public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org from February 2009 by date

Saturday, 28 February 2009

• Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel Ben Adida
• Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel Rob Sayre
• Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel Ben Adida
• Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel Rob Sayre
• Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel Sam Ruby
• Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel Rob Sayre
• Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com
• Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel Maciej Stachowiak
• Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel Sam Ruby
• Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel Manu Sporny
• Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel Karl Dubost
• Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel Julian Reschke
• Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel Ben Adida
• Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel Julian Reschke
• Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel Julian Reschke
• Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel Ben Adida
• Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel Julian Reschke
• Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel Ben Adida
• Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel Ben Adida
• Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel Julian Reschke
• Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel Sam Ruby

Friday, 27 February 2009

• Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel Ben Adida
• Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel Mark Nottingham
• Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel Ben Adida
• Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel Mark Nottingham
• Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel Dan Brickley
• Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel Julian Reschke
• Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel Ben Adida
• Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel Julian Reschke
• Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel Ben Adida
• Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel Robert J Burns
• Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel Julian Reschke
• Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel Ben Adida
• Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel Julian Reschke
• Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com
• Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel Ben Adida
• Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel Ben Adida
• Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel Henri Sivonen
• Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel Manu Sporny
• Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel Julian Reschke
• Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel Manu Sporny
• Re: [Fwd: Using XMLNS in link/@rel] Julian Reschke
• Re: [Fwd: Using XMLNS in link/@rel] Steven Pemberton
• Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel Shane McCarron
• Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel Henri Sivonen
• Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel Karl Dubost
• Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel Henri Sivonen
• Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel Henri Sivonen
• Re: [Fwd: Using XMLNS in link/@rel] Mark Nottingham
• Re: [Fwd: Using XMLNS in link/@rel] Julian Reschke
• Re: [Fwd: Using XMLNS in link/@rel] Phil Archer
• Re: [Fwd: Using XMLNS in link/@rel] Mark Nottingham
• Re: [Fwd: Using XMLNS in link/@rel] Steven Pemberton
• Re: [Fwd: Using XMLNS in link/@rel] Shane McCarron
• [Fwd: Using XMLNS in link/@rel] Dan Brickley

Thursday, 26 February 2009

• RE: FYI: dear adobe here's an idea for you Martin McEvoy
• Re: CURIE objections in HTML5+RDFa Toby A Inkster
• Re: RDFa DTD and HTML character entity Shane McCarron
• Re: RDFa DTD and HTML character entity KANZAKI Masahide
• Re: RDFa DTD and HTML character entity Shane McCarron
• Re: RDFa DTD and HTML character entity Mark Birbeck
• Re: RDFa DTD and HTML character entity Toby A Inkster
• Re: CURIE objections in HTML5+RDFa Henri Sivonen
• Re: [Fwd: FYI: Link -04] Michael Hausenblas
• RDFa DTD and HTML character entity KANZAKI Masahide

Wednesday, 25 February 2009

• Re: CURIE objections in HTML5+RDFa Manu Sporny
• Re: CURIE objections in HTML5+RDFa Manu Sporny
• [Fwd: FYI: Link -04] Shane McCarron
• Re: CURIE objections in HTML5+RDFa Henri Sivonen
• Re: CURIE objections in HTML5+RDFa Henri Sivonen
• RE: FYI: dear adobe here's an idea for you Jeremy Carroll

Tuesday, 24 February 2009

• RE: FYI: dear adobe here's an idea for you Larry Masinter
• Re: FYI: dear adobe here's an idea for you Dan Brickley
• Re: RDFa Questions Answered (part 1/N) Ben Adida
• Re: FYI: dear adobe here's an idea for you Ben Adida
• FYI: dear adobe here's an idea for you Martin McEvoy
• Re: RDFa Questions Answered (part 1/N) Manu Sporny
• Updates to RDFa wiki Manu Sporny

Monday, 23 February 2009

• Re: RDFa Questions Answered (part 1/N) Ben Adida
• RDFa Questions Answered (part 1/N) (was: Re: RDFa and Web Directions North 2009) Manu Sporny

Saturday, 21 February 2009

• RDFa Task Force Charter Scope Manu Sporny

Friday, 20 February 2009

• Re: CURIE objections in HTML5+RDFa Manu Sporny
• Re: CURIE objections in HTML5+RDFa Ben Adida

