public-sysapps@w3.org from February 2013 by date

Thursday, 28 February 2013

• Re: Proposal for a Runtime and Security Model FPWD Mounir Lamouri
• Formal proposal regrading editorial process Mounir Lamouri
• Re: Stepping down as co-chair Adam Barth
• RE: Sockets, was Re: [Raw Socket API]. New version separating UDP and TCP interfaces Nilsson, Claes1
• Re: [Execution and Security Model] Proposal from Samsung Electronics John Lyle
• Re: NFC web connection? Anders Rundgren
• Re: Stepping down as co-chair Marcos Caceres
• Stepping down as co-chair Adam Barth
• RE: Contacts API Suresh Chitturi
• Re: Contacts API Wonsuk Lee

Wednesday, 27 February 2013

• Re: [Execution and Security Model] Proposal from Samsung Electronics Mounir Lamouri
• Re: The app: URI scheme Mounir Lamouri
• Re: The app: URI scheme Mounir Lamouri
• Re: .webapps file extension, was Re: Manifest format MIME type Marcos Caceres
• Re: .webapps file extension, was Re: Manifest format MIME type Mounir Lamouri
• Re: [Execution and Security Model] Proposal from Samsung Electronics Janusz Majnert
• Re: [Execution and Security Model] Proposal from Samsung Electronics Janusz Majnert
• RE: The app: URI scheme Ming Jin
• Re: [Execution and Security Model] Proposal from Samsung Electronics Jonas Sicking

Tuesday, 26 February 2013

• Re: [Execution and Security Model] Proposal from Samsung Electronics Jonas Sicking
• Re: [Execution and Security Model] Proposal from Samsung Electronics Jonas Sicking
• Re: Sockets, was Re: [Raw Socket API]. New version separating UDP and TCP interfaces Jonas Sicking
• JSON encoding … Re: Manifest format MIME type Marcos Caceres
• .webapps file extension, was Re: Manifest format MIME type Marcos Caceres
• Re: Manifest format MIME type Bjoern Hoehrmann
• Re: Manifest format MIME type Marcos Caceres
• Re: Manifest format MIME type Bjoern Hoehrmann
• Re: Manifest format MIME type Marcos Caceres
• Re: Manifest format MIME type Fabrice Desre
• Re: The app: URI scheme Fabrice Desre
• Manifest format MIME type Marcos Caceres
• Re: The app: URI scheme Janusz Majnert
• Re: The app: URI scheme John Lyle
• Re: [Execution and Security Model] Proposal from Samsung Electronics John Lyle
• Re: [Execution and Security Model] Proposal from Samsung Electronics John Lyle
• RE: NFC web connection? 전종홍
• NFC web connection? Anders Rundgren
• Re: [Execution and Security Model] Proposal from Samsung Electronics Janusz Majnert
• Re: [Execution and Security Model] Proposal from Samsung Electronics Janusz Majnert

Monday, 25 February 2013

• RE: Sockets, was Re: [Raw Socket API]. New version separating UDP and TCP interfaces Nilsson, Claes1
• Re: [Execution and Security Model] Proposal from Samsung Electronics Mounir Lamouri
• Re: [Execution and Security Model] Proposal from Samsung Electronics Mounir Lamouri
• Re: [Execution and Security Model] Proposal from Samsung Electronics Mounir Lamouri
• Re: Contributions and editing process with sysapps repository Mounir Lamouri
• Re: question about screen_size in Runtime and Security Model Mounir Lamouri
• Re: The app: URI scheme Mounir Lamouri
• Re: Sockets, was Re: [Raw Socket API]. New version separating UDP and TCP interfaces Jonas Sicking
• Re: Sockets, was Re: [Raw Socket API]. New version separating UDP and TCP interfaces Tomoyuki SHIMIZU
• Re: Sockets, was Re: [Raw Socket API]. New version separating UDP and TCP interfaces Marcos Caceres
• Re: Sockets, was Re: [Raw Socket API]. New version separating UDP and TCP interfaces Tomoyuki SHIMIZU
• Re: [Raw Socket API]. New version separating UDP and TCP interfaces Tomoyuki SHIMIZU

