- From: ddorwin <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Thu, 02 Nov 2017 18:52:37 +0000 (UTC)
- To: heycam/webidl <webidl@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Thursday, 2 November 2017 18:53:00 UTC
To make it clear which (new) APIs are available on insecure contexts and encourage spec authors to make a conscious decision, I propose adding `[InsecureContext]` as a peer to `[SecureContext]`. Such an attribute would also enable tools, such as Bikeshed and IDL compilers, to ensure that one or the other has been specified. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/heycam/webidl/issues/471
Received on Thursday, 2 November 2017 18:53:00 UTC