- From: Wonsuk Lee <wonsuk11.lee@samsung.com>
- Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2013 22:55:19 +0900
- To: "'Kis, Zoltan'" <zoltan.kis@intel.com>
- Cc: public-sysapps@w3.org
Hi. Zoltan. Thanks for your feedback. > -----Original Message----- > From: Kis, Zoltan [mailto:zoltan.kis@intel.com] > Sent: Friday, February 01, 2013 8:26 PM > To: Wonsuk Lee > Cc: public-sysapps@w3.org > Subject: Re: Draft Agenda for upcoming F2F Meeting > > Hello, > > Thank you for drafting the agenda. > It is not clear whether all the sessions are meant to be sequential so > that everybody could attend all sessions? > > Or is it possible to have parallel sessions? At least I think we'd need > more time for the 2nd day afternoon session topics, and perhaps we could > start talking about them already during the first day (afternoon?), even > if there are a few people involved with Security too. So we'd need at > least 2 rooms. I would prefer sequential session for this meeting than parallel because this will be the first F2F meeting. In addition, I am not sure parallel session would be better. > Of course this may still change because we have just scheduled a face to > face meeting in Madrid on 11-12 February, kindly hosted by Telefonica, for > discussing Telephony and Messaging. I will try to apply your request to the agenda ;) > Then, since we have plenty of time until the F2F, would there be interest > from all group members to gather the use cases for the Phase > 2 deliverables, and optionally even draft some preliminary specifications? > As many have pointed out before, the first phase lacked going through an > essential part of design: agreeing on the needs, use cases and > implementation contexts for the API's to be specified. Individual > proposals could still add use cases, but we'd have a more solid ground for > proposals. In my point of view, it would be better if we can start discussion for 2nd phase items after we make a working draft for all of specs in phase 1. > Also, I think phase 1 would have been smoother if we started with a face > to face kick-off meeting. > Therefore I would suggest doing most of the job of aligning the > Execution/Security Model on 2nd day afternoon, keep the wrap-up on 3rd day > morning for all API's (listing remaining action requests), and in the 3rd > day leave more time for 2nd phase items, e.g. have a session for kicking > off the discussion of use cases of phase 2 deliverables - to the extent > participants of phase 1 and phase 2 overlap. I think aligning the execution/security model would be scheduled after discussing API specs. Because in the API discussion we could look for new requirements or features related with execution/security model. For the 2nd phase items, I would like to have an open discussion including schedule. Best regards, Wonsuk. > Best regards, > Zoltan > > > On Fri, Feb 1, 2013 at 12:26 PM, Wonsuk Lee <wonsuk11.lee@samsung.com> > wrote: > > Hi. Colleagues, > > > > As I said before, I made draft agenda for the first F2F meeting on our > > wiki page as below. > > > > If you have any comment, please send them to mailing list. It’s more > > than welcome!! > > > > > > > > http://www.w3.org/wiki/System_Applications:_1st_F2F_Meeting_Agenda > > > > > > > > Best regards, > > > > Wonsuk. > > > > ========================================= > > > > 이 원 석 (Wonsuk, Lee) / Principal Engineer, Ph.D > > > > SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS Co., LTD. (三星電子) > > > > Mobile: +82-10-5800-3997 > > > > E-mail: wonsuk11.lee@samsung.com > > > > http://www.wonsuk73.com/, twitter: @wonsuk73 > > > > ----------------------------------------- > > > > Inspire the World, Create the Future !!! > > > > ========================================= > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Intel Finland Oy > > Registered Address: PL 281, 00181 Helsinki Business Identity Code: > > 0357606 - 4 Domiciled in Helsinki > > > > This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for > > the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distribution > > by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended > > recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies.
Received on Wednesday, 13 February 2013 13:56:37 UTC