Saturday, 29 September 2007
Friday, 28 September 2007
- [ARCH] RIF extensibility
- Comments on BLD draft
- RIF BLD Syntaxes: Translation Table
- Re: Thought on AS/PS/XS triangle question
- whiteboard photos from F2F7
- Re: Thought on AS/PS/XS triangle question
- Thought on AS/PS/XS triangle question
Thursday, 27 September 2007
- F2f7 partial early transcript
- Slide set on data sets/data models
- ACTION-350: Write up use case on membership-formula
- ISSUE-39: RIF should support import or inclusion of rulesets
- ISSUE-38: Interoperation with Arbitrary XML (like SAX/DOM)
- ISSUE-37: Interoperation with Object-Oriented XML (using XML Schema, like JAXB)
- Re: [BLD] some more commments which I didn't manage to type in yesterday...
- [BLD] some more commments which I didn't manage to type in yesterday...
- ISSUE-36: Mapping between XML and Presentation Syntaxes
- RIF BLD Syntaxes: Distinctions Grammar/Instance vs. Presentation/Abstract/XML
- RIF BLD Syntaxes: Presentation, Abstract, XML
- F2F seating
Wednesday, 26 September 2007
- RIF BLD comments
- RE: [ACTION-331] Mappings from existing data models vs defining a new data modelling language
- Re: [ACTION-331] Mappings from existing data models vs defining a new data modelling language
- [ACTION-331] Mappings from existing data models vs defining a new data modelling language
- Re: comments on BLD draft part II
- Re: comments on BLD draft part I
Tuesday, 25 September 2007
- Re: ISSUE-34: extensibility of datatype support
- Re: signature terminology (editorial BLD issue)
- Re: signature terminology (editorial BLD issue)
- Re: signature terminology (editorial BLD issue)
- Re: signature terminology (editorial BLD issue)
- Re: bld vs. rif
- Some interesting relevant readings ...
- Re: bld vs. rif
- Re: issues with BLD0921 (part 1 of n)
- Re: bld vs. rif
- Re: bld vs. rif
- Re: issues with BLD0921 (part 1 of n)
- Re: signature terminology (editorial BLD issue)
- signature terminology (editorial BLD issue)
- Re: issues with BLD0921 (part 1 of n)
- bld vs. rif
- RIF Telecon 25 June 2007 -- 25 Sep 2007
- ISSUE-35: semantics of symbol spaces
- ISSUE-34: extensibility of datatype support
- Re: read BLD draft for f2f
- editorial comments on BLD draft part II
- comments on BLD draft part II
- editorial comments on BLD draft part I
- comments on BLD draft part I
- bld draft with yesterday's changes
- [Admin] Agenda RIF telecon 25 September
- Re: XML Syntax Issues, xsi:type vs rif:type
- Re: [TED] Uploaded and Attached to this email slightly revised Editors' Working Draft of "RIF Basic Logic Dialect", without wiki-tr diagnostics, Sept 21, 2007, for F2F7
- Re: [TED] Uploaded and Attached to this email slightly revised Editors' Working Draft of "RIF Basic Logic Dialect", without wiki-tr diagnostics, Sept 21, 2007, for F2F7
- Re: [TED] Uploaded and Attached to this email slightly revised Editors' Working Draft of "RIF Basic Logic Dialect", without wiki-tr diagnostics, Sept 21, 2007, for F2F7
- Re: Comments (typos and wording suggestions) on the 9/21 version of BLD document
- Re: read BLD draft for f2f
- [RIF] Sept 18, Telecon Minutes (revised)
- Re: issues with BLD0921 (part 1 of n)
- Re: issues with BLD0921 (part 1 of n)
- Re: read BLD draft for f2f
- Re: Comments (typos and wording suggestions) on the 9/21 version of BLD document
Monday, 24 September 2007
- Re: read BLD draft for f2f
