=JeffH
Adam Rice
- Re: [whatwg/streams] How much latitude should implementations have in looking up transformer.transform()? (#691) (Thursday, 30 November)
- Re: [whatwg/streams] Lookup methods in constructors (#860) (Thursday, 30 November)
- [whatwg/streams] Lookup methods in constructors (#860) (Thursday, 30 November)
- Re: [whatwg/streams] How much latitude should implementations have in looking up transformer.transform()? (#691) (Thursday, 30 November)
- Re: [whatwg/streams] WIP: allow creating streams from specs while using fewer JS objects (#857) (Wednesday, 29 November)
- Re: [whatwg/streams] WIP: allow creating streams from specs while using fewer JS objects (#857) (Wednesday, 29 November)
- Re: [whatwg/streams] WIP: allow creating streams from specs while using fewer JS objects (#857) (Wednesday, 29 November)
- Re: [whatwg/streams] WIP: allow creating streams from specs while using fewer JS objects (#857) (Wednesday, 29 November)
- Re: [whatwg/streams] WIP: allow creating streams from specs while using fewer JS objects (#857) (Wednesday, 29 November)
- Re: [whatwg/streams] WIP: allow creating streams from specs while using fewer JS objects (#857) (Tuesday, 28 November)
- Re: [whatwg/streams] WIP: allow creating streams from specs while using fewer JS objects (#857) (Tuesday, 28 November)
- Re: [whatwg/streams] WIP: allow creating streams from specs while using fewer JS objects (#857) (Tuesday, 28 November)
- Re: [whatwg/streams] [Question] questions about streaming-element-backpressure.js (#855) (Tuesday, 28 November)
- Re: [whatwg/streams] WIP: allow creating streams from specs while using fewer JS objects (#857) (Monday, 27 November)
- Re: [whatwg/streams] WIP: allow creating streams from specs while using fewer JS objects (#857) (Monday, 27 November)
- Re: [whatwg/streams] WIP: allow creating streams from specs while using fewer JS objects (#857) (Monday, 27 November)
- Re: [whatwg/streams] WIP: allow creating streams from specs while using fewer JS objects (#857) (Wednesday, 22 November)
- Re: [whatwg/streams] WIP: allow creating streams from specs while using fewer JS objects (#857) (Tuesday, 21 November)
- Re: [whatwg/streams] WIP: allow creating streams from specs while using fewer JS objects (#857) (Tuesday, 21 November)
- Re: [whatwg/streams] WIP: allow creating streams from specs while using fewer JS objects (#857) (Tuesday, 21 November)
- Re: [whatwg/streams] WIP: allow creating streams from specs while using fewer JS objects (#857) (Monday, 20 November)
- Re: [whatwg/streams] WIP: allow creating streams from specs while using fewer JS objects (#857) (Monday, 20 November)
- Re: [whatwg/streams] WIP: allow creating streams from specs while using fewer JS objects (#857) (Monday, 20 November)
- Re: [whatwg/streams] WIP: allow creating streams from specs while using fewer JS objects (#857) (Monday, 20 November)
- Re: [whatwg/streams] WIP: allow creating streams from specs while using fewer JS objects (#857) (Monday, 20 November)
- Re: [whatwg/streams] WIP: allow creating streams from specs while using fewer JS objects (#857) (Monday, 20 November)
- Re: [whatwg/streams] WIP: allow creating streams from specs while using fewer JS objects (#857) (Monday, 20 November)
- Re: [whatwg/streams] WIP: allow creating streams from specs while using fewer JS objects (#857) (Friday, 17 November)
- Re: [whatwg/streams] WIP: allow creating streams from specs while using fewer JS objects (#857) (Friday, 17 November)
- Re: [whatwg/streams] WIP: allow creating streams from specs while using fewer JS objects (#857) (Friday, 17 November)
- Re: [whatwg/streams] WIP: allow creating streams from specs while using fewer JS objects (#857) (Friday, 17 November)
- Re: [whatwg/streams] WIP: allow creating streams from specs while using fewer JS objects (#857) (Friday, 17 November)
- [whatwg/streams] Branch snapshot missing for algorithm-slots branch (#858) (Friday, 17 November)
- Re: [whatwg/streams] Prohibit setting a strategy size for byte streams (#856) (Friday, 17 November)
- Re: [whatwg/streams] new ReadableStream({type: 'bytes'}, new CountQueuingStrategy({highWaterMark: 5})) is weird (#729) (Friday, 17 November)
- Re: [whatwg/streams] Prohibit setting a strategy size for byte streams (#856) (Friday, 17 November)
- Re: [whatwg/streams] Prohibit setting a strategy size for byte streams (#856) (Friday, 17 November)
- Re: [whatwg/streams] Prohibit setting a strategy size for byte streams (#856) (Thursday, 16 November)
- [whatwg/streams] Prohibit setting a strategy size for byte streams (#856) (Thursday, 16 November)
- Re: [whatwg/streams] [Question] questions about streaming-element-backpressure.js (#855) (Tuesday, 14 November)
- Re: [whatwg/streams] reader.read() inside strategy.size() doesn't work (#794) (Monday, 13 November)
- Re: [whatwg/streams] reader.read() inside strategy.size() doesn't work (#794) (Monday, 13 November)
- Re: [whatwg/streams] Remove transform streams tests as they are now upstream (#854) (Monday, 13 November)
- Re: [whatwg/streams] Move transform stream tests to web platform tests (#851) (Monday, 13 November)
- Re: [whatwg/streams] Remove transform streams tests as they are now upstream (#854) (Monday, 13 November)
- Re: [whatwg/streams] Tests contain non-zero timers (#548) (Friday, 10 November)
- Re: [whatwg/streams] Remove transform streams tests as they are now upstream (#854) (Thursday, 9 November)
- Re: [whatwg/streams] Remove transform streams tests as they are now upstream (#854) (Tuesday, 7 November)
- [whatwg/streams] Remove transform streams tests as they are now upstream (#854) (Tuesday, 7 November)
- Re: [whatwg/streams] Make it easy to create streams with no underlying source/sink/transformer objects, from specs (#813) (Tuesday, 7 November)
- Re: [whatwg/streams] How much latitude should implementations have in looking up transformer.transform()? (#691) (Tuesday, 7 November)
- [whatwg/fetch] Nitpick: The user agent can terminate the fetch ... "res => res.body.getReader().closed" (#625) (Monday, 6 November)
- Re: [whatwg/streams] Test that TransformStream does not use global constructors (#852) (Monday, 6 November)
- Re: [whatwg/streams] Added a couple of examples (#853) (Monday, 6 November)
- Re: [whatwg/streams] Added a couple of examples (#853) (Monday, 6 November)
- Re: [whatwg/streams] Constructing ReadableStream and WritableStream in TransformStream constructor (#850) (Thursday, 2 November)
- [w3ctag/design-reviews] Transform Streams (#211) (Thursday, 2 November)
- Re: [whatwg/streams] Standard text for TransformStream (#811) (Thursday, 2 November)
- Re: [whatwg/streams] Test that TransformStream does not use global constructors (#852) (Thursday, 2 November)
- Re: [whatwg/streams] Test that TransformStream does not use global constructors (#852) (Thursday, 2 November)
- Re: [whatwg/streams] Test that TransformStream does not use global constructors (#852) (Thursday, 2 November)
- [whatwg/streams] Test that TransformStream does not use global constructors (#852) (Thursday, 2 November)
- Re: [whatwg/streams] Meta: use the common deploy.sh (with POST_BUILD_STEP) (#849) (Thursday, 2 November)
- Re: [whatwg/streams] Add SyncOneToOneTransformFunctionAdaptor example (#843) (Thursday, 2 November)
- Re: [whatwg/streams] Add an example of a transform stream that replaces template tags (#846) (Thursday, 2 November)
- Re: [whatwg/streams] Standard text for TransformStream (#811) (Thursday, 2 November)
- Re: [whatwg/streams] Standard text for TransformStream (#811) (Thursday, 2 November)
- Re: [whatwg/streams] Constructing ReadableStream and WritableStream in TransformStream constructor (#850) (Thursday, 2 November)
- Re: [whatwg/streams] Standard text for TransformStream (#811) (Wednesday, 1 November)
- Re: [whatwg/streams] Standard text for TransformStream (#811) (Wednesday, 1 November)
- [whatwg/streams] Constructing ReadableStream and WritableStream in TransformStream constructor (#850) (Wednesday, 1 November)
adambet3
Addison Phillips
Alec Miller
Alessandro
Alex Russell
Alexander Shalamov
- Re: [w3c/screen-orientation] Clean-up anchors and definitions (#109) (Thursday, 2 November)
- Re: [w3c/screen-orientation] Clean-up anchors and definitions (#109) (Thursday, 2 November)
- Re: [w3c/screen-orientation] Clean-up anchors and definitions (#109) (Thursday, 2 November)
- [w3c/screen-orientation] Clean-up anchors and definitions (#109) (Thursday, 2 November)
- Re: [w3c/screen-orientation] Fix all ReSpec warnings (#108) (Wednesday, 1 November)
- Re: [w3c/screen-orientation] Fix all ReSpec warnings (#108) (Wednesday, 1 November)
- Re: [w3c/screen-orientation] Fix all ReSpec warnings (#108) (Wednesday, 1 November)
- Re: [w3c/screen-orientation] Fix all ReSpec warnings (#108) (Wednesday, 1 November)
- Re: [w3c/screen-orientation] Fix all ReSpec warnings (#108) (Wednesday, 1 November)
- Re: [w3c/screen-orientation] Fix all ReSpec warnings (#108) (Wednesday, 1 November)
- [w3c/screen-orientation] Fix all ReSpec warnings (#108) (Wednesday, 1 November)
Alfred Morgan
Allen Kim
Amirhosein835
Anders Rundgren
Andrea Giammarchi
Andreas Tolfsen
Andrew Betts
Anne van Kesteren
- Re: [whatwg/url] Editorial: export "urlencoded parser" for Fetch (#356) (Thursday, 30 November)
- [whatwg/url] Editorial: export "urlencoded parser" for Fetch (#356) (Thursday, 30 November)
- Re: [whatwg/fetch] Editorial: address Bikeshed and minor wording issues (#640) (Thursday, 30 November)
- [whatwg/fetch] Editorial: address Bikeshed and minor wording issues (#640) (Thursday, 30 November)
- Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] CSS Selectors 4 (#219) (Thursday, 30 November)
- Re: [whatwg/fetch] linking errors upon building fetch? (#639) (Thursday, 30 November)
- Re: [w3c/FileAPI] Add BlobPropertyBag.endings back to the spec. (#90) (Thursday, 30 November)
- Re: [w3c/FileAPI] Implementations allow all values in type getter (#43) (Wednesday, 29 November)
- Re: [w3c/FileAPI] Add BlobPropertyBag.endings back to the spec. (#90) (Wednesday, 29 November)
- Re: [w3c/FileAPI] Add BlobPropertyBag.endings back to the spec. (#90) (Wednesday, 29 November)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] WebPlatform Web Components F2F 2018 (#713) (Wednesday, 29 November)
- Re: [w3c/FileAPI] Implementations allow all values in type getter (#43) (Wednesday, 29 November)
- Re: [w3c/FileAPI] Implementations allow all values in type getter (#43) (Tuesday, 28 November)
- Re: [w3c/FileAPI] Clarify Lifetime of BlobStore (#89) (Tuesday, 28 November)
- Re: [w3c/FileAPI] Clarify Lifetime of BlobStore (#89) (Tuesday, 28 November)
- Re: [whatwg/url] Consider adding a constructor to make a URL from parts (#354) (Tuesday, 28 November)
- Re: [w3c/FileAPI] Clarify Lifetime of BlobStore (#89) (Tuesday, 28 November)
- Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Please default fetch() init credentials to 'same-origin' (#1234) (Tuesday, 28 November)
- Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Please default fetch() init credentials to 'same-origin' (#1234) (Tuesday, 28 November)
- Re: [whatwg/xhr] Look at overrideMimeType() again (#157) (Monday, 27 November)
- Re: [whatwg/url] Remove Googlefight links (#352) (Monday, 27 November)
- Re: [whatwg/url] Remove Googlefight links (#352) (Monday, 27 November)
- Re: [whatwg/url] Consider adding a constructor to make a URL from parts (#354) (Monday, 27 November)
- Re: [whatwg/url] Consider adding a constructor to make a URL from parts (#354) (Monday, 27 November)
- Re: [whatwg/url] Remove Googlefight links (#352) (Monday, 27 November)
- Re: [whatwg/url] Remove Googlefight links (#352) (Monday, 27 November)
- Re: [whatwg/url] Remove Googlefight links (#352) (Monday, 27 November)
- Re: [whatwg/url] Remove Googlefight links (#352) (Monday, 27 November)
- Re: [whatwg/encoding] Need more changes for common deploy (#126) (Monday, 27 November)
- Re: [whatwg/fetch] Clarify semantics of checking done, closed, etc. states of a null body stream (#635) (Monday, 27 November)
- Re: [whatwg/fetch] More eargerly send RST_STREAM on redirects (#638) (Monday, 27 November)
- Re: [whatwg/url] Remove Googlefight links (#352) (Sunday, 26 November)
- Re: [whatwg/streams] Branch snapshot missing for algorithm-slots branch (#858) (Sunday, 26 November)
- Re: [whatwg/fetch] Safelist Content-Length header (#626) (Saturday, 25 November)
- Re: [w3c/FileAPI] Document BlobPropertyBag "endings", or keep pushing to remove? (#46) (Saturday, 25 November)
- [whatwg/encoding] Need more changes for common deploy (#126) (Saturday, 25 November)
- [whatwg/url] Need more changes for common deploy (#353) (Saturday, 25 November)
- Re: [w3c/FileAPI] Implementations allow all values in type getter (#43) (Saturday, 25 November)
- Re: [w3c/FileAPI] Implementations allow all values in type getter (#43) (Friday, 24 November)
- Re: [whatwg/fetch] Clarify semantics of checking done, closed, etc. states of a null body stream (#635) (Friday, 24 November)
- [whatwg/fetch] More eargerly send RST_STREAM on redirects (#638) (Friday, 24 November)
- Re: [whatwg/fetch] Should request's origin be exposed to javascript (#272) (Friday, 24 November)
- Re: [whatwg/fetch] Should request's origin be exposed to javascript (#272) (Friday, 24 November)
- Re: [whatwg/fetch] what should fetch() do if request's window has been destroyed or stopped? (#153) (Friday, 24 November)
- Re: [whatwg/fetch] Cloned responses should not have immutable headers (#608) (Friday, 24 November)
- Re: [whatwg/fetch] History behind the decision to make fetch return a Promise (#611) (Friday, 24 November)
- Re: [whatwg/fetch] Acknowledge Yehuda Katz (#615) (Friday, 24 November)
- Re: [whatwg/fetch] How to set a Basic Authentication headers ? (#623) (Friday, 24 November)
- Re: [whatwg/fetch] Clarify semantics of checking done, closed, etc. states of a null body stream (#635) (Friday, 24 November)
- [whatwg/fetch] Define RST_STREAM's error code (#637) (Friday, 24 November)
- Re: [whatwg/fetch] Clarify semantics of checking done, closed, etc. states of a null body stream (#635) (Friday, 24 November)
- Re: [w3c/clipboard-apis] Support for reading custom MIME types from the clipboard (#46) (Thursday, 23 November)
- Re: [w3c/FileAPI] Implementations allow all values in type getter (#43) (Thursday, 23 November)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] WebPlatform Web Components F2F 2018 (#713) (Thursday, 23 November)
- Re: [whatwg/fetch] Use request's current url as base URL in redirects (#633) (Thursday, 23 November)
- Re: [heycam/webidl] Some means to signal that a method requires user action to be called (#479) (Thursday, 23 November)
- Re: [heycam/webidl] Some means to signal that a method requires user action to be called (#479) (Thursday, 23 November)
