Re: [w3c/webcomponents] Copy edits for all remaining parts (#687)

rniwa commented on this pull request.



>  
-There is an alternative approach for (9), which is to make TemplatePart constructible from template process callback themselves. However, this approach involves the template process callback cloning template parts along with other nodes, or let author scripts manually specify to which element each template part belongs. This quickly becomes an entangled mess because now we could have multiple template parts that refer to a single DOM location or an attribute, and we have to start dealing with multiple template parts trying to override one another even though there is no good use case for such a behavior.
-
-We like the idea of supporting very basic control flow such as `if` and `foreach` in the default template process callback but we don't think it's a show stopper if the default template process callback didn't support them in the initial cut.
-
+We like the idea of supporting very a basic control flow such as `if` and `foreach` in the default template process callback, but we don't think it'd be a show stopper if the default template process callback didn't support them in the initial cut.

This should have said "supporting very basic control flow statements".

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3c/webcomponents/pull/687#pullrequestreview-73946758