RE: Draft Agenda for upcoming F2F Meeting

Hi Wonsuk,

On 13 feb 2013 at 15:02:40, Wonsuk Lee wrote:
> Hi. Eduardo.
>
> EDUARDO FULLEA CARRERA wrote on February 01, 2013 11:10 PM:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Thanks Wonsuk for putting together this draft agenda. In general I am fine
>> with it, but I tend to agree with Zoltan that the topics of 2nd day's
>> afternoon may deserve more time.
>
> Could you let us know how much time would be better?

I think these topics may well deserve a full day, if possible.

>
>> Regarding the meeting we are setting up in Madrid on 11-12 February, it
>> intends to gather the editors of the Messaging & Telephony proposals to
>> try to converge towards a common draft, but if any other member of the
>> group wants to attend no problem, just tell us. Of course this does not
>> affect our offer to host the F2F meeting in April.
>
> How about editor's meeting for messaging and telephony proposals? I hope
> that you guys have a big step!

We definitely made progress on messaging and telephony. Now we need to reflect the conclusions in a converged proposal for each of the APIs, which we will submit for group's review as soon as they are ready.

>
> Best regards,
> Wonsuk.
>
>> Have a nice weekend,
>> Eduardo.
>>
>> Kis, Zoltan wrote on e febrero de 2013 12:26:
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> Thank you for drafting the agenda.
>>> It is not clear whether all the sessions are meant to be sequential so
>>> that everybody could attend all sessions?
>>>
>>> Or is it possible to have parallel sessions? At least I think we'd
>>> need more time for the 2nd day afternoon session topics, and perhaps
>>> we could start talking about them already during the first day
>>> (afternoon?), even if there are a few people involved with Security
>>> too. So we'd need at least 2 rooms.
>>>
>>> Of course this may still change because we have just scheduled a face
>>> to face meeting in Madrid on 11-12 February, kindly hosted by
>>> Telefonica, for discussing Telephony and Messaging.
>>>
>>> Then, since we have plenty of time until the F2F, would there be
>>> interest from all group members to gather the use cases for the Phase
>>> 2 deliverables, and optionally even draft some preliminary
>>> specifications?
>>> As many have pointed out before, the first phase lacked going through
>>> an essential part of design: agreeing on the needs, use cases and
>>> implementation contexts for the API's to be specified. Individual
>>> proposals could still add use cases, but we'd have a more solid ground
>>> for proposals.
>>>
>>> Also, I think phase 1 would have been smoother if we started with a
>>> face to face kick-off meeting. Therefore I would suggest doing most of
>>> the job of aligning the Execution/Security Model on 2nd day afternoon,
>>> keep the wrap-up on 3rd day morning for all API's (listing remaining
>>> action requests), and in the 3rd day leave more time for 2nd phase
>>> items, e.g. have a session for kicking off the discussion of use cases
>>> of phase 2 deliverables - to the extent participants of phase 1 and
>>> phase 2 overlap.
>>>
>>> Best regards,
>>> Zoltan
>>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, Feb 1, 2013 at 12:26 PM, Wonsuk Lee <wonsuk11.lee@samsung.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>> Hi. Colleagues,
>>>>
>>>> As I said before, I made draft agenda for the first F2F meeting on
>>>> our wiki page as below.
>>>>
>>>> If you have any comment, please send them to mailing list. It’s more
>>>> than welcome!!
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> http://www.w3.org/wiki/System_Applications:_1st_F2F_Meeting_Agenda

>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Best regards,
>>>>
>>>> Wonsuk.
>>>>
>>>> =========================================
>>>>
>>>> 이 원 석 (Wonsuk, Lee) / Principal Engineer, Ph.D
>>>>
>>>> SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS Co., LTD. (三星電子)
>>>>
>>>> Mobile: +82-10-5800-3997
>>>>
>>>> E-mail: wonsuk11.lee@samsung.com
>>>>
>>>> http://www.wonsuk73.com/, twitter: @wonsuk73
>>>>
>>>> -----------------------------------------
>>>>
>>>> Inspire the World, Create the Future !!!
>>>>
>>>> =========================================
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> -
>>>> Intel Finland Oy
>>>> Registered Address: PL 281, 00181 Helsinki Business Identity Code:
>>>> 0357606 - 4 Domiciled in Helsinki
>>>>
>>>> This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material
>>>> for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or
>>>> distribution by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the
>>>> intended recipient, please contact the sender and delete all copies.
>>
>>
>> ________________________________
>>
>> Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar
>> nuestra política de envío y recepción de correo electrónico en el enlace
>> situado más abajo.
>> This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and
>> receive email on the basis of the terms set out at:
>> http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx


________________________________

Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra política de envío y recepción de correo electrónico en el enlace situado más abajo.
This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at:
http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx

Received on Wednesday, 13 February 2013 16:00:23 UTC