- From: Jungkee Song <jungkee.song@samsung.com>
- Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2013 13:35:49 +0900
- To: 'Mounir Lamouri' <mounir@lamouri.fr>, Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc>, public-sysapps@w3.org
- Cc: ming79.jin@samsung.com, Janusz Majnert <jmajnert@gmail.com>
Hi Mounir, Jonas, On behalf of Samsung, I would like to clarify our position. What we accepted is to use Mozilla's proposal as a base document to work on as co-Editors. It's not that we stop contributions but just let it be started right away under the situation where you showed some opposite view on our merged proposal. We would like to act as co-Editors. Thanks, Jungkee > -----Original Message----- > From: Mounir Lamouri [mailto:mounir@lamouri.fr] > Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2013 3:49 AM > To: public-sysapps@w3.org > Subject: Proposal for a Runtime and Security Model FPWD > > Hi, > > I just updated "Runtime and Security Model for Web Applications" > (Mozilla's proposal) [1] to include some Samsung's ideas regarding the > execution model with application states. > > Based on previous threads, we believe that this could be a FPWD for this > specification. Given that there were competitive specifications, we wanted > to send this email before having an official CfC to make sure that other > specification authors agreed. > > [1] > http://mounirlamouri.github.com/sysapps/proposals/RunTime- > Security/Overview.html > > Thanks, > -- > Mounir
Received on Wednesday, 20 February 2013 04:36:25 UTC