Thursday, 19 February 2009

• meeting record: 2009-02-19 RDFa Task Force Ralph R. Swick
• Re: RDFa and Web Directions North 2009 Karl Dubost
• Re: telecon Thursday - 19 February Manu Sporny
• Re: telecon Thursday - 19 February Mark Birbeck
• Re: CURIE objections in HTML5+RDFa Henri Sivonen
• Re: RDFa and Web Directions North 2009 Henri Sivonen
• Re: RDFa and Web Directions North 2009 Henri Sivonen
• Re: telecon Thursday - 19 February Michael Hausenblas
• Re: telecon Thursday - 19 February Manu Sporny
• Re: RDFa Security and Persistence Manu Sporny
• telecon Thursday - 19 February Ben Adida
• Re: RDFa Security and Persistence Dan Brickley
• RDFa Security and Persistence (was: Re: RDFa Use Cases) Manu Sporny
• Re: RDFa Use Cases Ben Adida
• Re: RDFa Use Cases Ian Hickson

Wednesday, 18 February 2009

• Re: RDFa Use Cases Manu Sporny
• Re: RDFa and Web Directions North 2009 Karl Dubost
• Re: New Threads Request Sam Ruby
• New Threads Request (was: Re: RDFa and Web Directions North 2009) Manu Sporny
• Re: RDFa and Web Directions North 2009 Henri Sivonen
• Re: CURIE objections in HTML5+RDFa Manu Sporny
• Re: CURIE objections in HTML5+RDFa (was: Re: RDFa and Web Directions North 2009) Elias Torres
• Re: RDFa Use Cases Dan Brickley
• Re: RDFa Use Cases Danny Ayers
• Re: RDFa and Web Directions North 2009 Mark Birbeck
• Re: RDFa and Web Directions North 2009 Dan Brickley
• Re: RDFa and Web Directions North 2009 Henri Sivonen
• Re: RDFa and Web Directions North 2009 Sam Ruby
• Re: RDFa and Web Directions North 2009 Henri Sivonen
• Re: RDFa and Web Directions North 2009 Henri Sivonen
• Re: RDFa and Web Directions North 2009 Julian Reschke
• Re: RDFa and Web Directions North 2009 Sam Ruby
• Re: RDFa and Web Directions North 2009 Mark Birbeck
• Re: RDFa and Web Directions North 2009 Henri Sivonen
• Re: RDFa and Web Directions North 2009 Julian Reschke
• Re: RDFa and Web Directions North 2009 Henri Sivonen
• Re: RDFa and Web Directions North 2009 Henri Sivonen
• Re: RDFa and Web Directions North 2009 Julian Reschke
• Re: RDFa and Web Directions North 2009 Henri Sivonen
• Re: RDFa and Web Directions North 2009 Dan Brickley
• Re: CURIE objections in HTML5+RDFa (was: Re: RDFa and Web Directions North 2009) Henri Sivonen
• Re: RDFa and Web Directions North 2009 Mark Birbeck
• Re: RDFa and Web Directions North 2009 Dan Brickley
• Re: RDFa and Web Directions North 2009 Mark Birbeck
• Re: RDFa Use Cases Danny Ayers
• Re: RDFa and Web Directions North 2009 Julian Reschke
• Re: RDFa and Web Directions North 2009 Henri Sivonen
• Re: RDFa and Web Directions North 2009 Henri Sivonen
• Re: RDFa Use Cases Martin McEvoy

Tuesday, 17 February 2009

• Re: RDFa Use Cases Ian Hickson
• W3C Validator 0.8.5 Toby A Inkster
• Re: HTML5 & SQL Engine Persistence Kingsley Idehen
• Re: RDFa and Web Directions North 2009 Ben Adida
• Re: RDFa and Web Directions North 2009 Julian Reschke
• Re: RDFa and Web Directions North 2009 Ben Adida
• Re: RDFa and Web Directions North 2009 Henri Sivonen
• Re: RDFa and Web Directions North 2009 Ben Adida
• User Agent conformance requirements for RDFa [was Re: RDFa and Web Directions North 2009] Toby A Inkster
• Re: RDFa Use Cases Manu Sporny
• Re: HTML5 & SQL Engine Persistence Dan Brickley
• HTML5 & SQL Engine Persistence Kingsley Idehen
• Re: Named Graphs in RDFa Mark Birbeck
• Re: RDFa and Web Directions North 2009 Ian Hickson
• Re: Named Graphs in RDFa Mark Birbeck
• Re: RDFa and Web Directions North 2009 Dan Brickley
• Re: Named Graphs in RDFa Kjetil Kjernsmo
• Re: RDFa and Web Directions North 2009 Ben Adida
• Re: RDFa and Web Directions North 2009 Ian Hickson
• CURIE objections in HTML5+RDFa (was: Re: RDFa and Web Directions North 2009) Manu Sporny
• Re: RDFa Use Cases (was: RDFa and Web Directions North 2009) Ian Hickson