Thursday, 21 February 2013

• RE: Request to make one proposal for execution model and security model Ming Jin

Sunday, 24 February 2013

• RE: [Raw Socket API]. New version separating UDP and TCP interfaces Nilsson, Claes1

Saturday, 23 February 2013

• Re: Contributions and editing process with sysapps repository Marcos Caceres
• Re: Contributions and editing process with sysapps repository Wonsuk Lee
• Re: Contributions and editing process with sysapps repository Wonsuk Lee

Friday, 22 February 2013

• Re: question about screen_size in Runtime and Security Model Lars Knudsen
• Re: question about screen_size in Runtime and Security Model Marcos Caceres
• Sockets, was Re: [Raw Socket API]. New version separating UDP and TCP interfaces Marcos Caceres
• Re: The app: URI scheme Marcos Caceres
• Re: The app: URI scheme Marcos Caceres
• Re: The app: URI scheme Marcos Caceres
• RE: The app: URI scheme John Lyle
• Re: [Raw Socket API]. New version separating UDP and TCP interfaces Tomoyuki SHIMIZU

Thursday, 21 February 2013

• Re: [Execution and Security Model] Proposal from Samsung Electronics Jonas Sicking
• Re: [Execution and Security Model] Proposal from Samsung Electronics Janusz Majnert
• Re: [Execution and Security Model] Proposal from Samsung Electronics John Lyle
• Re: [Execution and Security Model] Proposal from Samsung Electronics Janusz Majnert
• Re: Proposal for a Runtime and Security Model FPWD Marcos Caceres
• Re: Contributions and editing process with sysapps repository Robin Berjon
• RE: [Raw Socket API]. New version separating UDP and TCP interfaces Nilsson, Claes1
• Re: Concerns about DOMRequest David Bruant
• Re: question about screen_size in Runtime and Security Model Jonas Sicking
• RE: Proposal for a Runtime and Security Model FPWD Jungkee Song
• Re: question about screen_size in Runtime and Security Model Lars Knudsen
• Re: question about screen_size in Runtime and Security Model Jonas Sicking
• Supporting splash screens Marcos Caceres

Wednesday, 20 February 2013

• Re: Concerns about DOMRequest Jonas Sicking
• question about screen_size in Runtime and Security Model Lars Knudsen
• Re: Contributions and editing process with sysapps repository Brian LeRoux
• Contributions and editing process with sysapps repository Mounir Lamouri
• Re: Proposal for a Runtime and Security Model FPWD Mounir Lamouri
• Re: Proposal for a Runtime and Security Model FPWD Marcos Caceres
• Re: Proposal for a Runtime and Security Model FPWD Mounir Lamouri
• Logistics for Madrid face to face and registration Dave Raggett
• Re: Concerns about DOMRequest Mounir Lamouri
• Re: Request to make one proposal for execution model and security model John Lyle
• Re: Concerns about DOMRequest David Bruant
• Re: Concerns about DOMRequest Jonas Sicking
• Re: Concerns about DOMRequest David Bruant
• RE: Proposal for a Runtime and Security Model FPWD Jungkee Song
• Re: Concerns about DOMRequest Jonas Sicking

Tuesday, 19 February 2013

• Re: Concerns about DOMRequest David Bruant
• Re: Concerns about DOMRequest David Bruant
• Re: Request to make one proposal for execution model and security model Mounir Lamouri
• Proposal for a Runtime and Security Model FPWD Mounir Lamouri
• Re: Request to make one proposal for execution model and security model Mounir Lamouri
• Re: [Execution and Security Model] Proposal from Samsung Electronics Mounir Lamouri
• Re: The app: URI scheme Mounir Lamouri
• Re: Concerns about DOMRequest Marcos Caceres
• RE: Request to make one proposal for execution model and security model Jungkee Song
• Re: [Raw Socket API]. New version separating UDP and TCP interfaces Tomoyuki SHIMIZU

