- From: Jos de Bruijn <debruijn@inf.unibz.it>
- Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2007 10:30:45 +0200
- To: Stella Mitchell <cleo@us.ibm.com>
- CC: public-rif-wg@w3.org
- Message-ID: <46F8C735.8040202@inf.unibz.it>
Stella, Thanks for the comments. I fixed the errors you point out in section 4. Further responses to your comments: > 4.2 > ----- > "It turns out that reasoning" --> "Reasoning" Why should this be capitalized? > 4.2.2.1 > --------- > Consistenly refers to RIF structure vs. RDF interpretation. Is > there meant to be a distinction > (between the structure and the interpretation)? This is merely a matter of terminology. In the RIF specification, interpretations/structures are called structures, and in the RDF specification interpretation/structures are called interpretations. > 3rd bullet: > "power set of" --> "cartesian product" ? It is actually the power set of the cartesian product IR x IR; IEXT maps each element IP to a subset of IR x IR. > 7th & 8th conditions: > I don't understand why the RIF mapping IC isn't used instead of > IF ? This was an error. I changed it to I,,C,, > 4.2.3.2 > --------- > Mapping column for TRq mapping: > > "?xn" --> "xn" There was indeed a mistake here. However, it was exactly the other way around. x1 had to be renamed to ?x1; in RIF, variable symbols are preceded by a question mark. > "tr(S)" --> "S" ? I did not understand what you meant here. > 4.2.3.3 > --------- > is the TRs function different for each graph? (the different > subscripts) No, this was a mistake. I renamed the embedding T,,S,, to T,,R,,, to avoid confusion. best, Jos -- Jos de Bruijn debruijn@inf.unibz.it +390471016224 http://www.debruijn.net/ ---------------------------------------------- The third-rate mind is only happy when it is thinking with the majority. The second-rate mind is only happy when it is thinking with the minority. The first-rate mind is only happy when it is thinking. - AA Milne
Received on Tuesday, 25 September 2007 08:31:00 UTC