Monday, 16 February 2009

• Re: Named Graphs in RDFa Toby A Inkster
• Re: RDFa and Web Directions North 2009 Kingsley Idehen
• Re: RDFa and Web Directions North 2009 Julian Reschke
• Re: RDFa and Web Directions North 2009 Henri Sivonen
• Re: RDFa and Web Directions North 2009 Ivan Herman
• Re: RDFa and Web Directions North 2009 Ivan Herman
• Re: RDFa and Web Directions North 2009 Henri Sivonen
• Re: RDFa and Web Directions North 2009 Sam Ruby
• Re: RDFa and Web Directions North 2009 Ivan Herman
• Re: RDFa and Web Directions North 2009 Mark Birbeck
• Re: RDFa and Web Directions North 2009 Henri Sivonen
• Re: RDFa and Web Directions North 2009 Mark Birbeck
• Re: RDFa and Web Directions North 2009 Henri Sivonen
• Re: RDFa and Web Directions North 2009 Ivan Herman
• Re: RDFa and Web Directions North 2009 Henri Sivonen
• Re: RDFa and Web Directions North 2009 Henri Sivonen
• Re: RDFa and Web Directions North 2009 Henri Sivonen
• Re: RDFa and Web Directions North 2009 Ivan Herman
• Re: RDFa and Web Directions North 2009 Mark Birbeck
• Re: RDFa and Web Directions North 2009 Henri Sivonen

Sunday, 15 February 2009

• RDFa Use Cases (was: RDFa and Web Directions North 2009) Manu Sporny
• Re: RDFa and Web Directions North 2009 Ben Adida
• Re: RDFa and Web Directions North 2009 Toby A Inkster
• Re: Google adds another link type Simon Reinhardt
• Re: Google adds another link type Julian Reschke
• Re: RDFa and Web Directions North 2009 Kingsley Idehen
• Google adds another link type Ben Adida
• RE: RDFa and Web Directions North 2009 Jeremy Carroll
• Re: RDFa and Web Directions North 2009 Ian Hickson

Saturday, 14 February 2009

• Re: RDFa and Web Directions North 2009 Manu Sporny
• Re: Updates to RDFa Use Cases Manu Sporny
• Re: Updates to RDFa Use Cases (was: RDFa and Web Directions North 2009) Karl Dubost
• Re: Updates to RDFa Use Cases Manu Sporny
• Re: RDFa Wiki Ben Adida
• Re: RDFa Wiki Sam Ruby
• Re: RDFa Wiki Kingsley Idehen
• Re: RDFa Wiki Nathan Yergler
• RDFa Wiki Kingsley Idehen
• Re: RDFa and Web Directions North 2009 Kingsley Idehen
• Re: Updates to RDFa Use Cases Sam Ruby
• Re: RDFa and Web Directions North 2009 Julian Reschke
• Updates to RDFa Use Cases (was: RDFa and Web Directions North 2009) Manu Sporny
• Re: RDFa and Web Directions North 2009 Ben Adida
• RE: RDFa and Web Directions North 2009 Jeremy Carroll
• RE: RDFa and Web Directions North 2009 Jeremy Carroll
• Re: RDFa and Web Directions North 2009 Kjetil Kjernsmo
• Re: RDFa and Web Directions North 2009 Ben Adida
• Re: RDFa and Web Directions North 2009 Sam Ruby
• Re: RDFa and Web Directions North 2009 Ian Hickson

