- From: Shane McCarron <shane@aptest.com>
- Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2009 08:44:21 -0600
- To: Henri Sivonen <hsivonen@iki.fi>
- CC: Karl Dubost <karl@la-grange.net>, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, HTMLWG WG <public-html@w3.org>, "www-tag@w3.org WG" <www-tag@w3.org>, RDFa mailing list <public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org>, public-xhtml2@w3.org
Henri Sivonen wrote: > Indeed. However, the remedy of errataing RDFa to use full URIs instead > of CURIEs would address both that issue and the rel *value* issue Mark > Nottingham raised. (Well, at least if the full URIs used as rel tokens > do not have upper case letters A-Z.) Sure. However, CURIEs are NOT a mistake in a recommendation that could ever be "errated" out. Any change of that magnitude would require a new version of the specification with corresponding review cycles, balloting, etc. And I, at least, would object to such a change. -- Shane P. McCarron Phone: +1 763 786-8160 x120 Managing Director Fax: +1 763 786-8180 ApTest Minnesota Inet: shane@aptest.com
Received on Friday, 27 February 2009 14:45:18 UTC