- From: Jos de Bruijn <debruijn@inf.unibz.it>
- Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2007 16:51:59 +0200
- To: RIF <public-rif-wg@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <46E7FD0F.1000906@inf.unibz.it>
Dear all, I extended the RIF-RDF combination page [1] to also include (restricted) datatype entailment. I realized that the definition of datatype entailment in the RDF semantics specification is not informative (as I previously thought), but normative. In fact, OWL Full extends RDF datatype entailment. As I pointed out in another e-mail [2], the datatype support in RDF (datatype entailment) is more flexible than the datatype support in RIF; it allows to consider arbitrary datatypes, whereas RIF currently only considers a fixed set of datatypes. Therefore, the combination with datatype entailment is only defined for the restricted case that those that only those datatypes "supported by" RIF are considered. This restriction could be lifted if the datatype support in RIF would be made more flexible, e.g. along the lines of my proposal in [2]. Best, Jos [1] http://www.w3.org/2005/rules/wg/wiki/Core/RIF-RDF_Compatibility [2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rif-wg/2007Sep/0079.html -- debruijn@inf.unibz.it Jos de Bruijn, http://www.debruijn.net/ ---------------------------------------------- In heaven all the interesting people are missing. - Friedrich Nietzsche
Received on Wednesday, 12 September 2007 14:52:26 UTC