public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org from February 2009 by author

Ben Adida

• Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (Saturday, 28 February)
• Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (Saturday, 28 February)
• Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (Saturday, 28 February)
• Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (Saturday, 28 February)
• Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (Saturday, 28 February)
• Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (Saturday, 28 February)
• Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (Friday, 27 February)
• Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (Friday, 27 February)
• Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (Friday, 27 February)
• Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (Friday, 27 February)
• Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (Friday, 27 February)
• Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (Friday, 27 February)
• Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (Friday, 27 February)
• Re: RDFa Questions Answered (part 1/N) (Tuesday, 24 February)
• Re: FYI: dear adobe here's an idea for you (Tuesday, 24 February)
• Re: RDFa Questions Answered (part 1/N) (Monday, 23 February)
• Re: CURIE objections in HTML5+RDFa (Friday, 20 February)
• telecon Thursday - 19 February (Thursday, 19 February)
• Re: RDFa Use Cases (Thursday, 19 February)
• Re: RDFa and Web Directions North 2009 (Tuesday, 17 February)
• Re: RDFa and Web Directions North 2009 (Tuesday, 17 February)
• Re: RDFa and Web Directions North 2009 (Tuesday, 17 February)
• Re: RDFa and Web Directions North 2009 (Tuesday, 17 February)
• Re: RDFa and Web Directions North 2009 (Sunday, 15 February)
• Google adds another link type (Sunday, 15 February)
• Re: RDFa Wiki (Saturday, 14 February)
• Re: RDFa and Web Directions North 2009 (Saturday, 14 February)
• Re: RDFa and Web Directions North 2009 (Saturday, 14 February)
• Re: RDFa and Web Directions North 2009 (Friday, 13 February)
• Re: RDFa and Web Directions North 2009 (Monday, 9 February)
• regrets (Wednesday, 4 February)

Dan Brickley

• Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (Friday, 27 February)
• [Fwd: Using XMLNS in link/@rel] (Friday, 27 February)
• Re: FYI: dear adobe here's an idea for you (Tuesday, 24 February)
• Re: RDFa Security and Persistence (Thursday, 19 February)
• Re: RDFa Use Cases (Wednesday, 18 February)
• Re: RDFa and Web Directions North 2009 (Wednesday, 18 February)
• Re: RDFa and Web Directions North 2009 (Wednesday, 18 February)
• Re: RDFa and Web Directions North 2009 (Wednesday, 18 February)
• Re: HTML5 & SQL Engine Persistence (Tuesday, 17 February)
• Re: RDFa and Web Directions North 2009 (Tuesday, 17 February)
• Re: RDFa and Web Directions North 2009 (Friday, 13 February)
• Re: RDFa and Web Directions North 2009 (Friday, 13 February)
• Re: W3C TAG Finding "The Self-Describing Web" has been published (Thursday, 12 February)
• Re: Named Graphs in RDFa (Sunday, 1 February)

Dan Connolly

• Re: RDFa and Web Directions North 2009 (html5/xhtml5 process) (Friday, 13 February)

Danny Ayers

• Re: RDFa Use Cases (Wednesday, 18 February)
• Re: RDFa Use Cases (Wednesday, 18 February)

Elias Torres

• Re: CURIE objections in HTML5+RDFa (was: Re: RDFa and Web Directions North 2009) (Wednesday, 18 February)

