- From: Marcos Cáceres <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2017 02:47:45 +0000 (UTC)
- To: heycam/webidl <webidl@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Tuesday, 14 November 2017 02:48:08 UTC
> I don't think this is a good idea. We need to be able to evolve Web IDL without the burden of old syntax, and we need to be able to push the ecosystem forward as fast as we did with serializers. I agree. Just need to keep communicating breaking changes upstream by filing bugs on the various tools (as has been done quite effectively lately, so huge thanks to everyone doing that! ❤️). > If some specs are having trouble, then I think this should be solved at a tooling level, not a spec level. Agree. We can definitely work on supporting a compat mode on the webidl2.js side. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/heycam/webidl/issues/477#issuecomment-344129214
Received on Tuesday, 14 November 2017 02:48:08 UTC