- From: Anne van Kesteren <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2017 15:45:07 +0000 (UTC)
- To: w3c/FileAPI <FileAPI@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Tuesday, 28 November 2017 15:45:44 UTC
Using the empty string (which indicates a missing MIME type) is fine. I didn't mean to suggest changing that (if someone wants to suggest that anyway, let's do that in a separate issue). I think if we parse and then serialize we create less trouble for downstream consumers of these objects (e.g., consumers who might have parsers that could easily be broken by malicious input). And these objects would then also offer a consistent API with when the browser is responsible for generating them as the MIME type would always be valid. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/w3c/FileAPI/issues/43#issuecomment-347565028
Received on Tuesday, 28 November 2017 15:45:44 UTC