- Re: [whatwg/fetch] "3.3.1. ..." Allow on empty content-type (#636) (Thursday, 23 November)
- Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] what happens if an initial about:blank inherits a controller, but its navigation request does not match any service worker? (#1232) (Thursday, 23 November)
- Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] what happens if an initial about:blank inherits a controller, but its navigation request does not match any service worker? (#1232) (Thursday, 23 November)
- Re: [whatwg/fetch] "3.3.1. ..." Allow on empty content-type (#636) (Thursday, 23 November)
- Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] what happens if an initial about:blank inherits a controller, but its navigation request does not match any service worker? (#1232) (Thursday, 23 November)
- Re: [heycam/webidl] Some means to signal that a method requires user action to be called (#479) (Thursday, 23 November)
- Re: [whatwg/fetch] "3.3.1. ..." Allow on empty content-type (#636) (Thursday, 23 November)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] WebPlatform Web Components F2F 2018 (#713) (Wednesday, 22 November)
- Re: [whatwg/fetch] "3.3.1. ..." Allow on empty content-type (#636) (Wednesday, 22 November)
- Re: [whatwg/fetch] "3.3.1. ..." Allow on empty content-type (#636) (Wednesday, 22 November)
- Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] what happens if an initial about:blank inherits a controller, but its navigation request does not match any service worker? (#1232) (Wednesday, 22 November)
- Re: [whatwg/fetch] "3.3.1. ..." Allow on empty content-type (#636) (Wednesday, 22 November)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] Simply MutationObserver callback handling with optional reference property in MutationObserverInit object (#539) (Wednesday, 22 November)
- Re: [whatwg/encoding] Meta: TF-8 decode without BOM or fail is used at least once (#124) (Tuesday, 21 November)
- [whatwg/dom] Editorial: use JavaScript string length (#538) (Tuesday, 21 November)
- [whatwg/dom] Stop using unit of related similar-origin browsing contexts (#537) (Tuesday, 21 November)
- Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Introduce a parallel queue for running Jobs (#1229) (Tuesday, 21 November)
- Re: [whatwg/fetch] Clarify semantics of checking done, closed, etc. states of a null body stream (#635) (Tuesday, 21 November)
- Re: [whatwg/fetch] Use request's current url as base URL in redirects (#633) (Tuesday, 21 November)
- Re: [whatwg/fetch] Clarify semantics of checking done, closed, etc. states of a null body stream (#635) (Tuesday, 21 November)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] Compute everything needed for composedPath() during dispatch (#535) (Tuesday, 21 November)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] event.composedPath() may return different results if DOM is modified between two calls (#525) (Tuesday, 21 November)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] Compute everything needed for composedPath() during dispatch (#535) (Tuesday, 21 November)
- Re: [whatwg/fetch] Clarify semantics of checking done, closed, etc. states of a null body stream (#635) (Tuesday, 21 November)
- Re: [whatwg/fetch] Document CORS safelist exceptions (#621) (Tuesday, 21 November)
- Re: [whatwg/fetch] What to do about requests that should (maybe) preflight but don't? (#567) (Tuesday, 21 November)
- Re: [whatwg/fetch] Document CORS safelist exceptions (#621) (Tuesday, 21 November)
- Re: [whatwg/fetch] Clarify semantics of checking done, closed, etc. states of a null body stream (#635) (Tuesday, 21 November)
- Re: [whatwg/fetch] Generic Accept header value */* and Service Workers (#634) (Monday, 20 November)
- Re: [whatwg/fetch] Use request's current url as base URL in redirects (#633) (Monday, 20 November)
- Re: [whatwg/fetch] Generic Accept header value */* and Service Workers (#634) (Monday, 20 November)
- Re: [whatwg/storage] Bucket hooks (#18) (Monday, 20 November)
- Re: [whatwg/storage] Box hooks (#18) (Monday, 20 November)
- Re: [whatwg/fetch] Clarify response's url list state when parsing a 3xx response's Location header value (#631) (Monday, 20 November)
- [whatwg/fetch] Use request's current url as base URL in redirects (#633) (Monday, 20 November)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] Compute everything needed for composedPath() during dispatch (#535) (Monday, 20 November)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] Compute everything needed for composedPath() during dispatch (#535) (Monday, 20 November)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] No way to resolve a Promise with a cross domain WindowProxy (#536) (Monday, 20 November)
- Re: [whatwg/fetch] Document CORS safelist exceptions (#621) (Monday, 20 November)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] [idea] Make use of `observedAttributes` optional (#565) (Monday, 20 November)
- Re: [whatwg/streams] Branch snapshot missing for algorithm-slots branch (#858) (Friday, 17 November)
- Re: [whatwg/fetch] WebSocket connections don't appear to send referrers (#630) (Friday, 17 November)
- Re: [whatwg/fetch] WebSocket handshake has no referrer (#632) (Friday, 17 November)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] No way to resolve a Promise with a cross domain WindowProxy (#536) (Friday, 17 November)
- Re: [whatwg/fullscreen] Define fullscreen in terms of feature policy (#106) (Thursday, 16 November)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] No way to resolve a Promise with a cross domain WindowProxy (#536) (Thursday, 16 November)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] No way to resolve a Promise with a cross domain WindowProxy (#536) (Thursday, 16 November)
- Re: [whatwg/fetch] WebSocket handshake has no referrer (#632) (Thursday, 16 November)
- Re: [heycam/webidl] Make [Exposed] mandatory, remove [PrimaryGlobal] (#423) (Thursday, 16 November)
- Re: [whatwg/fullscreen] Define fullscreen in terms of feature policy (#106) (Thursday, 16 November)
- Re: [w3c/filesystem-api] Is this spec deprecated? (#8) (Thursday, 16 November)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] No way to resolve a Promise with a cross domain WindowProxy (#536) (Thursday, 16 November)
- Re: [heycam/webidl] Make [Exposed] mandatory, remove [PrimaryGlobal] (#423) (Wednesday, 15 November)
- Re: [whatwg/fetch] Clarify response's url list state when parsing a 3xx response's Location header value (#631) (Wednesday, 15 November)
- Re: [whatwg/fetch] WebSocket handshake has no referrer (#632) (Wednesday, 15 November)
- Re: [heycam/webidl] Proposed solution to make grammar changes less disruptive (#477) (Wednesday, 15 November)
- Re: [whatwg/fetch] WebSocket handshake has no referrer (#632) (Wednesday, 15 November)
- [whatwg/fetch] WebSocket handshake has no referrer (#632) (Wednesday, 15 November)
- Re: [whatwg/fetch] Clarify response's url list state when parsing a 3xx response's Location header value (#631) (Wednesday, 15 November)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] Proposal: ParentNode.empty() (#478) (Wednesday, 15 November)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] No way to resolve a Promise with a cross domain WindowProxy (#536) (Wednesday, 15 November)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Add `customElements.upgrade` (#710) (Tuesday, 14 November)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Agenda for W3C TPAC 2017 (Web Components) (#641) (Tuesday, 14 November)
- Re: [heycam/webidl] Proposed solution to make grammar changes less disruptive (#477) (Tuesday, 14 November)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Selection APIs for Shadow DOM (#79) (Monday, 13 November)
- Re: [w3c/DOM-Parsing] should createContextualFragment be added in Document / DocumentFragment? (#33) (Monday, 13 November)
- Re: [w3c/DOM-Parsing] should createContextualFragment be added in Document / DocumentFragment? (#33) (Monday, 13 November)
- Re: [whatwg/fetch] Document CORS safelist exceptions (#621) (Monday, 13 November)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] [templates] Allow removal of boolean attributes (#705) (Monday, 13 November)
- Re: [whatwg/storage] Consider renaming boxes to bins or something (#51) (Saturday, 11 November)
- Re: [whatwg/storage] Rename boxes to bins (#52) (Saturday, 11 November)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] Compute everything needed for composedPath() during dispatch (#535) (Friday, 10 November)
- Re: [whatwg/storage] Rename boxes to bins (#52) (Friday, 10 November)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] Proposal: DOMChangeList (#270) (Friday, 10 November)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Having slots as element prevents styling empty containers (#701) (Friday, 10 November)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Having slots as element prevents styling empty containers (#701) (Friday, 10 November)
- Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Proposal: FetchEvent.navigationLoadType (#1167) (Friday, 10 November)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] [idea] Not having <slot> element get in the way of structure. (#589) (Friday, 10 November)
- Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Files and Directory Entries API with webkit prefixes! (#215) (Friday, 10 November)
- Re: [whatwg/fetch] consider failing same-origin fetch requests that get a cross-origin cors Response synthesized by a service worker (#629) (Friday, 10 November)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] event.composedPath() may return different results if DOM is modified between two calls (#525) (Thursday, 9 November)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] event.composedPath() may return different results if DOM is modified between two calls (#525) (Thursday, 9 November)
- Re: [whatwg/fetch] consider failing same-origin fetch requests that get a cross-origin cors Response synthesized by a service worker (#629) (Thursday, 9 November)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] event.composedPath() may return different results if DOM is modified between two calls (#525) (Thursday, 9 November)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] Compute everything needed for composedPath() during dispatch (#535) (Thursday, 9 November)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] Compute everything needed for composedPath() during dispatch (#535) (Thursday, 9 November)
- [whatwg/dom] Compute everything needed for composedPath() during dispatch (#535) (Thursday, 9 November)
- Re: [whatwg/fetch] Why does Fetch specify a max redirect count of 20? (#576) (Thursday, 9 November)
- Re: [whatwg/fetch] Request body streams that cannot be retried (#538) (Thursday, 9 November)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Reserve hyphenated or `$`-including properties for customization (#700) (Thursday, 9 November)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] Test multiple text nodes (#528) (Wednesday, 8 November)
- Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Proposal: FetchEvent.navigationLoadType (#1167) (Wednesday, 8 November)
- Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] _Update algorithm should unregister SW on 404 and 410 errors (#204) (Wednesday, 8 November)
- Re: [whatwg/fetch] Authorisation header not sent for POST requests (#628) (Wednesday, 8 November)
- Re: [whatwg/fetch] Update Fetch to support Token Binding. (#325) (Wednesday, 8 November)
- Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] _Update algorithm should unregister SW on 404 and 410 errors (#204) (Wednesday, 8 November)
- Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] What happens to the request body if the fetch isn't handled? (#1191) (Wednesday, 8 November)
- Re: [whatwg/fetch] consider failing same-origin fetch requests that get a cross-origin cors Response synthesized by a service worker (#629) (Wednesday, 8 November)
- Re: [whatwg/fetch] consider failing same-origin fetch requests that get a cross-origin cors Response synthesized by a service worker (#629) (Wednesday, 8 November)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] Touch/Trackpad finger position (#534) (Wednesday, 8 November)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] Touch/Trackpad finger position (#534) (Wednesday, 8 November)
- Re: [whatwg/fetch] Should Content-Type header be stripped when redirecting from POST to GET? (#609) (Wednesday, 8 November)
- Re: [whatwg/fetch] Authorisation header not sent for POST requests (#628) (Tuesday, 7 November)
- Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Editorial: change salutation (#209) (Tuesday, 7 November)
- Re: [whatwg/fetch] Authorisation header not sent for POST requests (#628) (Tuesday, 7 November)
- Re: [whatwg/fetch] Reject Promise on Error Response (#627) (Tuesday, 7 November)
- Re: [whatwg/fetch] Should Content-Type header be stripped when redirecting from POST to GET? (#609) (Tuesday, 7 November)
- Re: [whatwg/fetch] Reject Promise on Error Response (#627) (Tuesday, 7 November)
- Re: [whatwg/fetch] Reject Promise on Error Response (#627) (Tuesday, 7 November)
- Re: [whatwg/fetch] Safelist Content-Length header (#626) (Tuesday, 7 November)
- Re: [whatwg/fetch] Safelist Content-Length header (#626) (Tuesday, 7 November)
- Re: [whatwg/fetch] Safelist Content-Length header (#626) (Tuesday, 7 November)
- Re: [whatwg/fetch] Safelist Content-Length header (#626) (Tuesday, 7 November)
- Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Editorial: change salutation (#209) (Tuesday, 7 November)
- Re: [whatwg/fetch] Request body streams that cannot be retried (#538) (Tuesday, 7 November)
- Re: [whatwg/fetch] Document CORS safelist exceptions (#621) (Tuesday, 7 November)
- Re: [whatwg/fetch] Expose Content-Length header in CORS requests (#622) (Monday, 6 November)
- Re: [whatwg/fetch] Expose Content-Length header in CORS requests (#622) (Monday, 6 November)
- Re: [whatwg/fetch] Expose Content-Length header in CORS requests (#622) (Monday, 6 November)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] event.composedPath() may return different results if DOM is modified between two calls (#525) (Monday, 6 November)
- Re: [whatwg/fetch] Document CORS safelist exceptions (#621) (Monday, 6 November)
- Re: [whatwg/fetch] Nitpick: The user agent can terminate the fetch ... "res => res.body.getReader().closed" (#625) (Monday, 6 November)
- Re: [whatwg/fetch] Document CORS safelist exceptions (#621) (Monday, 6 November)
- Re: [whatwg/fetch] Document CORS safelist exceptions (#621) (Monday, 6 November)