Henri Sivonen

• Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (Friday, 27 February)
• Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (Friday, 27 February)
• Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (Friday, 27 February)
• Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (Friday, 27 February)
• Re: CURIE objections in HTML5+RDFa (Thursday, 26 February)
• Re: CURIE objections in HTML5+RDFa (Wednesday, 25 February)
• Re: CURIE objections in HTML5+RDFa (Wednesday, 25 February)
• Re: CURIE objections in HTML5+RDFa (Thursday, 19 February)
• Re: RDFa and Web Directions North 2009 (Thursday, 19 February)
• Re: RDFa and Web Directions North 2009 (Thursday, 19 February)
• Re: RDFa and Web Directions North 2009 (Wednesday, 18 February)
• Re: RDFa and Web Directions North 2009 (Wednesday, 18 February)
• Re: RDFa and Web Directions North 2009 (Wednesday, 18 February)
• Re: RDFa and Web Directions North 2009 (Wednesday, 18 February)
• Re: RDFa and Web Directions North 2009 (Wednesday, 18 February)
• Re: RDFa and Web Directions North 2009 (Wednesday, 18 February)
• Re: RDFa and Web Directions North 2009 (Wednesday, 18 February)
• Re: RDFa and Web Directions North 2009 (Wednesday, 18 February)
• Re: CURIE objections in HTML5+RDFa (was: Re: RDFa and Web Directions North 2009) (Wednesday, 18 February)
• Re: RDFa and Web Directions North 2009 (Wednesday, 18 February)
• Re: RDFa and Web Directions North 2009 (Wednesday, 18 February)
• Re: RDFa and Web Directions North 2009 (Tuesday, 17 February)
• Re: RDFa and Web Directions North 2009 (Monday, 16 February)
• Re: RDFa and Web Directions North 2009 (Monday, 16 February)
• Re: RDFa and Web Directions North 2009 (Monday, 16 February)
• Re: RDFa and Web Directions North 2009 (Monday, 16 February)
• Re: RDFa and Web Directions North 2009 (Monday, 16 February)
• Re: RDFa and Web Directions North 2009 (Monday, 16 February)
• Re: RDFa and Web Directions North 2009 (Monday, 16 February)
• Re: RDFa and Web Directions North 2009 (Monday, 16 February)

Ian Hickson

• Re: RDFa Use Cases (Thursday, 19 February)
• Re: RDFa Use Cases (Tuesday, 17 February)
• Re: RDFa and Web Directions North 2009 (Tuesday, 17 February)
• Re: RDFa and Web Directions North 2009 (Tuesday, 17 February)
• Re: RDFa Use Cases (was: RDFa and Web Directions North 2009) (Tuesday, 17 February)
• Re: RDFa and Web Directions North 2009 (Sunday, 15 February)
• Re: RDFa and Web Directions North 2009 (Saturday, 14 February)
• Re: RDFa and Web Directions North 2009 (Friday, 13 February)
• Re: RDFa and Web Directions North 2009 (Friday, 13 February)
• Re: Contd: RDFa and Web Directions North 2009 (Friday, 13 February)
• Re: RDFa and Web Directions North 2009 (Friday, 13 February)
• Re: RDFa and Web Directions North 2009 (Friday, 13 February)
• Re: RDFa and Web Directions North 2009 (Friday, 13 February)
• Re: RDFa and Web Directions North 2009 (Friday, 13 February)

Ivan Herman

• Re: RDFa and Web Directions North 2009 (Monday, 16 February)
• Re: RDFa and Web Directions North 2009 (Monday, 16 February)
• Re: RDFa and Web Directions North 2009 (Monday, 16 February)
• Re: RDFa and Web Directions North 2009 (Monday, 16 February)
• Re: RDFa and Web Directions North 2009 (Monday, 16 February)
• Re: RDFa and the owl:Thing class (Wednesday, 11 February)
• Re: [ANN] Standard Thesaurus Economics in RDFa/SKOS (tech preview) (Wednesday, 4 February)

Jeremy Carroll

• RE: FYI: dear adobe here's an idea for you (Wednesday, 25 February)
• RE: RDFa and Web Directions North 2009 (Sunday, 15 February)
• RE: RDFa and Web Directions North 2009 (Saturday, 14 February)
• RE: RDFa and Web Directions North 2009 (Saturday, 14 February)
• RE: RDFa and Web Directions North 2009 (Friday, 13 February)

