- From: Joshua Bell <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2017 19:45:08 +0000 (UTC)
- To: w3c/FileAPI <FileAPI@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
- Message-ID: <w3c/FileAPI/pull/90/review/79958983@github.com>
inexorabletash commented on this pull request. > @@ -230,8 +231,11 @@ interface Blob { optional DOMString contentType); }; +enum EndingTypes {"transparent", "native"}; nit: whitespace inside { } (from a survey of other specs) > <dt id="dfn-BlobPropertyBagMembers">An *optional* {{BlobPropertyBag}} - <dd>which takes one member: + <dd>which takes two members: Maybe "these optional members" ? > </dl> +<div algorithm="process-blob-parts"> +To <dfn lt="process blob parts|processing blob parts">process blob parts</dfn> given a sequence of {{BlobPart}}'s |parts| +and {{BlobPropertyBag}} |options|, +run the following steps: + +1. Let |bytes| be an empty sequence of bytes. + +1. For each |element| in |parts|: + + 1. If |element| is a {{USVString}}, run the following substeps: + + 1. Let |s| be |element|. + + 1. If the {{BlobPropertyBag/endings}} member of |options| is set to {{"native"}}, nit: I think "set" is a verb in spec language, so "is set to" is used during initialization, not testing. Could just be `|options| is {{"native"}}` here. > + + Note: The {{Blob/type}} of the {{Blob}} array element is ignored and will not affect {{Blob/type}} of returned + {{Blob}} object. + +1. Return |bytes|. + +</div> + +<div algorithm="convert-line-endings-to-native"> +To <dfn lt="convert line endings to native|converting line endings to native"> +convert line endings to native</dfn> in a [=string=] |s|, +run the following steps: + +1. Let |native line ending| be be the [=code point=] U+000A LF. + +1. If it matches the underlying platform's conventions, "it" reads ambiguously here in English (in a naive reading it refers to the previous step's context) Better would be something phrased as: "If the underlying platform's conventions are ... then ... " (And the clause might be "to represent newlines as a carriage return and line feed sequence" but I'm more concerned about the sentence structure) > + {{Blob}} object. + +1. Return |bytes|. + +</div> + +<div algorithm="convert-line-endings-to-native"> +To <dfn lt="convert line endings to native|converting line endings to native"> +convert line endings to native</dfn> in a [=string=] |s|, +run the following steps: + +1. Let |native line ending| be be the [=code point=] U+000A LF. + +1. If it matches the underlying platform's conventions, + set |native line ending| to the [=code point=] U+000D CR + followed by the [=code point=] U+000A. nit: Previous line has `U+000D CR` but this line has only `U+000A` https://infra.spec.whatwg.org/#code-points says to use the name when it's not printable. Super nitpicky: per http://www.unicode.org/charts/PDF/U0000.pdf it would be **U+000D CARRIAGE RETURN (CR)** and **U+000A LINE FEED (LF)** although Infra itself just uses LF > + followed by the [=code point=] U+000A. + +1. Set |result| to the empty [=string=]. + +1. Let |position| be a [=position variable=] for |s|, + initially pointing at the start of |s|. + +1. Let |token| be the result of [=collecting a sequence of code points=] + that are not equal to U+000A LF or U+000D CR + from |s| given |position|. + +1. Append |token| to |result|. + +1. While |position| is not past the end of |s|: + + 1. If the [=code point=] at |position| within |s| equals U+000D CR: Subsequent steps would be simpler if you assign a local variable (e.g. _cp_) to _code point at position within s_ > + +1. Append |token| to |result|. + +1. While |position| is not past the end of |s|: + + 1. If the [=code point=] at |position| within |s| equals U+000D CR: + + 1. Append |native line ending| to |result|. + + 1. Advance |position| by 1. + + 1. If |position| is not past the end of |s| + and the [=code point=] at |position| within |s| equals U+000A LF + advance |position| by 1. + + 1. If the [=code point=] at |position| within |s| equals U+000A LF, Needs an "Otherwise" (or to handle position being past the end) -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/w3c/FileAPI/pull/90#pullrequestreview-79958983
Received on Wednesday, 29 November 2017 19:45:33 UTC