- Re: [whatwg/fetch] Adds "audioworklet" and "paintworklet" as destinations. (#527) (Monday, 6 November)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] Use mixins in IDL definitions (#529) (Saturday, 4 November)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] Use mixins in IDL definitions (#529) (Saturday, 4 November)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] Add window.event, event.srcElement, event.returnValue as a legacy compat requirements (#407) (Friday, 3 November)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] label-input association across Shadow DOM boundary (#530) (Friday, 3 November)
- Re: [whatwg/fetch] Expose Content-Length header in CORS requests (#622) (Friday, 3 November)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] Use mixins in IDL definitions (#529) (Friday, 3 November)
- Re: [whatwg/xhr] I think I have a bug (#170) (Friday, 3 November)
- Re: [whatwg/xhr] I think I have a bug (#170) (Friday, 3 November)
- Re: [heycam/webidl] Add [InsecureContext] (#471) (Friday, 3 November)
- [whatwg/dom] Test multiple text nodes (#528) (Thursday, 2 November)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] [templates] Consider ${foo} instead of {{foo}} (#688) (Thursday, 2 November)
- Re: [whatwg/xhr] Im in need of some guidance please (#168) (Thursday, 2 November)
- Re: [whatwg/xhr] Im in need of some guidance please (#168) (Thursday, 2 November)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] [templates] Maybe each {{ ~ }} should be its own text node? (#683) (Thursday, 2 November)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] [templates] Maybe each {{ ~ }} should be its own text node? (#683) (Thursday, 2 November)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] [templates] Maybe each {{ ~ }} should be its own text node? (#683) (Thursday, 2 November)
- Re: [whatwg/fetch] How to set a Basic Authentication headers ? (#623) (Thursday, 2 November)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] [templates] Maybe each {{ ~ }} should be its own text node? (#683) (Thursday, 2 November)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] [templates] Maybe each {{ ~ }} should be its own text node? (#683) (Thursday, 2 November)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] "node's tree" seems to be an undefined concept (#526) (Thursday, 2 November)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] Why don't we have CSS VR? (#527) (Thursday, 2 November)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] Why don't we have CSS VR? (#527) (Thursday, 2 November)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] Why don't we have CSS VR? (#527) (Thursday, 2 November)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] Declarative Shadow DOM (#510) (Wednesday, 1 November)
- Re: [whatwg/fetch] Use the URL from the response, if it has one (#146) (Wednesday, 1 November)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] "node's tree" seems to be an undefined concept (#526) (Wednesday, 1 November)
- Re: [whatwg/xhr] developer (#167) (Wednesday, 1 November)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] Declarative Shadow DOM (#510) (Wednesday, 1 November)
- Re: [whatwg/fetch] Adds "audioworklet" and "paintworklet" as destinations. (#527) (Wednesday, 1 November)
- Re: [whatwg/fetch] Adds "audioworklet" and "paintworklet" as destinations. (#527) (Wednesday, 1 November)
- Re: [whatwg/fetch] Adds "audioworklet" and "paintworklet" as destinations. (#527) (Wednesday, 1 November)
- Re: [whatwg/url] Should URLSearchParams stringify be called in URL constructor? (#350) (Wednesday, 1 November)
anonymous
Arnaud Becher
Arthur Stolyar
Ashley (Scirra)
beidson
Ben Kelly
- Re: [whatwg/fetch] consider failing same-origin fetch requests that get a cross-origin cors Response synthesized by a service worker (#629) (Thursday, 30 November)
- Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] How do I get extendableEvent.waitUntil() to play nicely with async functions (#1237) (Wednesday, 29 November)
- Re: [whatwg/fetch] consider failing same-origin fetch requests that get a cross-origin cors Response synthesized by a service worker (#629) (Wednesday, 29 November)
- Re: [whatwg/fetch] consider failing same-origin fetch requests that get a cross-origin cors Response synthesized by a service worker (#629) (Wednesday, 29 November)
- Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] what happens if an initial about:blank inherits a controller, but its navigation request does not match any service worker? (#1232) (Thursday, 23 November)
- Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] what happens if an initial about:blank inherits a controller, but its navigation request does not match any service worker? (#1232) (Wednesday, 22 November)
- Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] what happens if an initial about:blank inherits a controller, but its navigation request does not match any service worker? (#1232) (Wednesday, 22 November)
- Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] what happens if an initial about:blank inherits a controller, but its navigation request does not match any service worker? (#1232) (Wednesday, 22 November)
- [w3c/ServiceWorker] what happens if an initial about:blank inherits a controller, but its navigation request does not match any service worker? (#1232) (Wednesday, 22 November)
- [w3c/ServiceWorker] consider exposing credentials.get() but only when mediation is set to "silent" (#1231) (Wednesday, 22 November)
- Re: [whatwg/fetch] Use request's current url as base URL in redirects (#633) (Tuesday, 21 November)
- Re: [whatwg/fetch] Use request's current url as base URL in redirects (#633) (Tuesday, 21 November)
- Re: [whatwg/fetch] Generic Accept header value */* and Service Workers (#634) (Tuesday, 21 November)
- Re: [whatwg/fetch] Generic Accept header value */* and Service Workers (#634) (Monday, 20 November)
- Re: [whatwg/fetch] Use request's current url as base URL in redirects (#633) (Monday, 20 November)
- Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] when will navigation `FetchEvent.resultingClientId` have a reserved client and not an initial about:blank client? (#1228) (Friday, 17 November)
- Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] when will navigation `FetchEvent.resultingClientId` have a reserved client and not an initial about:blank client? (#1228) (Friday, 17 November)
- Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] when will navigation `FetchEvent.resultingClientId` have a reserved client and not an initial about:blank client? (#1228) (Friday, 17 November)
- Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] when will navigation `FetchEvent.resultingClientId` have a reserved client and not an initial about:blank client? (#1228) (Friday, 17 November)
- [w3c/ServiceWorker] when will navigation `FetchEvent.resultingClientId` have a reserved client and not an initial about:blank client? (#1228) (Friday, 17 November)
- Re: [whatwg/fetch] Clarify response's url list state when parsing a 3xx response's Location header value (#631) (Wednesday, 15 November)
- Re: [whatwg/fetch] Clarify response's url list state when parsing a 3xx response's Location header value (#631) (Wednesday, 15 November)
- Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Why is the scope to registration map and ordered map? (#1225) (Tuesday, 14 November)
- Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Run Job does not specify which event loop to queue its tasks on (#1224) (Tuesday, 14 November)
- Re: [whatwg/fetch] consider failing same-origin fetch requests that get a cross-origin cors Response synthesized by a service worker (#629) (Monday, 13 November)
- Re: [whatwg/fetch] consider failing same-origin fetch requests that get a cross-origin cors Response synthesized by a service worker (#629) (Saturday, 11 November)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] [templates] How to handle expressions in tables (#703) (Friday, 10 November)
- Re: [whatwg/fetch] consider failing same-origin fetch requests that get a cross-origin cors Response synthesized by a service worker (#629) (Friday, 10 November)
- Re: [whatwg/fetch] consider failing same-origin fetch requests that get a cross-origin cors Response synthesized by a service worker (#629) (Thursday, 9 November)
- Re: [whatwg/fetch] Why does Fetch specify a max redirect count of 20? (#576) (Wednesday, 8 November)
- Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Should we specify behavior for using objects from detached contexts? (#1221) (Wednesday, 8 November)
- Re: [whatwg/fetch] consider failing same-origin fetch requests that get a cross-origin cors Response synthesized by a service worker (#629) (Wednesday, 8 November)
- Re: [whatwg/fetch] consider failing same-origin fetch requests that get a cross-origin cors Response synthesized by a service worker (#629) (Wednesday, 8 November)
- Re: [whatwg/fetch] consider failing same-origin fetch requests that get a cross-origin cors Response synthesized by a service worker (#629) (Wednesday, 8 November)
- Re: [whatwg/fetch] consider failing same-origin fetch requests that get a cross-origin cors Response synthesized by a service worker (#629) (Wednesday, 8 November)
- [whatwg/fetch] consider failing same-origin fetch requests that get a cross-origin cors Response synthesized by a service worker (#629) (Wednesday, 8 November)
- Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Create F2F agenda - 7 November 2017 (#1206) (Monday, 6 November)
- Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Create F2F agenda - 7 November 2017 (#1206) (Sunday, 5 November)
- Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Making a concurrent request for navigations (#920) (Friday, 3 November)
- Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] async waitUntil() does not allow extension on final promise resolution? (#1039) (Friday, 3 November)
- Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Service Worker makes AJAX Progress Listener not Working (#1141) (Friday, 3 November)
- Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] error handling for aborted streams feeding a navigation request (#1184) (Friday, 3 November)
- Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Reduce GC exposure (#1127) (Friday, 3 November)
- Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Service Worker makes AJAX Progress Listener not Working (#1141) (Friday, 3 November)
- Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] reflect internal "parsed" state in ServiceWorkerState enum (#1162) (Friday, 3 November)
- Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] error handling for aborted streams feeding a navigation request (#1184) (Friday, 3 November)
- Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Create F2F agenda - 7 November 2017 (#1206) (Friday, 3 November)
- Re: [whatwg/fetch] Use the URL from the response, if it has one (#146) (Friday, 3 November)
- Re: [whatwg/fetch] Use the URL from the response, if it has one (#146) (Thursday, 2 November)
- Re: [whatwg/fetch] Use the URL from the response, if it has one (#146) (Wednesday, 1 November)
- Re: [whatwg/fetch] Use the URL from the response, if it has one (#146) (Wednesday, 1 November)
- Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Proposal: Allow addEventListener/removeEventListener for 'fetch' to called at anytime (#1195) (Wednesday, 1 November)
Benjamin Gruenbaum
Benoit Girard
Bobby Holley
Boris Zbarsky
Bradley Meck
Brandon Jones
Brett Zamir
Brian Kardell
C. Van Wiemeersch
Caleb Williams
camillelamy
Caridy Patiño
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] [template] How to remove a listener registered on createCallback (#708) (Tuesday, 14 November)
- [w3c/webcomponents] [template] What if the `type` attribute is specified in the <template> but its processor is not registered? (#709) (Monday, 13 November)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] [template]How to remove a listener registered on createCallback (#708) (Monday, 13 November)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] [templates] Allow removal of boolean attributes (#705) (Friday, 10 November)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] [templates] How featureful should the default processor be? (#682) (Saturday, 4 November)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] [idea] Allow custom element naming on a per-shadow-root basis. (#488) (Friday, 3 November)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] [templates] How featureful should the default processor be? (#682) (Friday, 3 November)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] [templates] Consider ${foo} instead of {{foo}} (#688) (Friday, 3 November)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] [templates] If HTML Template Instantiation proposal is adopted, consider a HTML-native syntax (#695) (Friday, 3 November)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] [templates] Consider ${foo} instead of {{foo}} (#688) (Friday, 3 November)
chaals
chcunningham
Chris Dumez
Chris Lilley
Chris Matheson
Chris Rebert
cynthia
Cyril Auburtin
d2ydx2
Daniel Appelquist
Daniel Gidman
Daniel Huigens
Daniel Olano
Dave Tapuska
David Bokan
David Hill
davidcblack
daxiangaikafei
ddorwin
dejan9393
dfabulich
Dmitri Zagidulin
Domenic Denicola
- Re: [whatwg/streams] WIP: allow creating streams from specs while using fewer JS objects (#857) (Thursday, 30 November)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] [templates] Allow removal of boolean attributes (#705) (Thursday, 30 November)
- Re: [whatwg/streams] WIP: allow creating streams from specs while using fewer JS objects (#857) (Thursday, 30 November)
- Re: [whatwg/streams] How much latitude should implementations have in looking up transformer.transform()? (#691) (Thursday, 30 November)
- Re: [whatwg/streams] WIP: allow creating streams from specs while using fewer JS objects (#857) (Wednesday, 29 November)
- Re: [whatwg/streams] Make it easy to create streams with no underlying source/sink/transformer objects, from specs (#813) (Wednesday, 29 November)
- Re: [whatwg/streams] WIP: allow creating streams from specs while using fewer JS objects (#857) (Wednesday, 29 November)
- Re: [whatwg/streams] WIP: allow creating streams from specs while using fewer JS objects (#857) (Wednesday, 29 November)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] WebPlatform Web Components F2F 2018 (#713) (Wednesday, 29 November)
- Re: [whatwg/streams] WIP: allow creating streams from specs while using fewer JS objects (#857) (Tuesday, 28 November)
- Re: [whatwg/streams] WIP: allow creating streams from specs while using fewer JS objects (#857) (Tuesday, 28 November)
- Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Allow using async event handlers instead of waitUntil() and respondWith() (#1235) (Monday, 27 November)