Julian Reschke

• Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (Saturday, 28 February)
• Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (Saturday, 28 February)
• Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (Saturday, 28 February)
• Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (Saturday, 28 February)
• Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (Saturday, 28 February)
• Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (Friday, 27 February)
• Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (Friday, 27 February)
• Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (Friday, 27 February)
• Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (Friday, 27 February)
• Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (Friday, 27 February)
• Re: [Fwd: Using XMLNS in link/@rel] (Friday, 27 February)
• Re: [Fwd: Using XMLNS in link/@rel] (Friday, 27 February)
• Re: RDFa and Web Directions North 2009 (Wednesday, 18 February)
• Re: RDFa and Web Directions North 2009 (Wednesday, 18 February)
• Re: RDFa and Web Directions North 2009 (Wednesday, 18 February)
• Re: RDFa and Web Directions North 2009 (Wednesday, 18 February)
• Re: RDFa and Web Directions North 2009 (Tuesday, 17 February)
• Re: RDFa and Web Directions North 2009 (Monday, 16 February)
• Re: Google adds another link type (Sunday, 15 February)
• Re: RDFa and Web Directions North 2009 (Saturday, 14 February)

KANZAKI Masahide

• Re: RDFa DTD and HTML character entity (Thursday, 26 February)
• RDFa DTD and HTML character entity (Thursday, 26 February)

Karl Dubost

• Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (Saturday, 28 February)
• Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (Friday, 27 February)
• Re: RDFa and Web Directions North 2009 (Thursday, 19 February)
• Re: RDFa and Web Directions North 2009 (Wednesday, 18 February)
• Re: Updates to RDFa Use Cases (was: RDFa and Web Directions North 2009) (Saturday, 14 February)
• Re: RDFa and Web Directions North 2009 (Friday, 13 February)
• Re: RDFa and Web Directions North 2009 (Friday, 13 February)
• Re: RDFa and Web Directions North 2009 (Friday, 13 February)
• Re: RDFa and Web Directions North 2009 (Friday, 13 February)

Kingsley Idehen

• Re: HTML5 & SQL Engine Persistence (Tuesday, 17 February)
• HTML5 & SQL Engine Persistence (Tuesday, 17 February)
• Re: RDFa and Web Directions North 2009 (Monday, 16 February)
• Re: RDFa and Web Directions North 2009 (Sunday, 15 February)
• Re: RDFa Wiki (Saturday, 14 February)
• RDFa Wiki (Saturday, 14 February)
• Re: RDFa and Web Directions North 2009 (Saturday, 14 February)
• Re: RDFa and Web Directions North 2009 (Friday, 13 February)
• Re: Contd: RDFa and Web Directions North 2009 (Friday, 13 February)
• Re: RDFa and Web Directions North 2009 (Friday, 13 February)
• Contd: RDFa and Web Directions North 2009 (Friday, 13 February)
• Re: RDFa and Web Directions North 2009 (Friday, 13 February)
• Re: RDFa and Web Directions North 2009 (Friday, 13 February)
• Re: RDFa and Web Directions North 2009 (Monday, 9 February)

Kjetil Kjernsmo

• Re: Named Graphs in RDFa (Tuesday, 17 February)
• Re: RDFa and Web Directions North 2009 (Saturday, 14 February)
• Re: RDFa and Web Directions North 2009 (Friday, 13 February)
• Re: RDFa and Web Directions North 2009 (Friday, 13 February)
• Re: RDFa and Web Directions North 2009 (Friday, 13 February)
• Re: RDFa and Web Directions North 2009 (Friday, 13 February)
• Re: Named Graphs in RDFa (Sunday, 8 February)
• Re: Named Graphs in RDFa (Sunday, 1 February)
• Re: Named Graphs in RDFa (Sunday, 1 February)
• Re: Named Graphs in RDFa (Sunday, 1 February)

Larry Masinter

• RE: FYI: dear adobe here's an idea for you (Tuesday, 24 February)

Maciej Stachowiak

• Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (Saturday, 28 February)