- Re: read BLD draft for f2f
- Re: [TED] Uploaded and Attached to this email slightly revised Editors' Working Draft of "RIF Basic Logic Dialect", without wiki-tr diagnostics, Sept 21, 2007, for F2F7
- dinner thursday
- Re: [TED] Uploaded and Attached to this email slightly revised Editors' Working Draft of "RIF Basic Logic Dialect", without wiki-tr diagnostics, Sept 21, 2007, for F2F7
- Comments (typos and wording suggestions) on the 9/21 version of BLD document
- Re: read BLD draft for f2f
- Re: example of asn07 as OWL subset, musings on RDF/XML
- issues with BLD0921 (part 1 of n)
- Re: XML Syntax Issues, xsi:type vs rif:type
- XML Syntax Issues, xsi:type vs rif:type
- Re: XML Syntax Issues / root element
- Re: [TED] Uploaded slightly revised Editors' Working Draft of "RIF Basic Logic Dialect", Sept 21, 2007, for F2F7
- RE: XML Syntax Issues / root element
- RE: XML Syntax Issues / root element
- XML Syntax Issues / root element
- Naming Conventions
Sunday, 23 September 2007
- [Admin] Reading list for F2F7
- Re: [RIF] Minutes of of Sept. 18 telecon
- Re: [RIF] Minutes of of Sept. 18 telecon
- [RIF] Minutes of of Sept. 18 telecon
Saturday, 22 September 2007
- diff: bld 0914 to 0921 drafts
- [TED] Uploaded and Attached to this email slightly revised Editors' Working Draft of "RIF Basic Logic Dialect", without wiki-tr diagnostics, Sept 21, 2007, for F2F7
- [TED] Uploaded slightly revised Editors' Working Draft of "RIF Basic Logic Dialect", Sept 21, 2007, for F2F7
- [TED] Uploaded slightly revised Editors' Working Draft of "RIF Basic Logic Dialect", Sept 21, 2007, for F2F7
Friday, 21 September 2007
Tuesday, 18 September 2007
- Re: example of asn07 as OWL subset, musings on RDF/XML
- Re: example of asn07 as OWL subset, musings on RDF/XML
- Re: example of asn07 as OWL subset, musings on RDF/XML
- example of asn07 as OWL subset, musings on RDF/XML
- new member
- xml syntax issues
- Re: Naming Conventions
- Re: Naming Conventions
Monday, 17 September 2007
- Naming Conventions
- [Admin] Agenda for RIF telecon 18 September
- [Admin] Agenda for RIF telecon 18 September
Friday, 14 September 2007
- Issues List
- [TED] Uploaded Editors' Working Draft of "RIF Basic Logic Dialect", Sept 14, 2007, for F2F7
Thursday, 13 September 2007
Wednesday, 12 September 2007
- wiki performance
- [RIF-RDF] extension with datatype entailment
- F2F8 Hotel deadline fast approaching (3 October)
- November RIF f2f in Boston
Tuesday, 11 September 2007
- [Admin] telecon minutes, 11 Sept 2007
- Naming Conventions
- Re: To embed or combine
- RE: To embed or combine
- first shot OWL compatibility page
- Re: To embed or combine
- [BLD] datatype support: bringing more in line with RDF and OWL, and making it more extensible
- Re: To embed or combine
- Re: To embed or combine
- Re: To embed or combine
- Re: To embed or combine
- Re: To embed or combine
- Re: To embed or combine
- Re: To embed or combine
Monday, 10 September 2007
- Re: To embed or combine
- Re: To embed or combine
- Re: To embed or combine
- Re: [TED] Abstract Syntax and Abstract-to-Concrete Mappings
- [Admin] Agenda for RIF telecon 11 September
- Re: [TED] Abstract Syntax and Abstract-to-Concrete Mappings
- Re: To embed or combine
- Re: [TED] Abstract Syntax and Abstract-to-Concrete Mappings
- Arch
- abstract syntax naming conventions
- RE: [TED] Abstract Syntax and Abstract-to-Concrete Mappings