- Re: [whatwg/fetch] "3.3.1. ..." Allow on empty content-type (#636) (Thursday, 23 November)
- Re: [whatwg/streams] WIP: allow creating streams from specs while using fewer JS objects (#857) (Saturday, 18 November)
- Re: [whatwg/streams] WIP: allow creating streams from specs while using fewer JS objects (#857) (Friday, 17 November)
- Re: [whatwg/streams] Don't error canceled branches when erroring a teed stream (#859) (Friday, 17 November)
- Re: [whatwg/streams] Don't error canceled branches when erroring a teed stream (#859) (Friday, 17 November)
- Re: [whatwg/streams] WIP: allow creating streams from specs while using fewer JS objects (#857) (Friday, 17 November)
- Re: [whatwg/streams] WIP: allow creating streams from specs while using fewer JS objects (#857) (Friday, 17 November)
- Re: [whatwg/streams] Branch snapshot missing for algorithm-slots branch (#858) (Friday, 17 November)
- Re: [whatwg/streams] Branch snapshot missing for algorithm-slots branch (#858) (Friday, 17 November)
- Re: [whatwg/streams] Branch snapshot missing for algorithm-slots branch (#858) (Friday, 17 November)
- Re: [whatwg/streams] Branch snapshot missing for algorithm-slots branch (#858) (Friday, 17 November)
- Re: [whatwg/streams] [Question] I created a project that explains the spec (#848) (Friday, 17 November)
- Re: [whatwg/streams] [Question] I created a project that explains the spec (#848) (Friday, 17 November)
- Re: [whatwg/streams] Constructing ReadableStream and WritableStream in TransformStream constructor (#850) (Friday, 17 November)
- [whatwg/streams] WIP: allow creating streams from specs while using fewer JS objects (#857) (Thursday, 16 November)
- Re: [whatwg/streams] Make it easy to create streams with no underlying source/sink/transformer objects, from specs (#813) (Thursday, 16 November)
- Re: [whatwg/streams] Prohibit setting a strategy size for byte streams (#856) (Thursday, 16 November)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] No way to resolve a Promise with a cross domain WindowProxy (#536) (Thursday, 16 November)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] No way to resolve a Promise with a cross domain WindowProxy (#536) (Thursday, 16 November)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] No way to resolve a Promise with a cross domain WindowProxy (#536) (Thursday, 16 November)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] No way to resolve a Promise with a cross domain WindowProxy (#536) (Thursday, 16 November)
- Re: [whatwg/fetch] WebSocket connections don't appear to send referrers (#630) (Wednesday, 15 November)
- Re: [whatwg/fetch] WebSocket connections don't appear to send referrers (#630) (Wednesday, 15 November)
- [whatwg/fetch] WebSocket connections don't appear to send referrers (#630) (Wednesday, 15 November)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] [templates] If HTML Template Instantiation proposal is adopted, consider a HTML-native syntax (#695) (Tuesday, 14 November)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] [templates] Is a global registry of template processors the right idea? (#681) (Tuesday, 14 November)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] [templates] What is declareCallback? (#693) (Tuesday, 14 November)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] [template] What if the `type` attribute is specified in the <template> but its processor is not registered? (#709) (Tuesday, 14 November)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] [templates] Do not specify template binding syntax in spec, make configurable (#697) (Tuesday, 14 November)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] [templates] Do not specify template binding syntax in spec, make configurable (#697) (Tuesday, 14 November)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] [templates] Consider ${foo} instead of {{foo}} (#688) (Tuesday, 14 November)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] [templates] Consider ${foo} instead of {{foo}} (#688) (Tuesday, 14 November)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] [templates] If HTML Template Instantiation proposal is adopted, consider a HTML-native syntax (#695) (Tuesday, 14 November)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] [templates] If HTML Template Instantiation proposal is adopted, consider a HTML-native syntax (#695) (Tuesday, 14 November)
- Re: [heycam/webidl] Proposed solution to make grammar changes less disruptive (#477) (Tuesday, 14 November)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Add `customElements.upgrade` (#710) (Tuesday, 14 November)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] [templates] If HTML Template Instantiation proposal is adopted, consider a HTML-native syntax (#695) (Tuesday, 14 November)
- Re: [whatwg/streams] Remove transform streams tests as they are now upstream (#854) (Sunday, 12 November)
- Re: [w3c/uievents] Update event-types.txt: Not all wheel events are cancelable. (#171) (Sunday, 12 November)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] [templates] Allow removal of boolean attributes (#705) (Saturday, 11 November)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] [templates] Allow removal of boolean attributes (#705) (Friday, 10 November)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] [templates] Allow removal of boolean attributes (#705) (Friday, 10 November)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] [templates] Allow removal of boolean attributes (#705) (Friday, 10 November)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] [templates] Allow removal of boolean attributes (#705) (Friday, 10 November)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] [templates] Allow removal of boolean attributes (#705) (Friday, 10 November)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] [templates] Allow removal of boolean attributes (#705) (Friday, 10 November)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] [templates] How featureful should the default processor be? (#682) (Friday, 10 November)
- Re: [w3c/uievents] Update event-types.txt: Not all wheel events are cancelable. (#171) (Friday, 10 November)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Reserve hyphenated or `$`-including properties for customization (#700) (Wednesday, 8 November)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Reserve hyphenated or `$`-including properties for customization (#700) (Wednesday, 8 November)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Reserve hyphenated or `$`-including properties/attributes for customization (#700) (Wednesday, 8 November)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Reserve hyphenated or `$`-including properties/attributes for customization (#700) (Wednesday, 8 November)
- Re: [whatwg/streams] How much latitude should implementations have in looking up transformer.transform()? (#691) (Tuesday, 7 November)
- Re: [whatwg/fetch] Expose Content-Length header in CORS requests (#622) (Monday, 6 November)
- Re: [whatwg/fetch] Expose Content-Length header in CORS requests (#622) (Monday, 6 November)
- Re: [whatwg/fetch] Expose Content-Length header in CORS requests (#622) (Monday, 6 November)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] MutationObserver needs an equivalent of disconnected & connected callbacks (#533) (Saturday, 4 November)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] [templates] How featureful should the default processor be? (#682) (Saturday, 4 November)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] [templates] How featureful should the default processor be? (#682) (Saturday, 4 November)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] [templates] How featureful should the default processor be? (#682) (Saturday, 4 November)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] [templates] How featureful should the default processor be? (#682) (Friday, 3 November)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] [templates] How featureful should the default processor be? (#682) (Friday, 3 November)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] [templates] Consider ${foo} instead of {{foo}} (#688) (Friday, 3 November)
- [w3c/webcomponents] [templates] What is declareCallback? (#693) (Thursday, 2 November)
- Re: [whatwg/streams] Constructing ReadableStream and WritableStream in TransformStream constructor (#850) (Thursday, 2 November)
- Re: [whatwg/streams] Meta: use the common deploy.sh (with POST_BUILD_STEP) (#849) (Thursday, 2 November)
- Re: [whatwg/streams] Test that TransformStream does not use global constructors (#852) (Thursday, 2 November)
- [w3c/webcomponents] [templates] API for updating (#685) (Thursday, 2 November)
- [w3c/webcomponents] [templates] No need for -Callback suffix (#684) (Thursday, 2 November)
- [w3c/webcomponents] [templates] Maybe each {{ ~ }} should be its own text node? (#683) (Thursday, 2 November)
- [w3c/webcomponents] [templates] How featureful should the default processor be? (#682) (Thursday, 2 November)
- [w3c/webcomponents] [templates] Is a global registry of template processors the right idea? (#681) (Thursday, 2 November)
- [w3c/webcomponents] [templates] Parts APIs surface concerns (#680) (Thursday, 2 November)
- Re: [whatwg/streams] Meta: use the common deploy.sh (with POST_BUILD_STEP) (#849) (Thursday, 2 November)
- [whatwg/streams] Move transform stream tests to web platform tests (#851) (Thursday, 2 November)
- Re: [whatwg/streams] Constructing ReadableStream and WritableStream in TransformStream constructor (#850) (Wednesday, 1 November)
- Re: [whatwg/streams] Meta: use the common deploy.sh (with POST_BUILD_STEP) (#849) (Wednesday, 1 November)
- Re: [whatwg/streams] Add an example of a transform stream that replaces template tags (#846) (Wednesday, 1 November)
- Re: [whatwg/streams] Add SyncOneToOneTransformFunctionAdaptor example (#843) (Wednesday, 1 November)
Dominique Hazael-Massieux
drwez
Elliott Sprehn
Emily Stark
Emrah Bilbay
Eric Newport
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] [templates] If HTML Template Instantiation proposal is adopted, consider a HTML-native syntax (#695) (Tuesday, 14 November)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] [templates] If HTML Template Instantiation proposal is adopted, consider a HTML-native syntax (#695) (Tuesday, 14 November)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] [templates] If HTML Template Instantiation proposal is adopted, consider a HTML-native syntax (#695) (Tuesday, 14 November)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] [templates] If HTML Template Instantiation proposal is adopted, consider a HTML-native syntax (#695) (Tuesday, 14 November)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] [templates] If HTML Template Instantiation proposal is adopted, consider a HTML-native syntax (#695) (Tuesday, 14 November)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] [templates] If HTML Template Instantiation proposal is adopted, consider a HTML-native syntax (#695) (Tuesday, 14 November)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] [templates] If HTML Template Instantiation proposal is adopted, consider a HTML-native syntax (#695) (Monday, 13 November)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] [templates] If HTML Template Instantiation proposal is adopted, consider a HTML-native syntax (#695) (Friday, 3 November)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] [templates] If HTML Template Instantiation proposal is adopted, consider a HTML-native syntax (#695) (Friday, 3 November)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] [templates] If HTML Template Instantiation proposal is adopted, consider a HTML-native syntax (#695) (Friday, 3 November)
- [w3c/webcomponents] [templates] If HTML Template Instantiation proposal is adopted, consider a HTML-native syntax (#695) (Friday, 3 November)
Eric Oyler
Evan You
Felipe Nascimento de Moura
Fuqiao Xue
Gary Kacmarcik
Gerard Tyedmers
Giovanni Lovato
Govza
guest271314
Hadley Beeman
Hannan Ali
Haroen Viaene
Harris Hancock
Hayato Ito
Henri Sivonen
Hiroki Nakagawa
Honza Bambas
Ian Clelland
Ilya Grigorik
Jake Archibald
- Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Cache.addAll() and .add() needs to accept an init argument to use for fetch() (#1233) (Monday, 27 November)
- Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Cache.addAll() and .add() needs to accept an init argument to use for fetch() (#1233) (Monday, 27 November)
- Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Allow using async event handlers instead of waitUntil() and respondWith() (#1235) (Monday, 27 November)
- Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] WindowClient.navigate() behavior for reserved clients and in-flight navigations (#1123) (Thursday, 23 November)
- Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Client.reserved references wrong context state? (#1030) (Thursday, 23 November)
- Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Client.reserved references wrong context state? (#1030) (Thursday, 23 November)
- Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] reserved Client objects and redirected navigations (#1031) (Thursday, 23 November)
- Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] reserved Client objects and redirected navigations (#1031) (Thursday, 23 November)
- Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] clarify that Client "creation order" means when reserved Client created (#1078) (Thursday, 23 November)
- Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] clarify that Client "creation order" means when reserved Client created (#1078) (Thursday, 23 November)
- Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] what should Client.url return for a reserved Worker Client? (#1034) (Thursday, 23 November)
- Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] what should Client.url return for a reserved Worker Client? (#1034) (Thursday, 23 November)
- Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] postMessage() to a reserved client throws (#1035) (Thursday, 23 November)
- Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] postMessage() to a reserved client throws (#1035) (Thursday, 23 November)
- Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Navigating reserved clients (#1215) (Thursday, 23 November)
- Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Navigating reserved clients (#1215) (Thursday, 23 November)
- Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Introduce a parallel queue for running Jobs (#1229) (Tuesday, 21 November)
- Re: [whatwg/fetch] Use request's current url as base URL in redirects (#633) (Tuesday, 21 November)
- Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Introduce a parallel queue for running Jobs (#1229) (Tuesday, 21 November)
- Re: [whatwg/fetch] Generic Accept header value */* and Service Workers (#634) (Monday, 20 November)
- [w3c/ServiceWorker] Merge with storage (#1230) (Monday, 20 November)
- Re: [whatwg/storage] Bucket hooks (#18) (Monday, 20 November)
- Re: [whatwg/storage] Bucket hooks (#18) (Monday, 20 November)
- Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Introduce a parallel queue for running Jobs (#1229) (Monday, 20 November)
- Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Introduce a parallel queue for running Jobs (#1229) (Monday, 20 November)
- Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Remove foreign fetch (#1207) (Thursday, 16 November)
- Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Remove foreign fetch (#1207) (Thursday, 16 November)
- Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Remove foreign fetch (#1207) (Thursday, 16 November)
- Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Remove foreign fetch (#1207) (Thursday, 16 November)
- Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Handing fetch termination (#1178) (Thursday, 16 November)
- Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Handing fetch termination (#1178) (Thursday, 16 November)
- Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Block 206s entering the cache (via put & addAll) (#937) (Thursday, 16 November)
- Re: [whatwg/fetch] consider failing same-origin fetch requests that get a cross-origin cors Response synthesized by a service worker (#629) (Saturday, 11 November)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] [templates] Allow removal of boolean attributes (#705) (Friday, 10 November)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] [templates] Allow removal of boolean attributes (#705) (Friday, 10 November)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] [templates] Allow removal of boolean attributes (#705) (Friday, 10 November)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] [templates] Allow removal of boolean attributes (#705) (Friday, 10 November)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] [templates] How to handle expressions in tables (#703) (Friday, 10 November)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] [templates] Allow removal of boolean attributes (#705) (Friday, 10 November)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] [templates] Allow removal of boolean attributes (#705) (Friday, 10 November)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] [templates] Allow removal of boolean attributes (#705) (Friday, 10 November)
- [w3c/webcomponents] [templates] Allow removal of boolean attributes (#705) (Friday, 10 November)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] [templates] Ensure that template instantiation actually improves the platform (#704) (Friday, 10 November)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] [templates] How to handle expressions in tables (#703) (Friday, 10 November)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] [templates] How to handle expressions in tables (#703) (Friday, 10 November)
- Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Proposal: FetchEvent.navigationLoadType (#1167) (Thursday, 9 November)
- Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Proposal: FetchEvent.navigationLoadType (#1167) (Thursday, 9 November)
- Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Proposal: FetchEvent.navigationLoadType (#1167) (Thursday, 9 November)
- Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] _Update algorithm should unregister SW on 404 and 410 errors (#204) (Wednesday, 8 November)
- Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] consider firing a "clientcontrolled" event on ServiceWorkerGlobalScope (#886) (Wednesday, 8 November)
- Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Proposal: Allow addEventListener/removeEventListener for 'fetch' to called at anytime (#1195) (Wednesday, 8 November)
- Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Consider mechanisms to bypass the service worker for things that we know won't be in it's cache (#1026) (Wednesday, 8 November)
- Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Proposal: FetchEvent.navigationLoadType (#1167) (Wednesday, 8 November)
- Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] _Update algorithm should unregister SW on 404 and 410 errors (#204) (Tuesday, 7 November)
- Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] _Update algorithm should unregister SW on 404 and 410 errors (#204) (Tuesday, 7 November)
- Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] is the browser required to start the ServiceWorker for postMessage() if there is no message event handler? (#1200) (Tuesday, 7 November)
- Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Does changing updateViaCache mint a new ServiceWorkerRegistration or update them all? (#1189) (Tuesday, 7 November)
- Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] "no-cors" CSS SOP violation (#719) (Tuesday, 7 November)
- Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] "no-cors" CSS SOP violation (#719) (Tuesday, 7 November)
- Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] async waitUntil microtask issue (#1213) (Tuesday, 7 November)
- Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Create F2F agenda - 7 November 2017 (#1206) (Tuesday, 7 November)
- Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] What happens to the request body if the fetch isn't handled? (#1191) (Tuesday, 7 November)
- Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Remove foreign fetch (#1207) (Tuesday, 7 November)
- Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] resurrected service workers don't fire an activate event which may break expectations (#1204) (Tuesday, 7 November)
- Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Create F2F agenda - 7 November 2017 (#1206) (Tuesday, 7 November)
- Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Create F2F agenda - 7 November 2017 (#1206) (Tuesday, 7 November)
- Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] WindowClient.navigate() behavior for reserved clients and in-flight navigations (#1123) (Tuesday, 7 November)
- Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] consider Client behavior for windows where initial about:blank is replaced with a loaded document (#1091) (Tuesday, 7 November)
- Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Should we expose reserved clients? (#1216) (Tuesday, 7 November)
- Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Create F2F agenda - 7 November 2017 (#1206) (Tuesday, 7 November)
- Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Create F2F agenda - 7 November 2017 (#1206) (Monday, 6 November)
- Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Create F2F agenda - 7 November 2017 (#1206) (Monday, 6 November)
- Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Find a way for service workers to get their current state (#1077) (Friday, 3 November)
- Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Support restarting download when storing large resources in Cache (#713) (Friday, 3 November)
- Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Support restarting download when storing large resources in Cache (#713) (Friday, 3 November)
- Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Allow overlapping scopes (#1085) (Friday, 3 November)
- Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Feature request: Provide a way to delay execution of a new service worker (#1208) (Friday, 3 November)
- Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Feature request: Provide a way to delay execution of a new service worker (#1208) (Friday, 3 November)
- Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Installing a foreign SW as part of a subresource request (#825) (Friday, 3 November)
- Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Installing a foreign SW as part of a subresource request (#825) (Friday, 3 November)
- Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Foreign fetch vs non-credentialed requests (#878) (Friday, 3 November)
- Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Foreign fetch vs non-credentialed requests (#878) (Friday, 3 November)
- Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] CORS pre-flight for foreign fetch (#880) (Friday, 3 November)
- Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] CORS pre-flight for foreign fetch (#880) (Friday, 3 November)
- Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Foreign fetch and no-referrer Referrer Policy (#899) (Friday, 3 November)
- Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Foreign fetch and no-referrer Referrer Policy (#899) (Friday, 3 November)
- Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Making a concurrent request for navigations (#920) (Friday, 3 November)
- Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Making a concurrent request for navigations (#920) (Friday, 3 November)
- Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Using BroadcastChannel to wake up a service worker (#975) (Friday, 3 November)
- Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Using BroadcastChannel to wake up a service worker (#975) (Friday, 3 November)
- Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Allow Caching of POST requests (#977) (Friday, 3 November)
- Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Define procedure to convert options object of `sw.register()` to `Link` header (#979) (Friday, 3 November)
- Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] registerForeignFetch({ origins, scope }) optional (#982) (Friday, 3 November)
- Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] registerForeignFetch({ origins, scope }) optional (#982) (Friday, 3 November)
- Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] async waitUntil() does not allow extension on final promise resolution? (#1039) (Friday, 3 November)
- Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] async waitUntil() does not allow extension on final promise resolution? (#1039) (Friday, 3 November)
- Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] clientId on ForeignFetchEvents (#1017) (Friday, 3 November)
- Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] clientId on ForeignFetchEvents (#1017) (Friday, 3 November)
- Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] consider allowing static routing only for "foreign fetch" for anonymous requests (#1024) (Friday, 3 November)
- Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] consider allowing static routing only for "foreign fetch" for anonymous requests (#1024) (Friday, 3 November)
- Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] `Clients.matchAll()` should exclude the current environment (#1037) (Friday, 3 November)
- Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Find a way for service workers to get their current state (#1077) (Friday, 3 November)
- Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Find a way for service workers to get their current state (#1077) (Friday, 3 November)
- Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] async waitUntil() does not allow extension on final promise resolution? (#1039) (Friday, 3 November)
- Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Add async iteration to the cache API (#1066) (Friday, 3 November)
- Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] no way for using a websocket inside a service worker (#1072) (Friday, 3 November)
- Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] no way for using a websocket inside a service worker (#1072) (Friday, 3 November)
- Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Service worker ID - remove? (#1076) (Friday, 3 November)
- Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Find a way for service workers to get their current state (#1077) (Friday, 3 November)
- Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Service Worker makes AJAX Progress Listener not Working (#1141) (Friday, 3 November)
- Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] No event for knowing when service worker is not available (#1082) (Friday, 3 November)
- Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] No event for knowing when service worker is not available (#1082) (Friday, 3 November)
- Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Allow overlapping scopes (#1085) (Friday, 3 November)
- Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Allow overlapping scopes (#1085) (Friday, 3 November)
- Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Safety versus simplicity in specification tests (#1087) (Friday, 3 November)
- Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Safety versus simplicity in specification tests (#1087) (Friday, 3 November)
- Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Is there any way for a web page to see if their requests will be intercepted by a foreign fetch handler? (#1092) (Friday, 3 November)
- Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Is there any way for a web page to see if their requests will be intercepted by a foreign fetch handler? (#1092) (Friday, 3 November)
- Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] how does service worker interact with html imports? (#1095) (Friday, 3 November)
- Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] how does service worker interact with html imports? (#1095) (Friday, 3 November)
- Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Change the spec so that when a new SW is being registered it's set to not use cache the first time (#1103) (Friday, 3 November)
- Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Touching documents in an "in parallel" section makes no sense (#1108) (Friday, 3 November)
- Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Confusing "Updating a service worker" section in explainer (#1111) (Friday, 3 November)
- Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Confusing "Updating a service worker" section in explainer (#1111) (Friday, 3 November)
- [w3c/ServiceWorker] FetchEvent init preloadResponse should be option. Fixes #1114. (#1219) (Friday, 3 November)
- Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Should a service worker be allowed to register new service workers? (#1117) (Friday, 3 November)
- Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Reduce GC exposure (#1127) (Friday, 3 November)
- Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] clients.get() should resolve with null instead of undefined (#1133) (Friday, 3 November)
- Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] clients.get() should resolve with null instead of undefined (#1133) (Friday, 3 November)
- Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Priority of requests (feature request) (#1137) (Friday, 3 November)
- Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Priority of requests (feature request) (#1137) (Friday, 3 November)
- Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Service Worker makes AJAX Progress Listener not Working (#1141) (Friday, 3 November)
- Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Use ASCII serialization for origins (#1151) (Friday, 3 November)
- Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] event.waitUntil/respondWith vs return promise (#1148) (Friday, 3 November)
- Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] event.waitUntil/respondWith vs return promise (#1148) (Friday, 3 November)
- Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Proposal: pass custom params in ServiceWorkerRegistration for future use (#1157) (Friday, 3 November)
- Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Proposal: pass custom params in ServiceWorkerRegistration for future use (#1157) (Friday, 3 November)
- Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] reflect internal "parsed" state in ServiceWorkerState enum (#1162) (Friday, 3 November)
- Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Allow `None` as value for `Service-Worker-Allowed`. (#1165) (Friday, 3 November)
- Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Cross origin error due to htaccess restrictions (#1181) (Friday, 3 November)
- Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Cross origin error due to htaccess restrictions (#1181) (Friday, 3 November)
- Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] error handling for aborted streams feeding a navigation request (#1184) (Friday, 3 November)
- Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Create F2F agenda - 7 November 2017 (#1206) (Friday, 3 November)
- Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Making functional events simpler (#1199) (Friday, 3 November)
- Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Feature request: Provide a way to delay execution of a new service worker (#1208) (Friday, 3 November)
- Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] add w3cid for editors to help publication (#1218) (Friday, 3 November)
- Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Feature request: Make updatefound an ExtendableEvent (#1208) (Thursday, 2 November)
- Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Meta: mention type:untestable and type:missing-coverage wpt labels (#1211) (Thursday, 2 November)
- Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Meta: mention type:untestable and type:missing-coverage wpt labels (#1211) (Thursday, 2 November)
- Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Block partial responses entering the cache (#1210) (Thursday, 2 November)
- Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] async waitUntil microtask issue (#1213) (Thursday, 2 November)
- Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] add w3cid for editors to help publication (#1218) (Thursday, 2 November)
- Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Clarity: "is dispatched a set of" (#1214) (Thursday, 2 November)
- Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Clarity: "is dispatched a set of" (#1214) (Thursday, 2 November)
- [w3c/ServiceWorker] Minor grammar issue. Fixes #1214. (#1217) (Thursday, 2 November)
- Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Should we expose reserved clients? (#1216) (Thursday, 2 November)
- Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Navigating reserved clients (#1215) (Thursday, 2 November)
- Re: [whatwg/fetch] Use the URL from the response, if it has one (#146) (Wednesday, 1 November)
James Browning
Jason Sebring
Jeremy Danyow
JF Bastien
JingAn Chen
Joe Pea
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] [idea] Make use of `observedAttributes` optional (#565) (Sunday, 19 November)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] Shadow: Specify when `slotchange` fires (#447) (Tuesday, 14 November)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Why do we really need hyphens? (#658) (Saturday, 4 November)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] [idea] Allow custom element naming on a per-shadow-root basis. (#488) (Friday, 3 November)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] [idea] Allow custom element naming on a per-shadow-root basis. (#488) (Friday, 3 November)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] [idea] Allow custom element naming on a per-shadow-root basis. (#488) (Friday, 3 November)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] Why don't we have CSS VR? (#527) (Friday, 3 November)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] [idea] Allow custom element naming on a per-shadow-root basis. (#488) (Friday, 3 November)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] [idea] Allow custom element naming on a per-shadow-root basis. (#488) (Thursday, 2 November)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] [idea] Allow custom element naming on a per-shadow-root basis. (#488) (Thursday, 2 November)
- [whatwg/dom] Why don't we have CSS VR? (#527) (Thursday, 2 November)
Johannes Wilm
Jonathon Kereliuk
Josh Karlin
Joshua Bell
- Re: [w3c/FileAPI] Add BlobPropertyBag.endings back to the spec. (#90) (Wednesday, 29 November)
- Re: [w3c/FileAPI] Document BlobPropertyBag "endings", or keep pushing to remove? (#46) (Monday, 27 November)
- Re: [w3c/IndexedDB] indexedDb The first time using the index query takes too long (#225) (Friday, 24 November)
- Re: [w3c/IndexedDB] indexedDb The first time using the index query takes too long (#225) (Friday, 24 November)
- Re: [w3c/FileAPI] Implementations allow all values in type getter (#43) (Friday, 24 November)
- [w3ctag/design-reviews] Web Locks API (#217) (Friday, 10 November)
- Re: [whatwg/storage] Rename boxes to bins (#52) (Friday, 10 November)
- Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Files and Directory Entries API with webkit prefixes! (#215) (Thursday, 9 November)
- Re: [w3c/IndexedDB] Prebuilt IndexedDB format (#224) (Thursday, 9 November)
- Re: [w3c/IndexedDB] boolean should be a valid key (#76) (Thursday, 9 November)
- Re: [w3c/WebPlatformWG] TPAC agenda: Thu Nov 9 (WebPlat general) (#94) (Friday, 3 November)
juj
Jungkee Song
- Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] what happens if an initial about:blank inherits a controller, but its navigation request does not match any service worker? (#1232) (Tuesday, 28 November)
- Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Please default fetch() init credentials to 'same-origin' (#1234) (Tuesday, 28 November)
- Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] what happens if an initial about:blank inherits a controller, but its navigation request does not match any service worker? (#1232) (Thursday, 23 November)
- Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] what happens if an initial about:blank inherits a controller, but its navigation request does not match any service worker? (#1232) (Thursday, 23 November)
- Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] what happens if an initial about:blank inherits a controller, but its navigation request does not match any service worker? (#1232) (Thursday, 23 November)
- Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Introduce a parallel queue for running Jobs (#1229) (Tuesday, 21 November)
- Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Introduce a parallel queue for running Jobs (#1229) (Tuesday, 21 November)
- Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Introduce a parallel queue for running Jobs (#1229) (Tuesday, 21 November)
- Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Introduce a parallel queue for running Jobs (#1229) (Tuesday, 21 November)
- Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Introduce a parallel queue for running Jobs (#1229) (Tuesday, 21 November)
- [w3c/ServiceWorker] Introduce a parallel queue for running Jobs (#1229) (Friday, 17 November)
- Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Remove <link rel=serviceworker> (#1220) (Friday, 17 November)
- Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] when will navigation `FetchEvent.resultingClientId` have a reserved client and not an initial about:blank client? (#1228) (Friday, 17 November)
- Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Clarity: "is dispatched a set of" (#1214) (Friday, 17 November)
- Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Minor grammar issue. Fixes #1214. (#1217) (Friday, 17 November)
- Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Remove <link rel=serviceworker> (#1220) (Friday, 17 November)
- Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Block 206s entering the cache (via put & addAll) (#937) (Thursday, 16 November)
- Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Block partial responses entering the cache (#1210) (Thursday, 16 November)
- Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Block 206s entering the cache (via put & addAll) (#937) (Thursday, 16 November)
- Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Block 206s entering the cache (via put & addAll) (#937) (Thursday, 16 November)
- Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] FetchEvent init preloadResponse should be optional. Fixes #1114. (#1219) (Thursday, 16 November)
- Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Remove foreign fetch (#1207) (Thursday, 16 November)
- [w3c/ServiceWorker] Clean up prose about waitUntil on install & activate events (#1227) (Thursday, 16 November)
- Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Making functional events simpler (#1199) (Thursday, 16 November)
- Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Making functional events simpler (#1199) (Thursday, 16 November)
- Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Handing fetch termination (#1178) (Thursday, 16 November)
- Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Run Job does not specify which event loop to queue its tasks on (#1224) (Wednesday, 15 November)
- Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Minor grammar issue. Fixes #1214. (#1217) (Wednesday, 8 November)
- Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Create F2F agenda - 7 November 2017 (#1206) (Friday, 3 November)
- Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Navigating reserved clients (#1215) (Thursday, 2 November)
Justin Fagnani
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] [templates] Contextual auto-escaping (#711) (Tuesday, 14 November)
- [w3c/webcomponents] [templates] Contextual auto-escaping (#711) (Tuesday, 14 November)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Add `customElements.upgrade` (#710) (Monday, 13 November)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] [templates] If HTML Template Instantiation proposal is adopted, consider a HTML-native syntax (#695) (Monday, 13 November)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] HTML Modules (#645) (Friday, 10 November)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] [templates] How to handle expressions in tables (#703) (Friday, 10 November)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] [templates] How to handle expressions in tables (#703) (Friday, 10 November)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] [templates] implement a polyfill of template-instantiation before even considering to add the API natively to the platform (#702) (Friday, 10 November)
- [w3c/webcomponents] [templates] How to handle expressions in tables (#703) (Friday, 10 November)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] [templates] How featureful should the default processor be? (#682) (Saturday, 4 November)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] [templates] If HTML Template Instantiation proposal is adopted, consider a HTML-native syntax (#695) (Saturday, 4 November)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] MutationObserver needs an equivalent of disconnected & connected callbacks (#533) (Saturday, 4 November)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] [templates] Maybe each {{ ~ }} should be its own text node? (#683) (Saturday, 4 November)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] [templates] Maybe each {{ ~ }} should be its own text node? (#683) (Saturday, 4 November)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] [templates] How featureful should the default processor be? (#682) (Friday, 3 November)
Justin Novosad
JustOff
Jxck
Kagami Sascha Rosylight
Keith Cirkel
Ken Wilson
Kenneth Rohde Christiansen
Kirtan Gajjar
Kunihiko Sakamoto
L. David Baron
- Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] saveData attribute in Network Information API (#204) (Wednesday, 29 November)
- Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Modeling media auto-playing as a permission? (#203) (Wednesday, 29 November)
- Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] "With Credentials" flag possibly inconsistent with web architecture (#76) (Wednesday, 29 November)
- Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] "With Credentials" flag possibly inconsistent with web architecture (#76) (Tuesday, 28 November)
- Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Modeling media auto-playing as a permission? (#203) (Tuesday, 28 November)
- Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Request review for Scroll Boundary Behavior (#193) (Tuesday, 21 November)
- Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Modeling media auto-playing as a permission? (#203) (Tuesday, 21 November)
- Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Serialization of natural language in data formats such as JSON [I18N] (#178) (Tuesday, 21 November)
- Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Modeling media auto-playing as a permission? (#203) (Wednesday, 15 November)
- Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Serialization of natural language in data formats such as JSON [I18N] (#178) (Tuesday, 7 November)
- Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Privacy Mode (#101) (Tuesday, 7 November)
Léonie Watson
- Re: [w3c/WebPlatformWG] TPAC agenda: Fri Nov 10 (Web Components) (#95) (Tuesday, 14 November)
- Re: [w3c/WebPlatformWG] TPAC agenda: Fri Nov 10 (Web Components) (#95) (Tuesday, 14 November)
- Re: [w3c/screen-orientation] Wide review tracker (#102) (Friday, 10 November)
- Re: [w3c/IndexedDB] Implementation report (#213) (Friday, 10 November)
- Re: [w3c/IndexedDB] Implementation report (#213) (Friday, 10 November)
- Re: [w3c/screen-orientation] Wide review tracker (#102) (Friday, 10 November)
