- From: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>
- Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2009 17:11:33 -0500
- To: Rob Sayre <rsayre@mozilla.com>
- CC: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com, Henri Sivonen <hsivonen@iki.fi>, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>, HTMLWG WG <public-html@w3.org>, RDFa mailing list <public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org>, public-xhtml2@w3.org, "www-tag@w3.org WG" <www-tag@w3.org>
Rob Sayre wrote: > On 2/27/09 6:07 PM, Mark Nottingham wrote: >> Hi Noah, >> >> It seems to me that indeed the TAG should be actively involved, since >> the primary issue here is about architectural coordination. > > Many have suggested that the HTML WG work on a less ambitious initial > deliverable, and establish a pattern of quick iteration. This thread > shows that it might not make sense to gate HTML interoperability efforts > on XHTML coordination. I am not suggesting giving up on coordination, > but I do think some issues will need the amount of time Ian has > estimated for his document. > > You can Solve Any Problem... if you're willing to make the problem small > enough, What concerns me more than coordination costs is that RDFa in text/html is proceeding: http://rdfa.info/wiki/RDFainHTML4 http://esw.w3.org/topic/RDFa#head-681001ee6c73e87bd692e29693b3904e462fd9f2 http://www.w3.org/Submission/2008/SUBM-ccREL-20080501/ http://www.whitehouse.gov/ - Sam Ruby
Received on Saturday, 28 February 2009 22:11:58 UTC