Friday, 13 February 2009

• Re: RDFa and Web Directions North 2009 Ian Hickson
• Re: RDFa and Web Directions North 2009 Mark Birbeck
• Re: RDFa and Web Directions North 2009 Ben Adida
• Re: RDFa and Web Directions North 2009 Kingsley Idehen
• Re: Contd: RDFa and Web Directions North 2009 Kingsley Idehen
• Re: RDFa and Web Directions North 2009 Karl Dubost
• Re: RDFa and Web Directions North 2009 Kingsley Idehen
• Re: RDFa and Web Directions North 2009 Kjetil Kjernsmo
• Re: RDFa and Web Directions North 2009 Kjetil Kjernsmo
• Re: RDFa and Web Directions North 2009 Ian Hickson
• Re: RDFa and Web Directions North 2009 Karl Dubost
• Re: RDFa and Web Directions North 2009 Kjetil Kjernsmo
• Re: Contd: RDFa and Web Directions North 2009 Ian Hickson
• Re: RDFa and Web Directions North 2009 Ian Hickson
• Re: RDFa and Web Directions North 2009 Karl Dubost
• Contd: RDFa and Web Directions North 2009 Kingsley Idehen
• Re: RDFa and Web Directions North 2009 Kingsley Idehen
• Re: RDFa and Web Directions North 2009 Ian Hickson
• Re: RDFa and Web Directions North 2009 Ian Hickson
• Re: RDFa and Web Directions North 2009 Michael Hausenblas
• Re: RDFa and Web Directions North 2009 Kjetil Kjernsmo
• Re: RDFa and Web Directions North 2009 Sam Ruby
• RE: RDFa and Web Directions North 2009 Jeremy Carroll
• Re: RDFa and Web Directions North 2009 Manu Sporny
• Re: RDFa and Web Directions North 2009 Mark Birbeck
• Re: RDFa and Web Directions North 2009 Ian Hickson
• Re: RDFa and Web Directions North 2009 Sam Ruby
• Re: RDFa and Web Directions North 2009 Mark Birbeck
• Re: RDFa and Web Directions North 2009 Sam Ruby
• Re: RDFa and Web Directions North 2009 Michael Bolger
• Re: RDFa and Web Directions North 2009 Sam Ruby
• Re: RDFa and Web Directions North 2009 Kingsley Idehen
• Re: RDFa and Web Directions North 2009 (html5/xhtml5 process) Michael Bolger
• Re: RDFa and Web Directions North 2009 Sam Ruby
• Re: RDFa and Web Directions North 2009 Manu Sporny
• Re: RDFa and Web Directions North 2009 (html5/xhtml5 process) Dan Connolly
• Re: RDFa and Web Directions North 2009 Dan Brickley
• Re: RDFa and Web Directions North 2009 Michael Bolger
• Re: RDFa and Web Directions North 2009 Karl Dubost
• Re: RDFa and Web Directions North 2009 Dan Brickley
• Re: RDFa and Web Directions North 2009 Michael Bolger

Thursday, 12 February 2009

• Re: W3C TAG Finding "The Self-Describing Web" has been published Dan Brickley

Wednesday, 11 February 2009

• Re: RDFa and the owl:Thing class Ivan Herman
• RDFa and the owl:Thing class Sandy Pérez

Tuesday, 10 February 2009

• non-meeting record: 2009-02-05 RDFa Ralph R. Swick
• ISSUE-190: Last Call Comment: Unicity of prefLabel (comment in SKOS RDF) SWD Issue Tracker
• ISSUE-189: Unicity of prefLabel rule (SKOS Primer) SWD Issue Tracker

Monday, 9 February 2009

• Re: RDFa and Web Directions North 2009 Kingsley Idehen
• Re: RDFa and Web Directions North 2009 Michael(tm) Smith
• Re: RDFa and Web Directions North 2009 Mark Birbeck
• Re: RDFa and Web Directions North 2009 Ben Adida
• RDFa and Web Directions North 2009 Manu Sporny

Sunday, 8 February 2009

• Re: Named Graphs in RDFa Kjetil Kjernsmo

Wednesday, 4 February 2009

• regrets Ben Adida
• AW: [ANN] Standard Thesaurus Economics in RDFa/SKOS (tech preview) Neubert Joachim
• Regrets Steven Pemberton
• Re: [ANN] Standard Thesaurus Economics in RDFa/SKOS (tech preview) Ivan Herman

Tuesday, 3 February 2009

• Re: getting the value in rdf:datatype Toby Inkster

Monday, 2 February 2009

• getting the value in rdf:datatype The Boy

Sunday, 1 February 2009

• Re: Named Graphs in RDFa Mark Birbeck
• Re: Discussion with Ian and Henri about HTML5+RDFa (part 2/2) Niklas Lindström
• Re: Named Graphs in RDFa Kjetil Kjernsmo
• Re: Named Graphs in RDFa Shane McCarron
• Re: Named Graphs in RDFa Kjetil Kjernsmo
• Re: Named Graphs in RDFa Kjetil Kjernsmo
• Re: Named Graphs in RDFa Toby A Inkster
• Re: Named Graphs in RDFa Toby A Inkster
• Re: Named Graphs in RDFa Dan Brickley
• Re: Named Graphs in RDFa Michael Hausenblas
• Named Graphs in RDFa Toby A Inkster

Last message date: Saturday, 28 February 2009 23:33:58 UTC