- From: Marcos Caceres <w3c@marcosc.com>
- Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2013 18:03:54 +0000
- To: Mounir Lamouri <mounir@lamouri.fr>
- Cc: "public-sysapps@w3.org" <public-sysapps@w3.org>
On 27/02/2013, at 4:43 PM, Mounir Lamouri <mounir@lamouri.fr> wrote: > On 26/02/13 18:28, Marcos Caceres wrote: >> On Tuesday, 26 February 2013 at 18:18, Bjoern Hoehrmann wrote: >> >>>>>> File extension(s): >>>>>> .webapp >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> That choice requires some justification. >>>> >>>> >>>> Um … FireFox OS did it? >>> >>> That does not mean it's a good choice. I would not expect a JSON file >>> under that extension, more likely a ZIP file or some such. I recommend >>> to write up some argument in support of using the extension before the >>> proposal goes to ietf-types or other review stages. Or picking a better >>> extension. >> >> I have to admit, I had the same confusion (I thought .webapp was the zip component of the proposal). >> >> I don't mind, but lets sort this out quickly… >> >> .mjson ? > > Why .mjson? Manifest + JSON. > Can't we use the same extension for both type of files? That would make it hard to configure servers. > > -- > Mounir >
Received on Wednesday, 27 February 2013 18:04:26 UTC