Monday, 18 February 2013

• Re: The app: URI scheme Filip Maj
• The app: URI scheme Marcos Caceres
• Re: Concerns about DOMRequest Kis, Zoltan
• Re: Concerns about DOMRequest Marcos Caceres
• Re: Concerns about DOMRequest Kis, Zoltan
• Re: [Execution and Security Model] Proposal from Samsung Electronics John Lyle
• Re: Concerns about DOMRequest Marcos Caceres
• Re: [Execution and Security Model] Proposal from Samsung Electronics Mounir Lamouri
• Re: Concerns about DOMRequest Jonas Sicking
• Re: Concerns about DOMRequest Mounir Lamouri
• Re: Concerns about DOMRequest Marcos Caceres
• Re: [Execution and Security Model] Proposal from Samsung Electronics John Lyle
• RE: Request to make one proposal for execution model and security model Jungkee Song
• RE: [Execution and Security Model] Proposal from Samsung Electronics Jungkee Song
• [Raw Socket API]. New version separating UDP and TCP interfaces Nilsson, Claes1
• Re: Concerns about DOMRequest Kenneth Rohde Christiansen
• RE: [Alarm API] Use cases Christophe Dumez - SISA

Sunday, 17 February 2013

• URI of a packaged file Marcos Caceres

Saturday, 16 February 2013

• Re: Request to make one proposal for execution model and security model Mounir Lamouri

Friday, 15 February 2013

• Re: Concerns about DOMRequest Mounir Lamouri
• Re: [Execution and Security Model] Proposal from Samsung Electronics Mounir Lamouri
• Re: [Alarm API] Waking the system up Marcos Caceres
• Re: Concerns about DOMRequest Marcos Caceres
• Re: Concerns about DOMRequest Wonsuk Lee
• Re: [Alarm API] Use cases Mounir Lamouri
• Re: Concerns about DOMRequest Mounir Lamouri
• Re: [Alarm] respectTimezone Mounir Lamouri
• Re: [Alarm API] Waking the system up Mounir Lamouri
• Re: [Alarm API] data … yet another DB? Jonas Sicking
• Re: [Alarm API] data … yet another DB? Marcos Caceres
• Re: Concerns about DOMRequest Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [Alarm API] data … yet another DB? Jonas Sicking
• Re: [Alarm] respectTimezone Marcos Caceres
• Re: [Alarm API] data … yet another DB? Marcos Caceres
• RE: Concerns about DOMRequest Christophe Dumez - SISA
• Re: Concerns about DOMRequest Marcos Caceres
• RE: [Alarm] respectTimezone Christophe Dumez - SISA
• RE: [Alarm API] Object data must be serialisable to JSON Christophe Dumez - SISA
• RE: [Alarm API] Object data must be serialisable to JSON Christophe Dumez - SISA
• Re: [Alarm] respectTimezone Jonas Sicking
• Re: [Alarm API] data … yet another DB? Jonas Sicking
• Re: Concerns about DOMRequest Jonas Sicking
• Re: [Alarm API] Object data must be serialisable to JSON Jonas Sicking
• RE: Edge Conference - Panel 6: Privileged access SULLIVAN, BRYAN L

Thursday, 14 February 2013

• Re: Concerns about DOMRequest David Bruant
• Re: [Alarm API] data … yet another DB? Marcos Caceres
• Re: [Alarm API] data … yet another DB? Kis, Zoltan
• Re: Edge Conference - Panel 6: Privileged access Wonsuk Lee
• Re: [Alarm API] data … yet another DB? Marcos Caceres
• Re: [Alarm API] data … yet another DB? Kis, Zoltan
• Re: [Alarm API] data … yet another DB? Marcos Caceres
• Re: Concerns about DOMRequest Marcos Caceres
• Re: [Alarm] respectTimezone Marcos Caceres
• Re: [Alarm API] Waking the system up Marcos Caceres
• Re: Concerns about DOMRequest Anne van Kesteren

