- From: Jungkee Song <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Fri, 17 Nov 2017 03:06:58 +0000 (UTC)
- To: w3c/ServiceWorker <ServiceWorker@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
- Message-ID: <w3c/ServiceWorker/issues/1228/345132444@github.com>
> When should the initial about:blank conceptually exist? The initial about:blank in the spec is created when a browsing context is created as you pointed. This applies to any browsing contexts: top-level, nested, and auxiliary. For top-level navigations within the same browsing context, the initial about:blank client is always replaced by a reserved client (which we decided to not expose to script) as they have different origins. > It seems this means we should always have an active about:blank document when performing a navigation FetchEvent? Is this right? For the initial navigation, I think that's true. For an iframe and auxiliary window with the same origin to the parent frame, the active about:blank document should be the landing client. For the top-level browsing context, that'd be replaced by a new landing client. > Or is there something in the spec which implies we should create a separate reserved Client for things like top level navigations? The [environment](https://html.spec.whatwg.org/#environment) created in https://html.spec.whatwg.org/#process-a-navigate-fetch step 4 is the reserved client for a navigation request. The environment itself should not be exposed to script as we decided, but `fetchEvent.resultingClientId` should convey either this environment's id or the initial about:blank client's id depending on the cases. I'm planning to spec that in Handle Fetch. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/w3c/ServiceWorker/issues/1228#issuecomment-345132444
Received on Friday, 17 November 2017 03:07:21 UTC