- From: Firstyear via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2022 00:51:48 +0000
- To: public-webauthn@w3.org
> However, maybe it might make sense to split this into two RFCs. This complex one for all the fluff, and another one for the straightforward authentication case. Like for example a separate "simplewebauthn" two-pager spec without options and proper JSON responses. Ideally it would also reuse other RFCs like JWT for signed content, to obtain something that everybody could use out of the box, easily and safely. But well, I guess this is just wishful thinking. > > If you want to foster adoption, making a simple spec for devs would be a great way. Yes, I think this is a good idea. @MasterKale and I have spoken about this before. But I think the challenge is that even in the simple spec, webauthn today can't actually meet some RP use cases properly .... Anyway, where would be the right place to bootstrap such an effort. I'd be more than happy to start. -- GitHub Notification of comment by Firstyear Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/webauthn/issues/1751#issuecomment-1162504296 using your GitHub account -- Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Wednesday, 22 June 2022 00:51:50 UTC