Wednesday, 13 February 2013

• Re: [Alarm API] Waking the system up Mounir Lamouri
• Re: Concerns about DOMRequest David Bruant
• Re: [Alarm API] data … yet another DB? Kis, Zoltan
• RE: [Alarm API] data … yet another DB? Christophe Dumez - SISA
• Re: [Alarm API] data … yet another DB? Kis, Zoltan
• Re: [Alarm] respectTimezone Mounir Lamouri
• Re: Concerns about DOMRequest Kis, Zoltan
• Re: [Alarm API] data … yet another DB? Mounir Lamouri
• Re: Concerns about DOMRequest Marcos Caceres
• Re: Concerns about DOMRequest Mounir Lamouri
• Re: Concerns about DOMRequest David Bruant
• Concerns about DOMRequest Marcos Caceres
• Re: Request to make one proposal for execution model and security model Marcos Caceres
• Re: Draft Agenda for upcoming F2F Meeting Kis, Zoltan
• RE: Draft Agenda for upcoming F2F Meeting EDUARDO FULLEA CARRERA
• Re: Request to make one proposal for execution model and security model John Lyle
• RE: Request to make one proposal for execution model and security model Wonsuk Lee
• RE: Draft Agenda for upcoming F2F Meeting Wonsuk Lee
• Re: [Alarm API] Use cases Marcos Caceres
• RE: Draft Agenda for upcoming F2F Meeting Wonsuk Lee
• Re: [Alarm API] Use cases Janusz Majnert
• Re: [Alarm API] Use cases Marcos Caceres
• RE: [Alarm API] Use cases Jungkee Song
• Re: [Alarm API] Use cases Janusz Majnert

Tuesday, 12 February 2013

• Re: [Alarm API] Use cases Janusz Majnert
• Re: [Alarm API] Use cases Marcos Caceres
• Re: [Alarm API] Use cases Marcos Caceres
• RE: [Alarm API] data … yet another DB? Christophe Dumez - SISA
• Edge Conference - Panel 6: Privileged access Marcos Caceres
• [Alarm API] data … yet another DB? Marcos Caceres
• Re: [Alarm API] Use cases Robin Berjon
• RE: [Alarm API] Use cases Christophe Dumez - SISA
• RE: [Alarm] respectTimezone Christophe Dumez - SISA

Monday, 11 February 2013

• [Alarm API] Object data must be serialisable to JSON Marcos Caceres
• [Alarm] respectTimezone Marcos Caceres
• [Alarm API] Use cases Marcos Caceres
• [Alarm API] Waking the system up Marcos Caceres
• [Alarm API] Privacy/control concerns Marcos Caceres

Friday, 8 February 2013

• RE: Contacts API Suresh Chitturi

Thursday, 7 February 2013

• Affiliation change Christophe Dumez - SISA

Wednesday, 6 February 2013

• RE: Request to make one proposal for execution model and security model Jungkee Song

Tuesday, 5 February 2013

• Re: Web Alarms API is now a FPWD Wonsuk Lee
• Web Alarms API is now a FPWD Dave Raggett
• Re: Decision of dates and location for the first F2F meeting Wonsuk Lee

Monday, 4 February 2013

• Re: Decision of dates and location for the first F2F meeting Wonsuk Lee
• RE: Decision of dates and location for the first F2F meeting EDUARDO FULLEA CARRERA
• Re: Decision of dates and location for the first F2F meeting Kenneth Rohde Christiansen
• Decision of dates and location for the first F2F meeting Wonsuk Lee

Friday, 1 February 2013

• RE: Draft Agenda for upcoming F2F Meeting EDUARDO FULLEA CARRERA
• Re: Draft Agenda for upcoming F2F Meeting Kis, Zoltan
• Re: CfC: publish FPWD of Contacts API; deadline Feb 8 Christophe Dumez
• Draft Agenda for upcoming F2F Meeting Wonsuk Lee
• Re: CfC: publish FPWD of Contacts API; deadline Feb 8 Kis, Zoltan
• Re: CfC: publish FPWD of Contacts API; deadline Feb 8 Tomoyuki SHIMIZU
• Re: CfC: publish FPWD of Contacts API; deadline Feb 8 Tomoyuki SHIMIZU
• CfC: publish FPWD of Contacts API; deadline Feb 8 Wonsuk Lee
• RE: Contacts API Wonsuk Lee

Last message date: Thursday, 28 February 2013 17:32:23 UTC