- Re: [w3c/screen-orientation] Wide review tracker (#102) (Friday, 10 November)
- Re: [w3c/WebPlatformWG] TPAC agenda: Thu Nov 9 (WebPlat general) (#94) (Friday, 10 November)
- Re: [w3c/WebPlatformWG] TPAC agenda: Thu Nov 9 (WebPlat general) (#94) (Friday, 10 November)
- Re: [w3c/screen-orientation] Wide review tracker (#102) (Friday, 10 November)
- Re: [w3c/gamepad] Time at TPAC? (#60) (Friday, 10 November)
- Re: [w3c/push-api] Wide review tracker (#265) (Thursday, 9 November)
- Re: [w3c/WebPlatformWG] TPAC agenda: Tue Nov 7 (Editing TF) (#93) (Thursday, 9 November)
- Re: [w3c/WebPlatformWG] TPAC agenda: Tue Nov 7 (Editing TF) (#93) (Thursday, 9 November)
- Re: [w3c/WebPlatformWG] TPAC agenda: Thu Nov 9 (WebPlat general) (#94) (Thursday, 9 November)
- Re: [w3c/WebPlatformWG] TPAC agenda: Thu Nov 9 (WebPlat general) (#94) (Saturday, 4 November)
- Re: [w3c/WebPlatformWG] TPAC agenda: Fri Nov 10 (Web Components) (#95) (Saturday, 4 November)
- Re: [w3c/WebPlatformWG] TPAC agenda: Thu Nov 9 (WebPlat general) (#94) (Saturday, 4 November)
- Re: [w3c/WebPlatformWG] TPAC agenda: Tue Nov 7 (Editing TF) (#93) (Saturday, 4 November)
Maciej Stachowiak
Maga D. Zandaqo
Majid Valipour
Marcos Cáceres
- Re: [w3c/manifest] multilingual description (#628) (Wednesday, 29 November)
- Re: [w3c/manifest] multilingual description (#628) (Wednesday, 29 November)
- Re: [w3c/manifest] Extension point should come after processing other members (#629) (Tuesday, 28 November)
- Re: [w3c/manifest] multilingual description (#628) (Monday, 27 November)
- Re: [w3c/manifest] multilingual description (#628) (Monday, 27 November)
- Re: [heycam/webidl] Some means to signal that a method requires user action to be called (#479) (Friday, 24 November)
- Re: [heycam/webidl] Some means to signal that a method requires user action to be called (#479) (Friday, 24 November)
- [heycam/webidl] Some means to signal that a method requires user action to be called (#479) (Thursday, 23 November)
- Re: [w3c/permissions] Introduce "Automation" section (#151) (Thursday, 16 November)
- Re: [w3c/manifest] Which "platform" should I use for Windows 10 UWP apps? (#580) (Tuesday, 14 November)
- Re: [w3c/manifest] Which "platform" should I use for Windows 10 UWP apps? (#580) (Tuesday, 14 November)
- Re: [w3c/manifest] Allowing only site-triggered install prompt (#627) (Tuesday, 14 November)
- Re: [heycam/webidl] Proposed solution to make grammar changes less disruptive (#477) (Tuesday, 14 November)
- Re: [heycam/webidl] Proposed solution to make grammar changes less disruptive (#477) (Monday, 13 November)
- Re: [w3c/manifest] Add a means to associate a PWA with a file extension (#626) (Saturday, 11 November)
- Re: [w3c/manifest] Add a means to associate a PWA with a file extension (#626) (Friday, 10 November)
- [w3c/manifest] Add a means to associate a PWA with a file extension (#626) (Friday, 10 November)
- Re: [w3c/screen-orientation] Wide review tracker (#102) (Friday, 10 November)
- Re: [w3c/screen-orientation] Wide review tracker (#102) (Friday, 10 November)
- Re: [w3c/permissions] Linked testing policy and fixed a few links (#164) (Tuesday, 7 November)
- Re: [w3c/permissions] Linked testing policy and fixed a few links (#164) (Tuesday, 7 November)
- Re: [w3c/screen-orientation] Confusiong between "_pending-promise_" and "doc's pending promise" (#94) (Sunday, 5 November)
- Re: [w3c/screen-orientation] Reference correct promise at the "apply an orientation lock" operation (#110) (Sunday, 5 November)
- Re: [w3c/screen-orientation] Clean-up anchors and definitions (#109) (Saturday, 4 November)
- Re: [w3c/screen-orientation] Clean-up anchors and definitions (#109) (Saturday, 4 November)
- Re: [w3c/screen-orientation] Reference correct promise at the "apply an orientation lock" operation (#110) (Saturday, 4 November)
- Re: [w3c/screen-orientation] Add [SameObject] to the `Screen.orientation` attribute (#111) (Saturday, 4 November)
- Re: [w3c/screen-orientation] Add [SameObject] to the `Screen.orientation` attribute (#111) (Saturday, 4 November)
- Re: [w3c/screen-orientation] Clean-up anchors and definitions (#109) (Thursday, 2 November)
- Re: [w3c/screen-orientation] Fix all ReSpec warnings (#108) (Thursday, 2 November)
- Re: [w3c/screen-orientation] Fix all ReSpec warnings (#108) (Wednesday, 1 November)
- Re: [w3c/screen-orientation] Fix all ReSpec warnings (#108) (Wednesday, 1 November)
Mardav Wala
Marijn Kruisselbrink
- Re: [w3c/FileAPI] Document BlobPropertyBag "endings", or keep pushing to remove? (#46) (Thursday, 30 November)
- Re: [w3c/FileAPI] Add BlobPropertyBag.endings back to the spec. (#90) (Thursday, 30 November)
- Re: [w3c/FileAPI] Add BlobPropertyBag.endings back to the spec. (#90) (Thursday, 30 November)
- Re: [w3c/FileAPI] Add BlobPropertyBag.endings back to the spec. (#90) (Thursday, 30 November)
- Re: [w3c/FileAPI] Add BlobPropertyBag.endings back to the spec. (#90) (Wednesday, 29 November)
- Re: [w3c/FileAPI] Add BlobPropertyBag.endings back to the spec. (#90) (Wednesday, 29 November)
- Re: [w3c/FileAPI] Add BlobPropertyBag.endings back to the spec. (#90) (Wednesday, 29 November)
- Re: [w3c/FileAPI] Add BlobPropertyBag.endings back to the spec. (#90) (Wednesday, 29 November)
- Re: [w3c/FileAPI] Add BlobPropertyBag.endings back to the spec. (#90) (Wednesday, 29 November)
- [w3c/FileAPI] Add BlobPropertyBag.endings back to the spec. (#90) (Wednesday, 29 November)
- Re: [w3c/FileAPI] Implementations allow all values in type getter (#43) (Wednesday, 29 November)
- [w3c/ServiceWorker] Delete foreign_fetch_explainer.md (#1236) (Tuesday, 28 November)
- Re: [w3c/FileAPI] Implementations allow all values in type getter (#43) (Tuesday, 28 November)
- Re: [w3c/FileAPI] Clarify Lifetime of BlobStore (#89) (Tuesday, 28 November)
- Re: [w3c/FileAPI] Clarify Lifetime of BlobStore (#89) (Tuesday, 28 November)
- Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Run Job does not specify which event loop to queue its tasks on (#1224) (Tuesday, 14 November)
- Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Why is the scope to registration map and ordered map? (#1225) (Tuesday, 14 November)
- [w3c/ServiceWorker] Run Job does not specify which event loop to queue its tasks on (#1224) (Tuesday, 14 November)
- Re: [w3c/FileAPI] Clarify Lifetime of BlobStore (#89) (Monday, 13 November)
- Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Provide a way to ask the waiting Service Worker to skip waiting from the outside (#1223) (Monday, 13 November)
- Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Provide a way to ask the waiting Service Worker to skip waiting from the outside (#1223) (Monday, 13 November)
- Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Define procedure to convert options object of `sw.register()` to `Link` header (#979) (Friday, 3 November)
Mark Nottingham
Markus Ast
Masayuki Nakano
Matt Falkenhagen
- Re: [whatwg/fetch] consider failing same-origin fetch requests that get a cross-origin cors Response synthesized by a service worker (#629) (Thursday, 30 November)
- Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] What happens to the request body if the fetch isn't handled? (#1191) (Monday, 20 November)
- Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] Should we specify behavior for using objects from detached contexts? (#1221) (Thursday, 9 November)
- Re: [whatwg/fetch] Request body streams that cannot be retried (#538) (Thursday, 9 November)
- [w3c/ServiceWorker] Should we specify behavior for using objects from detached contexts? (#1221) (Wednesday, 8 November)
- Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] is the browser required to start the ServiceWorker for postMessage() if there is no message event handler? (#1200) (Tuesday, 7 November)
- Re: [whatwg/fetch] Request body streams that cannot be retried (#538) (Tuesday, 7 November)
- Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] resurrected service workers don't fire an activate event which may break expectations (#1204) (Tuesday, 7 November)
- Re: [whatwg/fetch] Use the URL from the response, if it has one (#146) (Thursday, 2 November)
Matt Giuca
Matthew Dean
Matthew Phillips
Max Nordlund
MeritBased
Michael Stramel
Michael[tm] Smith
Mictronics
Mike
Mike Frysinger
Mike Taylor
Mike West
- Re: [whatwg/fetch] Update Fetch to support Token Binding. (#325) (Thursday, 30 November)
- Re: [whatwg/fetch] "3.3.1. ..." Allow on empty content-type (#636) (Thursday, 23 November)
- Re: [w3c/ServiceWorker] consider exposing credentials.get() but only when mediation is set to "silent" (#1231) (Wednesday, 22 November)
- Re: [whatwg/storage] Bucket hooks (#18) (Tuesday, 21 November)
- Re: [whatwg/fetch] Document CORS safelist exceptions (#621) (Monday, 20 November)
- Re: [whatwg/fetch] Document CORS safelist exceptions (#621) (Monday, 13 November)
- Re: [whatwg/fetch] Document CORS safelist exceptions (#621) (Monday, 13 November)
- Re: [whatwg/fetch] Document CORS safelist exceptions (#621) (Monday, 6 November)
- Re: [whatwg/fetch] Expose Content-Length header in CORS requests (#622) (Friday, 3 November)
- Re: [heycam/webidl] Add [InsecureContext] (#471) (Thursday, 2 November)
Mikhail Pozdnyakov
Moonchild
Morgan Conrad
Mounir Lamouri
- Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Modeling media auto-playing as a permission? (#203) (Wednesday, 29 November)
- Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Modeling media auto-playing as a permission? (#203) (Wednesday, 22 November)
- Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Modeling media auto-playing as a permission? (#203) (Thursday, 16 November)
- Re: [w3c/screen-orientation] Wide review tracker (#102) (Friday, 10 November)
- Re: [w3c/screen-orientation] Fix event firing (#112) (Friday, 3 November)
- Re: [w3c/screen-orientation] Event firing needs fixes (#93) (Friday, 3 November)
- Re: [w3c/screen-orientation] Fix event firing (#112) (Friday, 3 November)
- Re: [w3c/screen-orientation] Add [SameObject] to the `Screen.orientation` attribute (#111) (Thursday, 2 November)
- Re: [w3c/screen-orientation] Fix all ReSpec warnings (#108) (Wednesday, 1 November)
- Re: [w3c/screen-orientation] Fix all ReSpec warnings (#108) (Wednesday, 1 November)
- Re: [w3c/screen-orientation] Fix all ReSpec warnings (#108) (Wednesday, 1 November)
- Re: [w3c/screen-orientation] Fix all ReSpec warnings (#108) (Wednesday, 1 November)
- Re: [w3c/screen-orientation] Fix all ReSpec warnings (#108) (Wednesday, 1 November)
- Re: [w3c/screen-orientation] Fix all ReSpec warnings (#108) (Wednesday, 1 November)
Nigel Megitt
Nolan Lawson
nondebug
Pat Mächler
patrick kettner
Paul Mason
Pedram Emrouznejad
Peter Linss
Philip Jägenstedt
- Re: [whatwg/encoding] Need more changes for common deploy (#126) (Monday, 27 November)
- Re: [whatwg/encoding] Need more changes for common deploy (#126) (Monday, 27 November)
- Re: [whatwg/fullscreen] Add pointer to HTML about top layer and inertness (#15) (Thursday, 23 November)
- Re: [whatwg/streams] Branch snapshot missing for algorithm-slots branch (#858) (Friday, 17 November)
- Re: [w3ctag/design-reviews] Modeling media auto-playing as a permission? (#203) (Wednesday, 15 November)
- Re: [heycam/webidl] Proposed solution to make grammar changes less disruptive (#477) (Tuesday, 14 November)
- Re: [w3c/permissions] Introduce "Automation" section (#151) (Monday, 13 November)
- Re: [w3c/permissions] Introduce "Automation" section (#151) (Sunday, 12 November)
- Re: [whatwg/url] Meta: use the common deploy.sh (#351) (Saturday, 4 November)
- Re: [whatwg/url] Meta: use the common deploy.sh (#351) (Saturday, 4 November)
- Re: [w3c/permissions] Introduce "Automation" section (#151) (Saturday, 4 November)
- Re: [w3c/DOM-Parsing] Ask for tests for normative changes in CONTRIBUTING.md (#32) (Friday, 3 November)
- Re: [whatwg/streams] Meta: use the common deploy.sh (with POST_BUILD_STEP) (#849) (Thursday, 2 November)
- Re: [whatwg/streams] Meta: use the common deploy.sh (with POST_BUILD_STEP) (#849) (Thursday, 2 November)
- Re: [whatwg/streams] Meta: use the common deploy.sh (with POST_BUILD_STEP) (#849) (Thursday, 2 November)
Philippe Le Hegaret
Philippe Ombredanne
Photopea
Przemysław Adamczewski
RakeshLchanSarma
rektide
Rick Byers
Rob Dodson
Ryosuke Niwa
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Highlight code blocks, fix emphasis (#712) (Tuesday, 21 November)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Highlight code blocks, fix emphasis (#712) (Tuesday, 21 November)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Selection APIs for Shadow DOM (#79) (Wednesday, 15 November)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] [template] How to remove a listener registered on createCallback (#708) (Tuesday, 14 November)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Selection APIs for Shadow DOM (#79) (Tuesday, 14 November)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Agenda for W3C TPAC 2017 (Web Components) (#641) (Tuesday, 14 November)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Agenda for W3C TPAC 2017 (Web Components) (#641) (Tuesday, 14 November)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] [templates] If HTML Template Instantiation proposal is adopted, consider a HTML-native syntax (#695) (Tuesday, 14 November)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Add `customElements.upgrade` (#710) (Tuesday, 14 November)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] [template]How to remove a listener registered on createCallback (#708) (Tuesday, 14 November)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Fix an arguments order of replaceChild (#706) (Tuesday, 14 November)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] typo (#707) (Tuesday, 14 November)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] [template] What if the `type` attribute is specified in the <template> but its processor is not registered? (#709) (Tuesday, 14 November)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Add `customElements.upgrade` (#710) (Monday, 13 November)
