- From: Ben Kelly <notifications@github.com>
- Date: Wed, 01 Nov 2017 07:04:58 -0700
- To: w3c/ServiceWorker <ServiceWorker@noreply.github.com>
- Cc: Subscribed <subscribed@noreply.github.com>
Received on Wednesday, 1 November 2017 14:05:24 UTC
> I had assumed this issue here would be a quick fix but devoting resources to #1026 is much more important. In some ways implementing #1026 is much easier to implement. At least in gecko we have a flag we can add to network requests to bypass service worker logic completely. I imagine other browsers must have something similar given current features. Implementing #1026 would simply be exposing an API to add that existing flag. > This issue mentioned here can be worked around by forcing a new service worker to install with skipWaiting which allows us to re-validate the cache or avoid registering the fetch handler to use the optimization from w3c/ServiceWorker#718. Honestly this doesn't seem like a bad way to solve the problem to me. I like that it uses our stateful versioning based on SW script identity. > A live discussion might be more effective so I'm happy to get on a call if anyone would like to discuss and get clarification on the issue. TPAC is next week. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/w3c/ServiceWorker/issues/1195#issuecomment-341115238
Received on Wednesday, 1 November 2017 14:05:24 UTC