) (Monday, 13 June)

Tim Cappalli via GitHub

• Re: [webauthn] Which "pubKeyCredParams" to use? (#1757) (Tuesday, 28 June)
• Re: [webauthn] How to declare that a registration only awaits for a Security Key? (#1750) (Tuesday, 28 June)
• Re: [webauthn] Use aPAKE/OPAQUE for FIDO multi-device credentials (PassKey) (#1747) (Tuesday, 28 June)
• Closed: [webauthn] How to know if a user has already registered a device? (#1749) (Monday, 27 June)
• Re: [webauthn] How to know if a user has already registered a device? (#1749) (Monday, 27 June)
• Re: [webauthn] Clarify how a user can authenticate from multiple devices (#151) (Monday, 27 June)
• Re: [webauthn] How to know if a user has already registered a device? (#1749) (Sunday, 26 June)
• Re: [webauthn] How to know if a user has already registered a device? (#1749) (Tuesday, 21 June)
• Re: [webauthn] Discussing mechanisms for enterprise RP's to enforce bound properties of credentials (#1739) (Monday, 20 June)
• Re: [webauthn] Discussing mechanisms for enterprise RP's to enforce bound properties of credentials (#1739) (Monday, 20 June)
• Re: [webauthn] How to know if a user has already registered a device? (#1749) (Monday, 20 June)
• Re: [webauthn] Inconsistencies in backup state flags (#1740) (Monday, 13 June)
• Re: [webauthn] Attestation on Get Assertion (#1741) (Thursday, 9 June)
• [webauthn] Attestation on Get Assertion (#1741) (Thursday, 9 June)

W3C Calendar

• Event Updated: WebAuthn WG (Wednesday, 8 June)
• Event Invitation: WebAuthn WG (Wednesday, 8 June)

W3C Webmaster via GitHub API

• Weekly github digest (WebAuthn) (Tuesday, 28 June)
• Weekly github digest (WebAuthn) (Tuesday, 21 June)
• Weekly github digest (WebAuthn) (Tuesday, 14 June)
• Weekly github digest (WebAuthn) (Tuesday, 7 June)

Wendy Seltzer

• Re: [w3c/webauthn] (Thursday, 23 June)

Wendy Seltzer via GitHub

• Re: [webauthn] non-modal "conditionally mediated" UI (#1576) (Wednesday, 29 June)

Last message date: Thursday, 30 June 2022 12:21:44 UTC