- From: Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc>
- Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2013 17:24:34 -0800
- To: Lars Knudsen <larsgk@gmail.com>
- Cc: public-sysapps@w3.org
On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 1:31 PM, Lars Knudsen <larsgk@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > ( related proposal: > http://mounirlamouri.github.com/sysapps/proposals/RunTime-Security/Overview.html > ) > > I think it's good that you are working on a spec to encapsulate what is > needed to make it somewhat easy to do generic app descriptors for web apps - > as opposed to fiddling with all kinds of Apple (or other) specific tags and > tricks to make webapps behave the same across platforms. However, I am not > too fond of the spec proposal I found on github, where the screen_size > options seem limited to minimum width/height. > > What I need as an app developer, is the viewport meta tag "done right", > where I can say, e.g. "give me a screen of 1920 x 1080 (virtual) pixels" and > the platform would figure out how to best match it within the device > currently displaying it. Of course, the actual pixel count could be made > available to the application, but to make it very simple for 99% cases, > where you just need a virtual fixed size game/app area - and be sure it's > fixed - why not just provide an easy way of doing so? Currently, it seems > that - apart from preventing auto orientation change, iOS is the only > platform providing this (through viewport tricks, event stealing, etc.) and > IE is getting there. Wouldn't this result in black top/bottom or left/right edges on most screens? Isn't this fairly undesirable in most cases? Also, I wonder if this wouldn't be better solved using CSS somehow. I.e. to be able to say that you want a window to be scaled to a certain aspect ratio. In particular, this seems like something that web page authors would want access to, which means that sticking this feature in an application manifest isn't a good solution. > Given that this spec could be the NextBigThing(TM) for webapps, please make > sure game and app developers are heard - not just platform implementors and > spec'ers ;) Absolutely! That's not just true for this spec, but for every spec developed at W3C. Unfortunately it's still something we're not great at. We're trying to get better at this. / Jonas
Received on Thursday, 21 February 2013 01:25:31 UTC