- From: Trey Shugart <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Thu, 02 Nov 2017 22:57:54 +0000 (UTC)
- To: whatwg/dom <dom@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Thursday, 2 November 2017 22:58:17 UTC
I've been told that this may not work for a couple of reasons: 1. Styling is very much tied to DOM, thus scoping being tied to shadow DOM being enabled at the same time. 2. It may suffer from the same performance caveats that `<style scoped>` did. I'd like to understand more about these issues. I can see the first one being a blocker if it would require engines to have to decouple the two, causing large amounts of work. For the second, it's actually quite different to `<style scoped>` as it reuses the `<slot>` element as an inner boundary, making the tree that requires scoping much smaller, and also limits it to a single tree, as opposed to having multiple `<style scoped>` down the tree (this is how I understand it could be used.) Thanks again for your patience with my possible lack of understanding of the intricacies around this. cc @robdodson as we've been messaging about this. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/whatwg/dom/issues/531#issuecomment-341582486
Received on Thursday, 2 November 2017 22:58:17 UTC