Manu Sporny

• Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (Saturday, 28 February)
• Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (Friday, 27 February)
• Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (Friday, 27 February)
• Re: CURIE objections in HTML5+RDFa (Wednesday, 25 February)
• Re: CURIE objections in HTML5+RDFa (Wednesday, 25 February)
• Re: RDFa Questions Answered (part 1/N) (Tuesday, 24 February)
• Updates to RDFa wiki (Tuesday, 24 February)
• RDFa Questions Answered (part 1/N) (was: Re: RDFa and Web Directions North 2009) (Monday, 23 February)
• RDFa Task Force Charter Scope (Saturday, 21 February)
• Re: CURIE objections in HTML5+RDFa (Friday, 20 February)
• Re: telecon Thursday - 19 February (Thursday, 19 February)
• Re: telecon Thursday - 19 February (Thursday, 19 February)
• Re: RDFa Security and Persistence (Thursday, 19 February)
• RDFa Security and Persistence (was: Re: RDFa Use Cases) (Thursday, 19 February)
• Re: RDFa Use Cases (Wednesday, 18 February)
• New Threads Request (was: Re: RDFa and Web Directions North 2009) (Wednesday, 18 February)
• Re: CURIE objections in HTML5+RDFa (Wednesday, 18 February)
• Re: RDFa Use Cases (Tuesday, 17 February)
• CURIE objections in HTML5+RDFa (was: Re: RDFa and Web Directions North 2009) (Tuesday, 17 February)
• RDFa Use Cases (was: RDFa and Web Directions North 2009) (Sunday, 15 February)
• Re: RDFa and Web Directions North 2009 (Saturday, 14 February)
• Re: Updates to RDFa Use Cases (Saturday, 14 February)
• Re: Updates to RDFa Use Cases (Saturday, 14 February)
• Updates to RDFa Use Cases (was: RDFa and Web Directions North 2009) (Saturday, 14 February)
• Re: RDFa and Web Directions North 2009 (Friday, 13 February)
• Re: RDFa and Web Directions North 2009 (Friday, 13 February)
• RDFa and Web Directions North 2009 (Monday, 9 February)

Mark Birbeck

• Re: RDFa DTD and HTML character entity (Thursday, 26 February)
• Re: telecon Thursday - 19 February (Thursday, 19 February)
• Re: RDFa and Web Directions North 2009 (Wednesday, 18 February)
• Re: RDFa and Web Directions North 2009 (Wednesday, 18 February)
• Re: RDFa and Web Directions North 2009 (Wednesday, 18 February)
• Re: RDFa and Web Directions North 2009 (Wednesday, 18 February)
• Re: Named Graphs in RDFa (Tuesday, 17 February)
• Re: Named Graphs in RDFa (Tuesday, 17 February)
• Re: RDFa and Web Directions North 2009 (Monday, 16 February)
• Re: RDFa and Web Directions North 2009 (Monday, 16 February)
• Re: RDFa and Web Directions North 2009 (Monday, 16 February)
• Re: RDFa and Web Directions North 2009 (Friday, 13 February)
• Re: RDFa and Web Directions North 2009 (Friday, 13 February)
• Re: RDFa and Web Directions North 2009 (Friday, 13 February)
• Re: RDFa and Web Directions North 2009 (Monday, 9 February)
• Re: Named Graphs in RDFa (Sunday, 1 February)

Mark Nottingham

• Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (Friday, 27 February)
• Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (Friday, 27 February)
• Re: [Fwd: Using XMLNS in link/@rel] (Friday, 27 February)
• Re: [Fwd: Using XMLNS in link/@rel] (Friday, 27 February)

Martin McEvoy

• RE: FYI: dear adobe here's an idea for you (Thursday, 26 February)
• FYI: dear adobe here's an idea for you (Tuesday, 24 February)
• Re: RDFa Use Cases (Wednesday, 18 February)

Michael Bolger

• Re: RDFa and Web Directions North 2009 (Friday, 13 February)
• Re: RDFa and Web Directions North 2009 (html5/xhtml5 process) (Friday, 13 February)
• Re: RDFa and Web Directions North 2009 (Friday, 13 February)
• Re: RDFa and Web Directions North 2009 (Friday, 13 February)

Michael Hausenblas

• Re: [Fwd: FYI: Link -04] (Thursday, 26 February)
• Re: telecon Thursday - 19 February (Thursday, 19 February)
• Re: RDFa and Web Directions North 2009 (Friday, 13 February)
• Re: Named Graphs in RDFa (Sunday, 1 February)

Michael(tm) Smith

• Re: RDFa and Web Directions North 2009 (Monday, 9 February)

