Re: [whatwg/fetch] "3.3.1. ..." Allow on empty content-type (#636)

Maybe you're tripping over semantics here. with "file name" I meant the extension visible in a URL -- and it was an example indicating that apart from sniffing, a client can determine/guess the content type in other ways when not being specified with a header.

I'm not going to spend much more time on this issue, though, I have better things to do -- My point remains that the spec could be clarified and made completely unambiguous with a one-line change. Ultimately, it's the editor's choice to do or not do this.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/whatwg/fetch/issues/636#issuecomment-346550307