- [w3c/webcomponents] Add `customElements.upgrade` (#710) (Monday, 13 November)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Add a missing parenthesis (#698) (Monday, 6 November)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Fix some typos, missing formating and erroneous Markdown in Template-Instantiation.md (#699) (Monday, 6 November)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Fix some typos, missing formating and erroneous Markdown in Template-Instantiation.md (#699) (Monday, 6 November)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] [templates] Do not specify template binding syntax in spec, make configurable (#697) (Monday, 6 November)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] [templates] How featureful should the default processor be? (#682) (Saturday, 4 November)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] [templates] Is a global registry of template processors the right idea? (#681) (Saturday, 4 November)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Replace Em dash with hyphen minus (#696) (Saturday, 4 November)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] MutationObserver needs an equivalent of disconnected & connected callbacks (#533) (Saturday, 4 November)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] MutationObserver needs an equivalent of disconnected & connected callbacks (#533) (Saturday, 4 November)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Disconnected Events (#678) (Saturday, 4 November)
- [whatwg/dom] MutationObserver needs an equivalent of disconnected & connected callbacks (#533) (Saturday, 4 November)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] [templates] How featureful should the default processor be? (#682) (Saturday, 4 November)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] [templates] How featureful should the default processor be? (#682) (Saturday, 4 November)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] [templates] Maybe each {{ ~ }} should be its own text node? (#683) (Saturday, 4 November)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] [templates] How featureful should the default processor be? (#682) (Saturday, 4 November)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] [templates] How featureful should the default processor be? (#682) (Saturday, 4 November)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] [templates] Maybe each {{ ~ }} should be its own text node? (#683) (Saturday, 4 November)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Disconnected Events (#678) (Friday, 3 November)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] [templates] Consider ${foo} instead of {{foo}} (#688) (Friday, 3 November)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Custom attribute names conflicting with built-in attribute names (#654) (Friday, 3 November)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Disconnected Events (#678) (Friday, 3 November)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] [templates] Consider ${foo} instead of {{foo}} (#688) (Friday, 3 November)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Custom attribute names conflicting with built-in attribute names (#654) (Friday, 3 November)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Fix template instantiation examples (#694) (Thursday, 2 November)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] [templates] What is declareCallback? (#693) (Thursday, 2 November)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] [templates] Consider ${foo} instead of {{foo}} (#688) (Thursday, 2 November)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] [templates] Unclear usage of markdown-like syntax in state object (#689) (Thursday, 2 November)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] [templates] Unclear usage of markdown-like syntax in state object (#689) (Thursday, 2 November)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Copy edits for all remaining parts (#687) (Thursday, 2 November)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Copy edits for all remaining parts (#687) (Thursday, 2 November)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Copy edits for all remaining parts (#687) (Thursday, 2 November)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Copy edits for all remaining parts (#687) (Thursday, 2 November)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Copy edits for all remaining parts (#687) (Thursday, 2 November)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Fix Markdown styles of Template-Instantiation (#691) (Thursday, 2 November)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Fix Handlebars typos (#692) (Thursday, 2 November)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] [templates] Unclear usage of markdown-like syntax in state object (#689) (Thursday, 2 November)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Disconnected Events (#678) (Thursday, 2 November)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] [templates] Maybe each {{ ~ }} should be its own text node? (#683) (Thursday, 2 November)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] [templates] Maybe each {{ ~ }} should be its own text node? (#683) (Thursday, 2 November)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] [templates] Maybe each {{ ~ }} should be its own text node? (#683) (Thursday, 2 November)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] [templates] Maybe each {{ ~ }} should be its own text node? (#683) (Thursday, 2 November)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Copy edits to sections 3.1 and 3.2 (#686) (Thursday, 2 November)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] [templates] Maybe each {{ ~ }} should be its own text node? (#683) (Thursday, 2 November)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] [templates] Maybe each {{ ~ }} should be its own text node? (#683) (Thursday, 2 November)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] [templates] API for updating (#685) (Thursday, 2 November)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] [templates] No need for -Callback suffix (#684) (Thursday, 2 November)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] [templates] Maybe each {{ ~ }} should be its own text node? (#683) (Thursday, 2 November)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] [templates] How featureful should the default processor be? (#682) (Thursday, 2 November)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] [templates] Is a global registry of template processors the right idea? (#681) (Thursday, 2 November)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] [templates] Parts APIs surface concerns (#680) (Thursday, 2 November)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Copy-edits to Use Cases & Background sections (#679) (Thursday, 2 November)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Agenda for W3C TPAC 2017 (Web Components) (#641) (Thursday, 2 November)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] event.composedPath() may return different results if DOM is modified between two calls (#525) (Wednesday, 1 November)
Sahel Sharify
Salvador de la Puente González
Sean D
Shiino Yuki
Simon Stewart
sleevi
smaug----
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Selection APIs for Shadow DOM (#79) (Tuesday, 14 November)
- [w3c/webcomponents] [templates] Ensure that template instantiation actually improves the platform (#704) (Friday, 10 November)
- [w3c/webcomponents] [templates] implement a polyfill of template-instantiation before even considering to add the API natively to the platform (#702) (Friday, 10 November)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] event.composedPath() may return different results if DOM is modified between two calls (#525) (Thursday, 9 November)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] event.composedPath() may return different results if DOM is modified between two calls (#525) (Thursday, 9 November)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] event.composedPath() may return different results if DOM is modified between two calls (#525) (Wednesday, 8 November)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] event.composedPath() may return different results if DOM is modified between two calls (#525) (Wednesday, 8 November)
- Re: [w3c/WebPlatformWG] TPAC agenda: Tue Nov 7 (Editing TF) (#93) (Tuesday, 7 November)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] MutationObserver needs an equivalent of disconnected & connected callbacks (#533) (Sunday, 5 November)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Agenda for W3C TPAC 2017 (Web Components) (#641) (Saturday, 4 November)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] MutationObserver needs an equivalent of disconnected & connected callbacks (#533) (Saturday, 4 November)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Agenda for W3C TPAC 2017 (Web Components) (#641) (Thursday, 2 November)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] "node's tree" seems to be an undefined concept (#526) (Wednesday, 1 November)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] event.composedPath() may return different results if DOM is modified between two calls (#525) (Wednesday, 1 November)
Snazzypeanuts
snuggs
staktrace
Stephan Schneider
Tab Atkins Jr.
Takayoshi Kochi
Takeshi Yoshino
Tantek Çelik
Ted Mielczarek
Tejas Kumar
- Re: [whatwg/streams] Remove transform streams tests as they are now upstream (#854) (Sunday, 12 November)
- Re: [whatwg/fetch] Reject Promise on Error Response (#627) (Tuesday, 7 November)
- Re: [whatwg/fetch] Reject Promise on Error Response (#627) (Tuesday, 7 November)
- Re: [whatwg/fetch] Reject Promise on Error Response (#627) (Tuesday, 7 November)
- Re: [whatwg/fetch] Reject Promise on Error Response (#627) (Tuesday, 7 November)
- Re: [whatwg/fetch] Reject Promise on Error Response (#627) (Tuesday, 7 November)
- [whatwg/fetch] Reject promise on Error Response (#627) (Tuesday, 7 November)
- Re: [whatwg/streams] Add examples by @TejasQ (f29508c) (Monday, 6 November)
- Re: [whatwg/fetch] Expose Content-Length header in CORS requests (#622) (Friday, 3 November)
- Re: [whatwg/streams] Added a couple of examples (#853) (Thursday, 2 November)
- [whatwg/streams] Added a couple of examples (#853) (Thursday, 2 November)
- Re: [whatwg/streams] Standard text for TransformStream (#811) (Thursday, 2 November)
- Re: [whatwg/streams] Standard text for TransformStream (#811) (Thursday, 2 November)
- Re: [whatwg/streams] Standard text for TransformStream (#811) (Thursday, 2 November)
Thomas Steiner
Till Schneidereit
Tim van der Lippe
Timo Tijhof
Timothy Gu
Tobie Langel
- Re: [heycam/webidl] Amirhosein (#481) (Saturday, 25 November)
- Re: [heycam/webidl] Active (#480) (Saturday, 25 November)
- Re: [heycam/webidl] Some means to signal that a method requires user action to be called (#479) (Thursday, 23 November)
- Re: [heycam/webidl] Some means to signal that a method requires user action to be called (#479) (Thursday, 23 November)
- Re: [heycam/webidl] Some means to signal that a method requires user action to be called (#479) (Thursday, 23 November)
- Re: [heycam/webidl] [spam] (#478) (Saturday, 18 November)
- Re: [whatwg/streams] Branch snapshot missing for algorithm-slots branch (#858) (Friday, 17 November)
- Re: [whatwg/streams] Branch snapshot missing for algorithm-slots branch (#858) (Friday, 17 November)
- Re: [heycam/webidl] Make [Exposed] mandatory, remove [PrimaryGlobal] (#423) (Wednesday, 15 November)
- Re: [heycam/webidl] Proposed solution to make grammar changes less disruptive (#477) (Wednesday, 15 November)
- [heycam/webidl] Proposed solution to make grammar changes less disruptive (#477) (Monday, 13 November)
- Re: [heycam/webidl] Various named property stuff seems confused in the face of symbols (#175) (Monday, 13 November)
- Re: [heycam/webidl] Replace remaining emu-t.symbol (#475) (Monday, 6 November)
- Re: [heycam/webidl] static/stringifer RegularOperation (#474) (Monday, 6 November)
- Re: [heycam/webidl] Order of includes statements is not a well-defined concept (#473) (Friday, 3 November)
- Re: [heycam/webidl] Can SpecialOperation be more simplified? (#470) (Friday, 3 November)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] Use mixins in IDL definitions (#529) (Friday, 3 November)
- [whatwg/storage] Update WebIDL definition(s) to use new mixin syntax (#53) (Friday, 3 November)
- [whatwg/fetch] Update WebIDL definition(s) to use new mixin syntax (#624) (Friday, 3 November)
- [whatwg/dom] Update WebIDL definition(s) to use new mixin syntax (#532) (Friday, 3 November)
- Re: [heycam/webidl] Track PR #433 (#472) (Friday, 3 November)
- [heycam/webidl] Track PR #433 (#472) (Friday, 3 November)
- Re: [whatwg/dom] Use mixins in IDL definitions (#529) (Friday, 3 November)
- Re: [heycam/webidl] Add [InsecureContext] (#471) (Thursday, 2 November)
Tomek Wytrębowicz
Tomoyuki Shimizu
Toni-Jan Keith Monserrat
Toru Kobayashi
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] [template] How to remove a listener registered on createCallback (#708) (Tuesday, 14 November)
- [w3c/webcomponents] [template]How to remove a listener registered on createCallback (#708) (Monday, 13 November)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Fix an arguments order of replaceChild (#706) (Monday, 13 November)
- [w3c/webcomponents] Fix an arguments order of replaceChild (#706) (Monday, 13 November)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Add a missing parenthesis (#698) (Monday, 6 November)
- [w3c/webcomponents] Add a missing parenthesis (#698) (Monday, 6 November)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Replace Em dash with hyphen minus (#696) (Sunday, 5 November)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Replace Em dash with hyphen minus (#696) (Saturday, 4 November)
- [w3c/webcomponents] Replace Em dash with hyphen minus (#696) (Saturday, 4 November)
- Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Fix Markdown styles of Template-Instantiation (#691) (Thursday, 2 November)
- [w3c/webcomponents] Fix Markdown styles of Template-Instantiation (#691) (Thursday, 2 November)
Travis Leithead
Trey Shugart
triple-underscore
vanupam
Victor Costan
victoriasu
Vincent Scheib
Vitaly Dmitriev
Walle Cyril
Wired Earp
wuyandefeixue
Xiaocheng Hu
Xiaoqian Wu
xtofian
Yoichi Osato
Yutaka Hirano
- Re: [whatwg/fetch] More eargerly send RST_STREAM on redirects (#638) (Sunday, 26 November)
- Re: [whatwg/fetch] Clarify semantics of checking done, closed, etc. states of a null body stream (#635) (Friday, 24 November)
- Re: [whatwg/fetch] Clarify semantics of checking done, closed, etc. states of a null body stream (#635) (Friday, 24 November)
- Re: [whatwg/fetch] Clarify semantics of checking done, closed, etc. states of a null body stream (#635) (Friday, 24 November)
- Re: [whatwg/fetch] Clarify semantics of checking done, closed, etc. states of a null body stream (#635) (Tuesday, 21 November)
- Re: [whatwg/fetch] Clarify semantics of checking done, closed, etc. states of a null body stream (#635) (Tuesday, 21 November)
- Re: [whatwg/fetch] Clarify semantics of checking done, closed, etc. states of a null body stream (#635) (Tuesday, 21 November)
- Re: [whatwg/url] Should URLSearchParams stringify be called in URL constructor? (#350) (Wednesday, 1 November)
Yves Lafon
王镇
Last message date: Thursday, 30 November 2017 22:56:57 UTC