- Re: To embed or combine
- Re: [TED] Abstract Syntax and Abstract-to-Concrete Mappings
- Re: To embed or combine
- Re: To embed or combine
- Re: To embed or combine
- Re: To embed or combine
- Re: To embed or combine
- Re: To embed or combine
- Re: Presentation about RIF at the Reasoning Web summer school 2007 last Friday
- Re: [TED] Abstract Syntax and Abstract-to-Concrete Mappings
- Re: [TED] Abstract Syntax and Abstract-to-Concrete Mappings
- Re: [TED] Abstract Syntax and Abstract-to-Concrete Mappings
- [TED] Abstract Syntax and Abstract-to-Concrete Mappings
- Re: To embed or combine
- [TED] Abstract Syntax and Abstract-to-Concrete Mappings
Sunday, 9 September 2007
Saturday, 8 September 2007
- Re: open issues in RIF-BLD, RIF-RDF: metadata, built-ins
- Re: open issues in RIF-BLD, RIF-RDF: metadata, built-ins
Friday, 7 September 2007
- Re: [RIF-RDF] Embedding vs. model-theory [was: Re: [RIF-RDF] rationale for a model-theoretic semantics for combinations]
- state of the BLD draft
- Re: sbnf (striped BNF)
- Re: [RIF-RDF] Embedding vs. model-theory [was: Re: [RIF-RDF] rationale for a model-theoretic semantics for combinations]
- Re: sbnf (striped BNF)
Thursday, 6 September 2007
- new OWL WG
- Re: [RIF-RDF] rationale for a model-theoretic semantics for combinations
- Re: [RIF-RDF] Embedding vs. model-theory [was: Re: [RIF-RDF] rationale for a model-theoretic semantics for combinations]
- revised minutes of Sept 4 telecon
- [Fwd: Transition announcement, XML Schema 1.1 Part 1: Structures to Last Call Working Draft]
- Re: [RIF-RDF] rationale for a model-theoretic semantics for combinations
- [RIF-RDF] Embedding vs. model-theory [was: Re: [RIF-RDF] rationale for a model-theoretic semantics for combinations]
- Re: [RIF-RDF] rationale for a model-theoretic semantics for combinations
- Re: [RIF-RDF] rationale for a model-theoretic semantics for combinations
- Re: [RIF-RDF] rationale for a model-theoretic semantics for combinations
- Re: [RIF-RDF] rationale for a model-theoretic semantics for combinations
- Re: sbnf (striped BNF)
- Re: sbnf (striped BNF)
- Re: sbnf (striped BNF)
- Re: sbnf (striped BNF)
Wednesday, 5 September 2007
- Re: sbnf (striped BNF)
- Re: sbnf (striped BNF)
- Re: [RIF-RDF] rationale for a model-theoretic semantics for combinations
- Re: sbnf (striped BNF)
- RE: sbnf (striped BNF)
- RIF telecon minutes for September 4 2007
- Re: [RIF-RDF] rationale for a model-theoretic semantics for combinations
Tuesday, 4 September 2007
- Re: [RIF-RDF] rationale for a model-theoretic semantics for combinations
- open issues in RIF-BLD, RIF-RDF: metadata, built-ins
Monday, 3 September 2007
- [RIF-RDF] rationale for a model-theoretic semantics for combinations
- RE: sbnf (striped BNF)
- [RIF-RDF] update of RDF compatibility section
- [Admin] Agenda for RIF telecon September 4
- Re: [RIF-RDF] (potential) issues regarding correspondence of identifiers
- Re: [RIF-RDF] (potential) issues regarding correspondence of identifiers
- Re: [RIF-RDF] (potential) issues regarding correspondence of identifiers
- Re: [RIF-RDF] (potential) issues regarding correspondence of identifiers
- RE: sbnf (striped BNF)
- Re: [RIF-RDF] (potential) issues regarding correspondence of identifiers
- Re: [RIF-RDF] (potential) issues regarding correspondence of identifiers
- [RIF-RDF] (potential) issues regarding correspondence of identifiers