- From: Jake Archibald <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Wed, 08 Nov 2017 13:25:53 +0000 (UTC)
- To: w3c/ServiceWorker <ServiceWorker@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Wednesday, 8 November 2017 13:26:15 UTC
Unregistering on 410 is fine, but is it useful? It doesn't fall with the "I removed the service worker and forgot about it" case. If you can put the effort into serving a 410, you can just create a service worker that unregisters itself. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/w3c/ServiceWorker/issues/204#issuecomment-342816552
Received on Wednesday, 8 November 2017 13:26:15 UTC