- From: Marcos Cáceres <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Thu, 02 Nov 2017 09:01:54 +0000 (UTC)
- To: w3c/screen-orientation <screen-orientation@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
- Message-ID: <w3c/screen-orientation/pull/109/review/73716488@github.com>
marcoscaceres requested changes on this pull request. Nearly there! > @@ -131,12 +131,12 @@ task</a></dfn> </li> <li> - <code><dfn><a href= - 'https://html.spec.whatwg.org/multipage/browsers.html#window'>Window</a></dfn></code> + <dfn><a href= We need to update these (I mislead you a bit, here is ok to use code, then ReSpec automatically "codes" any `a` that xref this)... we can do these separately tho unless you feel like doing them now. ```HTML <code><dfn data-cite="!HTML/multipage/browsers.html#window">Window</dfn></code> ``` See: https://github.com/w3c/respec/wiki/data--cite > @@ -231,45 +231,44 @@ }; </pre> <p> - When the <code><dfn for='ScreenOrientation'>lock</dfn>()</code> - method is invoked, the <a>user agent</a> MUST run the <a>apply an - orientation lock</a> steps to the <a>responsible document</a> using + When the <dfn>lock</dfn>() method is invoked, Nit: we now support `<dfn>lock()</dfn>` (i.e., parens inside) > @@ -212,13 +212,13 @@ }; </pre> <p> - The <code><dfn for='Screen'>orientation</dfn></code> object is an + The <dfn for='Screen'>orientation</dfn> object is an Nit: for attribute is not supported. > <var>orientation</var>. </p> <p> - When the <code><dfn for='ScreenOrientation'>unlock</dfn>()</code> - method is invoked, the <a>user agent</a> MUST run the steps to - <a>lock the orientation</a> of the <a>responsible document</a> to the + When the <dfn>unlock</dfn>() method is as above. > </p> <p> - The <code><dfn for='ScreenOrientation'>onchange</dfn></code> - attribute is an <a>event handler</a> whose corresponding <a>event - handler event type</a> is <code>change</code>. + The <dfn>onchange</dfn> attribute is an + <a>event handler</a> whose corresponding <a>event handler event type</a> + is <code>change</code>. we should probably write `<code>"change"</code>`... if we defined "change", we should probably link to it... can't remember tho. > </p> <p> - The <code><dfn for='ScreenOrientation'>onchange</dfn></code> - attribute is an <a>event handler</a> whose corresponding <a>event - handler event type</a> is <code>change</code>. + The <dfn>onchange</dfn> attribute is an + <a>event handler</a> whose corresponding <a>event handler event type</a> + is <code>change</code>. </p> </section> <section> Please add `data-link-for="OrientationType" data-dfn-for="OrientationType"` attributes to this section. > @@ -355,15 +354,13 @@ <ol> <li>If the screen width is greater than the screen height, set the <a>document</a>'s <a>current orientation type</a> to - <code><dfn for='OrientationType'>landscape-primary</dfn></code> - or <code><dfn for= - 'OrientationType'>landscape-secondary</dfn></code>. + <dfn data-dfn-for='OrientationType'>landscape-primary</dfn> or Let's move the `data-dfn-for='OrientationType'` to the `section` element, then it will just work with `<dfn>` > @@ -463,20 +460,20 @@ <li>Depending on <var>orientation</var> value, do the following: <dl> <dt> - <code><dfn for= - 'OrientationLockType'>portrait-primary</dfn></code> or - <code><dfn for= - 'OrientationLockType'>portrait-secondary</dfn></code> or - <code><dfn for= - 'OrientationLockType'>landscape-primary</dfn></code> or - <code><dfn for= - 'OrientationLockType'>landscape-secondary</dfn></code> + <dfn data-dfn-for= as above... then you don't need `data-dfn-for` here... ReSpec always looks for the nearest section with "data-dfn-for=". > @@ -702,9 +698,9 @@ </li> <li>If the orientation change was triggered by a user gesture such as the user turning the device, as opposed to a call to - <a data-link-for='ScreenOrientation'>lock</a>, the <a>task</a> - MUST be annotated with <code>process user orientation change - </code> when running the next step. + <a>lock</a>, the <a>task</a> MUST be annotated with + <code>process user orientation change</code> when running the Nit: this `code` should probably have been an `<a>` -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/w3c/screen-orientation/pull/109#pullrequestreview-73716488
Received on Thursday, 2 November 2017 09:02:21 UTC