- From: Mounir Lamouri <mounir@lamouri.fr>
- Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2013 16:43:50 +0000
- To: public-sysapps@w3.org
On 26/02/13 18:28, Marcos Caceres wrote: > On Tuesday, 26 February 2013 at 18:18, Bjoern Hoehrmann wrote: > >>>>> File extension(s): >>>>> .webapp >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> That choice requires some justification. >>> >>> >>> Um … FireFox OS did it? >> >> That does not mean it's a good choice. I would not expect a JSON file >> under that extension, more likely a ZIP file or some such. I recommend >> to write up some argument in support of using the extension before the >> proposal goes to ietf-types or other review stages. Or picking a better >> extension. > > I have to admit, I had the same confusion (I thought .webapp was the zip component of the proposal). > > I don't mind, but lets sort this out quickly… > > .mjson ? Why .mjson? Can't we use the same extension for both type of files? -- Mounir
Received on Wednesday, 27 February 2013 16:44:15 UTC