- From: Marcos Cáceres <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Thu, 02 Nov 2017 09:01:54 +0000 (UTC)
- To: w3c/screen-orientation <screen-orientation@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
- Message-ID: <w3c/screen-orientation/pull/109/review/73716488@github.com>
marcoscaceres requested changes on this pull request.
Nearly there!
> @@ -131,12 +131,12 @@
task</a></dfn>
</li>
<li>
- <code><dfn><a href=
- 'https://html.spec.whatwg.org/multipage/browsers.html#window'>Window</a></dfn></code>
+ <dfn><a href=
We need to update these (I mislead you a bit, here is ok to use code, then ReSpec automatically "codes" any `a` that xref this)... we can do these separately tho unless you feel like doing them now.
```HTML
<code><dfn data-cite="!HTML/multipage/browsers.html#window">Window</dfn></code>
```
See: https://github.com/w3c/respec/wiki/data--cite
> @@ -231,45 +231,44 @@
};
</pre>
<p>
- When the <code><dfn for='ScreenOrientation'>lock</dfn>()</code>
- method is invoked, the <a>user agent</a> MUST run the <a>apply an
- orientation lock</a> steps to the <a>responsible document</a> using
+ When the <dfn>lock</dfn>() method is invoked,
Nit: we now support `<dfn>lock()</dfn>` (i.e., parens inside)
> @@ -212,13 +212,13 @@
};
</pre>
<p>
- The <code><dfn for='Screen'>orientation</dfn></code> object is an
+ The <dfn for='Screen'>orientation</dfn> object is an
Nit: for attribute is not supported.
> <var>orientation</var>.
</p>
<p>
- When the <code><dfn for='ScreenOrientation'>unlock</dfn>()</code>
- method is invoked, the <a>user agent</a> MUST run the steps to
- <a>lock the orientation</a> of the <a>responsible document</a> to the
+ When the <dfn>unlock</dfn>() method is
as above.
> </p>
<p>
- The <code><dfn for='ScreenOrientation'>onchange</dfn></code>
- attribute is an <a>event handler</a> whose corresponding <a>event
- handler event type</a> is <code>change</code>.
+ The <dfn>onchange</dfn> attribute is an
+ <a>event handler</a> whose corresponding <a>event handler event type</a>
+ is <code>change</code>.
we should probably write `<code>"change"</code>`... if we defined "change", we should probably link to it... can't remember tho.
> </p>
<p>
- The <code><dfn for='ScreenOrientation'>onchange</dfn></code>
- attribute is an <a>event handler</a> whose corresponding <a>event
- handler event type</a> is <code>change</code>.
+ The <dfn>onchange</dfn> attribute is an
+ <a>event handler</a> whose corresponding <a>event handler event type</a>
+ is <code>change</code>.
</p>
</section>
<section>
Please add `data-link-for="OrientationType" data-dfn-for="OrientationType"` attributes to this section.
> @@ -355,15 +354,13 @@
<ol>
<li>If the screen width is greater than the screen height, set the
<a>document</a>'s <a>current orientation type</a> to
- <code><dfn for='OrientationType'>landscape-primary</dfn></code>
- or <code><dfn for=
- 'OrientationType'>landscape-secondary</dfn></code>.
+ <dfn data-dfn-for='OrientationType'>landscape-primary</dfn> or
Let's move the `data-dfn-for='OrientationType'` to the `section` element, then it will just work with `<dfn>`
> @@ -463,20 +460,20 @@
<li>Depending on <var>orientation</var> value, do the following:
<dl>
<dt>
- <code><dfn for=
- 'OrientationLockType'>portrait-primary</dfn></code> or
- <code><dfn for=
- 'OrientationLockType'>portrait-secondary</dfn></code> or
- <code><dfn for=
- 'OrientationLockType'>landscape-primary</dfn></code> or
- <code><dfn for=
- 'OrientationLockType'>landscape-secondary</dfn></code>
+ <dfn data-dfn-for=
as above... then you don't need `data-dfn-for` here... ReSpec always looks for the nearest section with "data-dfn-for=".
> @@ -702,9 +698,9 @@
</li>
<li>If the orientation change was triggered by a user gesture
such as the user turning the device, as opposed to a call to
- <a data-link-for='ScreenOrientation'>lock</a>, the <a>task</a>
- MUST be annotated with <code>process user orientation change
- </code> when running the next step.
+ <a>lock</a>, the <a>task</a> MUST be annotated with
+ <code>process user orientation change</code> when running the
Nit: this `code` should probably have been an `<a>`
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/w3c/screen-orientation/pull/109#pullrequestreview-73716488
Received on Thursday, 2 November 2017 09:02:21 UTC