Nathan Yergler

• Re: RDFa Wiki (Saturday, 14 February)

Neubert Joachim

• AW: [ANN] Standard Thesaurus Economics in RDFa/SKOS (tech preview) (Wednesday, 4 February)

Niklas Lindström

• Re: Discussion with Ian and Henri about HTML5+RDFa (part 2/2) (Sunday, 1 February)

noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com

• Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (Saturday, 28 February)
• Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (Friday, 27 February)

Phil Archer

• Re: [Fwd: Using XMLNS in link/@rel] (Friday, 27 February)

Ralph R. Swick

• meeting record: 2009-02-19 RDFa Task Force (Thursday, 19 February)
• non-meeting record: 2009-02-05 RDFa (Tuesday, 10 February)

Rob Sayre

• Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (Saturday, 28 February)
• Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (Saturday, 28 February)
• Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (Saturday, 28 February)

Robert J Burns

• Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (Friday, 27 February)

Sam Ruby

• Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (Saturday, 28 February)
• Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (Saturday, 28 February)
• Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (Saturday, 28 February)
• Re: New Threads Request (Wednesday, 18 February)
• Re: RDFa and Web Directions North 2009 (Wednesday, 18 February)
• Re: RDFa and Web Directions North 2009 (Wednesday, 18 February)
• Re: RDFa and Web Directions North 2009 (Monday, 16 February)
• Re: RDFa Wiki (Saturday, 14 February)
• Re: Updates to RDFa Use Cases (Saturday, 14 February)
• Re: RDFa and Web Directions North 2009 (Saturday, 14 February)
• Re: RDFa and Web Directions North 2009 (Friday, 13 February)
• Re: RDFa and Web Directions North 2009 (Friday, 13 February)
• Re: RDFa and Web Directions North 2009 (Friday, 13 February)
• Re: RDFa and Web Directions North 2009 (Friday, 13 February)
• Re: RDFa and Web Directions North 2009 (Friday, 13 February)

Sandy Pérez

• RDFa and the owl:Thing class (Wednesday, 11 February)

Shane McCarron

• Re: @rel syntax in RDFa (relevant to ISSUE-60 discussion), was: Using XMLNS in link/@rel (Friday, 27 February)
• Re: [Fwd: Using XMLNS in link/@rel] (Friday, 27 February)
• Re: RDFa DTD and HTML character entity (Thursday, 26 February)
• Re: RDFa DTD and HTML character entity (Thursday, 26 February)
• [Fwd: FYI: Link -04] (Wednesday, 25 February)
• Re: Named Graphs in RDFa (Sunday, 1 February)

Simon Reinhardt

• Re: Google adds another link type (Sunday, 15 February)

Steven Pemberton

• Re: [Fwd: Using XMLNS in link/@rel] (Friday, 27 February)
• Re: [Fwd: Using XMLNS in link/@rel] (Friday, 27 February)
• Regrets (Wednesday, 4 February)

SWD Issue Tracker

• ISSUE-190: Last Call Comment: Unicity of prefLabel (comment in SKOS RDF) (Tuesday, 10 February)
• ISSUE-189: Unicity of prefLabel rule (SKOS Primer) (Tuesday, 10 February)

The Boy

• getting the value in rdf:datatype (Monday, 2 February)

Toby A Inkster

• Re: CURIE objections in HTML5+RDFa (Thursday, 26 February)
• Re: RDFa DTD and HTML character entity (Thursday, 26 February)
• W3C Validator 0.8.5 (Tuesday, 17 February)
• User Agent conformance requirements for RDFa [was Re: RDFa and Web Directions North 2009] (Tuesday, 17 February)
• Re: Named Graphs in RDFa (Monday, 16 February)
• Re: RDFa and Web Directions North 2009 (Sunday, 15 February)
• Re: Named Graphs in RDFa (Sunday, 1 February)
• Re: Named Graphs in RDFa (Sunday, 1 February)
• Named Graphs in RDFa (Sunday, 1 February)

Toby Inkster

• Re: getting the value in rdf:datatype (Tuesday, 3 February)

Last message date: Saturday, 28 February 2009 23:33:58 UTC